Cargando…

Quantitative genetic analysis of the bTB diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT)

BACKGROUND: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a disease of significant economic importance and is a persistent animal health problem with implications for public health worldwide. Control of bTB in the UK has relied on diagnosis through the single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT). However, l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsairidou, Smaragda, Brotherstone, Susan, Coffey, Mike, Bishop, Stephen C., Woolliams, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27884111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0264-3
_version_ 1782469718342369280
author Tsairidou, Smaragda
Brotherstone, Susan
Coffey, Mike
Bishop, Stephen C.
Woolliams, John A.
author_facet Tsairidou, Smaragda
Brotherstone, Susan
Coffey, Mike
Bishop, Stephen C.
Woolliams, John A.
author_sort Tsairidou, Smaragda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a disease of significant economic importance and is a persistent animal health problem with implications for public health worldwide. Control of bTB in the UK has relied on diagnosis through the single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT). However, limitations in the sensitivity of this test hinder successful eradication and the control of bTB remains a major challenge. Genetic selection for cattle that are more resistant to bTB infection can assist in bTB control. The aim of this study was to conduct a quantitative genetic analysis of SICCT measurements collected during bTB herd testing. Genetic selection for bTB resistance will be partially informed by SICCT-based diagnosis; therefore it is important to know whether, in addition to increasing bTB resistance, this might also alter genetically the epidemiological characteristics of SICCT. RESULTS: Our main findings are that: (1) the SICCT test is robust at the genetic level, since its hierarchy and comparative nature provide substantial protection against random genetic changes that arise from genetic drift and from correlated responses among its components due to either natural or artificial selection; (2) the comparative nature of SICCT provides effective control for initial skin thickness and age-dependent differences; and (3) continuous variation in SICCT is only lowly heritable and has a weak correlation with SICCT positivity among healthy animals which was not significantly different from zero (P > 0.05). These emerging results demonstrate that genetic selection for bTB resistance is unlikely to change the probability of correctly identifying non-infected animals, i.e. the test’s specificity, while reducing the overall number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study cannot exclude all theoretical risks from selection on resistance to bTB infection but the role of SICCT in disease control is unlikely to be rapidly undermined, with any adverse correlated responses expected to be weak and slow, which allow them to be monitored and managed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0264-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5123354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51233542016-12-06 Quantitative genetic analysis of the bTB diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT) Tsairidou, Smaragda Brotherstone, Susan Coffey, Mike Bishop, Stephen C. Woolliams, John A. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a disease of significant economic importance and is a persistent animal health problem with implications for public health worldwide. Control of bTB in the UK has relied on diagnosis through the single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT). However, limitations in the sensitivity of this test hinder successful eradication and the control of bTB remains a major challenge. Genetic selection for cattle that are more resistant to bTB infection can assist in bTB control. The aim of this study was to conduct a quantitative genetic analysis of SICCT measurements collected during bTB herd testing. Genetic selection for bTB resistance will be partially informed by SICCT-based diagnosis; therefore it is important to know whether, in addition to increasing bTB resistance, this might also alter genetically the epidemiological characteristics of SICCT. RESULTS: Our main findings are that: (1) the SICCT test is robust at the genetic level, since its hierarchy and comparative nature provide substantial protection against random genetic changes that arise from genetic drift and from correlated responses among its components due to either natural or artificial selection; (2) the comparative nature of SICCT provides effective control for initial skin thickness and age-dependent differences; and (3) continuous variation in SICCT is only lowly heritable and has a weak correlation with SICCT positivity among healthy animals which was not significantly different from zero (P > 0.05). These emerging results demonstrate that genetic selection for bTB resistance is unlikely to change the probability of correctly identifying non-infected animals, i.e. the test’s specificity, while reducing the overall number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study cannot exclude all theoretical risks from selection on resistance to bTB infection but the role of SICCT in disease control is unlikely to be rapidly undermined, with any adverse correlated responses expected to be weak and slow, which allow them to be monitored and managed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0264-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5123354/ /pubmed/27884111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0264-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tsairidou, Smaragda
Brotherstone, Susan
Coffey, Mike
Bishop, Stephen C.
Woolliams, John A.
Quantitative genetic analysis of the bTB diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT)
title Quantitative genetic analysis of the bTB diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT)
title_full Quantitative genetic analysis of the bTB diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT)
title_fullStr Quantitative genetic analysis of the bTB diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT)
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative genetic analysis of the bTB diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT)
title_short Quantitative genetic analysis of the bTB diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT)
title_sort quantitative genetic analysis of the btb diagnostic single intradermal comparative cervical test (sicct)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27884111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0264-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tsairidousmaragda quantitativegeneticanalysisofthebtbdiagnosticsingleintradermalcomparativecervicaltestsicct
AT brotherstonesusan quantitativegeneticanalysisofthebtbdiagnosticsingleintradermalcomparativecervicaltestsicct
AT coffeymike quantitativegeneticanalysisofthebtbdiagnosticsingleintradermalcomparativecervicaltestsicct
AT bishopstephenc quantitativegeneticanalysisofthebtbdiagnosticsingleintradermalcomparativecervicaltestsicct
AT woolliamsjohna quantitativegeneticanalysisofthebtbdiagnosticsingleintradermalcomparativecervicaltestsicct