Cargando…
Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies
BACKGROUND: Sequencing-based analysis has become a well-established approach to deciphering the composition of the gut microbiota. However, due to the complexity of accessing sufficient material from colonoscopic biopsy samples, most studies have focused on faecal microbiota analysis, even though it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27884202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9 |
_version_ | 1782469717799206912 |
---|---|
author | Watt, Euan Gemmell, Matthew R. Berry, Susan Glaire, Mark Farquharson, Freda Louis, Petra Murray, Graeme I. El-Omar, Emad Hold, Georgina L. |
author_facet | Watt, Euan Gemmell, Matthew R. Berry, Susan Glaire, Mark Farquharson, Freda Louis, Petra Murray, Graeme I. El-Omar, Emad Hold, Georgina L. |
author_sort | Watt, Euan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sequencing-based analysis has become a well-established approach to deciphering the composition of the gut microbiota. However, due to the complexity of accessing sufficient material from colonoscopic biopsy samples, most studies have focused on faecal microbiota analysis, even though it is recognised that differences exist between the microbial composition of colonic biopsies and faecal samples. We determined the suitability of colonic lavage samples to see if it had comparable microbial diversity composition to colonic biopsies as they are without the limitations associated with sample size. We collected paired colonic biopsies and lavage samples from subjects who were attending for colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing and qPCR validation were performed with multiple bioinformatics analyses to determine the composition and predict function of the microbiota. Colonic lavage samples contained significantly higher numbers of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) compared to corresponding biopsy samples, however, diversity and evenness between lavage and biopsy samples were similar. The differences seen were driven by the presence of 12 OTUs which were in higher relative abundance in biopsies and were either not present or in low relative abundance in lavage samples, whilst a further 3 OTUs were present in higher amounts in the lavage samples compared to biopsy samples. However, predicted functional community profiling based on 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) data indicated minimal differences between sample types. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that colonic lavage samples provide a relatively accurate representation of biopsy microbiota composition and should be considered where biopsy size is an issue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5123352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51233522016-12-06 Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies Watt, Euan Gemmell, Matthew R. Berry, Susan Glaire, Mark Farquharson, Freda Louis, Petra Murray, Graeme I. El-Omar, Emad Hold, Georgina L. Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Sequencing-based analysis has become a well-established approach to deciphering the composition of the gut microbiota. However, due to the complexity of accessing sufficient material from colonoscopic biopsy samples, most studies have focused on faecal microbiota analysis, even though it is recognised that differences exist between the microbial composition of colonic biopsies and faecal samples. We determined the suitability of colonic lavage samples to see if it had comparable microbial diversity composition to colonic biopsies as they are without the limitations associated with sample size. We collected paired colonic biopsies and lavage samples from subjects who were attending for colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing and qPCR validation were performed with multiple bioinformatics analyses to determine the composition and predict function of the microbiota. Colonic lavage samples contained significantly higher numbers of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) compared to corresponding biopsy samples, however, diversity and evenness between lavage and biopsy samples were similar. The differences seen were driven by the presence of 12 OTUs which were in higher relative abundance in biopsies and were either not present or in low relative abundance in lavage samples, whilst a further 3 OTUs were present in higher amounts in the lavage samples compared to biopsy samples. However, predicted functional community profiling based on 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) data indicated minimal differences between sample types. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that colonic lavage samples provide a relatively accurate representation of biopsy microbiota composition and should be considered where biopsy size is an issue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5123352/ /pubmed/27884202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Watt, Euan Gemmell, Matthew R. Berry, Susan Glaire, Mark Farquharson, Freda Louis, Petra Murray, Graeme I. El-Omar, Emad Hold, Georgina L. Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies |
title | Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies |
title_full | Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies |
title_fullStr | Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies |
title_full_unstemmed | Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies |
title_short | Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies |
title_sort | extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27884202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watteuan extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies AT gemmellmatthewr extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies AT berrysusan extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies AT glairemark extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies AT farquharsonfreda extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies AT louispetra extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies AT murraygraemei extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies AT elomaremad extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies AT holdgeorginal extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies |