Cargando…

Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies

BACKGROUND: Sequencing-based analysis has become a well-established approach to deciphering the composition of the gut microbiota. However, due to the complexity of accessing sufficient material from colonoscopic biopsy samples, most studies have focused on faecal microbiota analysis, even though it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watt, Euan, Gemmell, Matthew R., Berry, Susan, Glaire, Mark, Farquharson, Freda, Louis, Petra, Murray, Graeme I., El-Omar, Emad, Hold, Georgina L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27884202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9
_version_ 1782469717799206912
author Watt, Euan
Gemmell, Matthew R.
Berry, Susan
Glaire, Mark
Farquharson, Freda
Louis, Petra
Murray, Graeme I.
El-Omar, Emad
Hold, Georgina L.
author_facet Watt, Euan
Gemmell, Matthew R.
Berry, Susan
Glaire, Mark
Farquharson, Freda
Louis, Petra
Murray, Graeme I.
El-Omar, Emad
Hold, Georgina L.
author_sort Watt, Euan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sequencing-based analysis has become a well-established approach to deciphering the composition of the gut microbiota. However, due to the complexity of accessing sufficient material from colonoscopic biopsy samples, most studies have focused on faecal microbiota analysis, even though it is recognised that differences exist between the microbial composition of colonic biopsies and faecal samples. We determined the suitability of colonic lavage samples to see if it had comparable microbial diversity composition to colonic biopsies as they are without the limitations associated with sample size. We collected paired colonic biopsies and lavage samples from subjects who were attending for colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing and qPCR validation were performed with multiple bioinformatics analyses to determine the composition and predict function of the microbiota. Colonic lavage samples contained significantly higher numbers of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) compared to corresponding biopsy samples, however, diversity and evenness between lavage and biopsy samples were similar. The differences seen were driven by the presence of 12 OTUs which were in higher relative abundance in biopsies and were either not present or in low relative abundance in lavage samples, whilst a further 3 OTUs were present in higher amounts in the lavage samples compared to biopsy samples. However, predicted functional community profiling based on 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) data indicated minimal differences between sample types. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that colonic lavage samples provide a relatively accurate representation of biopsy microbiota composition and should be considered where biopsy size is an issue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5123352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51233522016-12-06 Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies Watt, Euan Gemmell, Matthew R. Berry, Susan Glaire, Mark Farquharson, Freda Louis, Petra Murray, Graeme I. El-Omar, Emad Hold, Georgina L. Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Sequencing-based analysis has become a well-established approach to deciphering the composition of the gut microbiota. However, due to the complexity of accessing sufficient material from colonoscopic biopsy samples, most studies have focused on faecal microbiota analysis, even though it is recognised that differences exist between the microbial composition of colonic biopsies and faecal samples. We determined the suitability of colonic lavage samples to see if it had comparable microbial diversity composition to colonic biopsies as they are without the limitations associated with sample size. We collected paired colonic biopsies and lavage samples from subjects who were attending for colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing and qPCR validation were performed with multiple bioinformatics analyses to determine the composition and predict function of the microbiota. Colonic lavage samples contained significantly higher numbers of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) compared to corresponding biopsy samples, however, diversity and evenness between lavage and biopsy samples were similar. The differences seen were driven by the presence of 12 OTUs which were in higher relative abundance in biopsies and were either not present or in low relative abundance in lavage samples, whilst a further 3 OTUs were present in higher amounts in the lavage samples compared to biopsy samples. However, predicted functional community profiling based on 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) data indicated minimal differences between sample types. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that colonic lavage samples provide a relatively accurate representation of biopsy microbiota composition and should be considered where biopsy size is an issue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5123352/ /pubmed/27884202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Watt, Euan
Gemmell, Matthew R.
Berry, Susan
Glaire, Mark
Farquharson, Freda
Louis, Petra
Murray, Graeme I.
El-Omar, Emad
Hold, Georgina L.
Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies
title Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies
title_full Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies
title_fullStr Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies
title_short Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies
title_sort extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis—assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27884202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0207-9
work_keys_str_mv AT watteuan extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies
AT gemmellmatthewr extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies
AT berrysusan extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies
AT glairemark extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies
AT farquharsonfreda extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies
AT louispetra extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies
AT murraygraemei extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies
AT elomaremad extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies
AT holdgeorginal extendingcolonicmucosalmicrobiomeanalysisassessmentofcoloniclavageasaproxyforendoscopiccolonicbiopsies