Cargando…

Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation

PURPOSE: Clinical target volumes (CTV) for radiotherapy (RT) in esophageal cancer (EC) are based on standard expansions of primary tumor volume. Data is needed to define regions at highest risk for occult disease, based on histology and location of the primary tumor. We therefore reviewed PET scans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia, Brandon, Goodman, Karyn A., Cambridge, Lajhem, Dunphy, Mark, Wu, Abraham J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27887643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0731-6
_version_ 1782469692089171968
author Garcia, Brandon
Goodman, Karyn A.
Cambridge, Lajhem
Dunphy, Mark
Wu, Abraham J.
author_facet Garcia, Brandon
Goodman, Karyn A.
Cambridge, Lajhem
Dunphy, Mark
Wu, Abraham J.
author_sort Garcia, Brandon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Clinical target volumes (CTV) for radiotherapy (RT) in esophageal cancer (EC) are based on standard expansions of primary tumor volume. Data is needed to define regions at highest risk for occult disease, based on histology and location of the primary tumor. We therefore reviewed PET scans in EC patients to characterize the location of FDG-avid lymph node metastases (LNM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 473 EC patients with reviewable pre-treatment PET-CT scans. Tumors were classified by histology and location; 85% were distal or GE junction tumors and 71% were adenocarcinoma. FDG-avid LNM were classified using standard radiographic nodal atlases, and distances from primary tumor to paraesophageal LNM were also measured. RESULTS: The most common LNM in upper EC were supraclavicular, retrotracheal and paratracheal. The most common LNM in lower EC were paraesophageal and in the gastrohepatic space. Overall, 55% of paraesophageal LNM were adjacent to primary tumor. Of upper esophageal tumors with paraesophageal LNM, 87% were adjacent to the tumor and none were >6 cm from tumor. However, 57% of lower esophageal tumors with paraesophageal LNM had non-adjacent paraesophageal nodes, 24% of which were >8 cm from the tumor. CONCLUSION: A more data-driven and individualized approach to CTV delineation could improve the therapeutic ratio of RT in esophageal cancer. These results can guide CTV delineation by indicating the potential distribution of nodal involvement in esophageal cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0731-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5123237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51232372016-12-06 Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation Garcia, Brandon Goodman, Karyn A. Cambridge, Lajhem Dunphy, Mark Wu, Abraham J. Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: Clinical target volumes (CTV) for radiotherapy (RT) in esophageal cancer (EC) are based on standard expansions of primary tumor volume. Data is needed to define regions at highest risk for occult disease, based on histology and location of the primary tumor. We therefore reviewed PET scans in EC patients to characterize the location of FDG-avid lymph node metastases (LNM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 473 EC patients with reviewable pre-treatment PET-CT scans. Tumors were classified by histology and location; 85% were distal or GE junction tumors and 71% were adenocarcinoma. FDG-avid LNM were classified using standard radiographic nodal atlases, and distances from primary tumor to paraesophageal LNM were also measured. RESULTS: The most common LNM in upper EC were supraclavicular, retrotracheal and paratracheal. The most common LNM in lower EC were paraesophageal and in the gastrohepatic space. Overall, 55% of paraesophageal LNM were adjacent to primary tumor. Of upper esophageal tumors with paraesophageal LNM, 87% were adjacent to the tumor and none were >6 cm from tumor. However, 57% of lower esophageal tumors with paraesophageal LNM had non-adjacent paraesophageal nodes, 24% of which were >8 cm from the tumor. CONCLUSION: A more data-driven and individualized approach to CTV delineation could improve the therapeutic ratio of RT in esophageal cancer. These results can guide CTV delineation by indicating the potential distribution of nodal involvement in esophageal cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0731-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5123237/ /pubmed/27887643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0731-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Garcia, Brandon
Goodman, Karyn A.
Cambridge, Lajhem
Dunphy, Mark
Wu, Abraham J.
Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation
title Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation
title_full Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation
title_fullStr Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation
title_short Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation
title_sort distribution of fdg-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for radiotherapy target delineation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27887643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0731-6
work_keys_str_mv AT garciabrandon distributionoffdgavidnodesinesophagealcancerimplicationsforradiotherapytargetdelineation
AT goodmankaryna distributionoffdgavidnodesinesophagealcancerimplicationsforradiotherapytargetdelineation
AT cambridgelajhem distributionoffdgavidnodesinesophagealcancerimplicationsforradiotherapytargetdelineation
AT dunphymark distributionoffdgavidnodesinesophagealcancerimplicationsforradiotherapytargetdelineation
AT wuabrahamj distributionoffdgavidnodesinesophagealcancerimplicationsforradiotherapytargetdelineation