Cargando…

Empirical analysis of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) using structural equation modeling

OBJECTIVE: To empirically test the relationships proposed by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) among its domains. METHOD: The cross-sectional study was completed with 226 adult patients with different health conditions who attended a Brazilian rehabilitatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dutra, Fabiana C. M. S., Mancini, Marisa C., Neves, Jorge A., Kirkwood, Renata N., Sampaio, Rosana F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0168
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To empirically test the relationships proposed by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) among its domains. METHOD: The cross-sectional study was completed with 226 adult patients with different health conditions who attended a Brazilian rehabilitation unit. The ICF components were measured with the following instruments: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Instrument II, Functional Independence Measure, Participation Scale, Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors, and a protocol designed to gather information on body structure and function and personal factors. RESULTS: Structural equation modeling showed good model adjustment, GFI=0.863; AGFI=0.795; RMSEA=0.028 (90% CI=0.014-0.043). Significant relationships were found between activity and both body structure and function (standard coefficient=0.32; p<0.0001) and participation components (standard coefficient=–0.70; p<0.0001). Environmental and personal factors had a significant effect on the three functioning components (standard coefficient =0.39; p<0.0001; standard coefficient =-0.35; p<0.001, respectively). In contrast, body structure and function had no significant effect on participation (standard coefficient=–0.10; p=0.111) and health conditions had no significant effect on any of the functioning components, i.e., body structure and function, activity, and participation (standard coefficient=–0.12; p=0.128). CONCLUSION: Some of the ICF’s proposed relationships across domains were confirmed, while others were not found to be significant. Our results reinforce the contextual dependency of the functioning and disability processes, in addition to putting into perspective the impact of health conditions.