Cargando…

Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis

Some say that world science has become more ‘applied’, or at least more ‘application-oriented’, in recent years. Replacing the ill-defined distinction between ‘basic research’ and ‘applied research’, we introduce ‘research application orientation’ domains as an alternative conceptual and analytical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tijssen, Robert J. W., Winnink, Jos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2041-z
_version_ 1782469796395220992
author Tijssen, Robert J. W.
Winnink, Jos
author_facet Tijssen, Robert J. W.
Winnink, Jos
author_sort Tijssen, Robert J. W.
collection PubMed
description Some say that world science has become more ‘applied’, or at least more ‘application-oriented’, in recent years. Replacing the ill-defined distinction between ‘basic research’ and ‘applied research’, we introduce ‘research application orientation’ domains as an alternative conceptual and analytical framework for examining research output growth patterns. To distinguish possible developmental trajectories we define three institutional domains: ‘university’, ‘industry’, ‘hospitals’. Our macro-level bibliometric analysis takes a closer look at general trends within and across some 750 of the world’s largest research-intensive universities. To correct for database changes, our time-series analysis was applied to both a fixed journal set (same research journals and conference proceedings over time) and a dynamic journal set (changing set of publication outlets). We find that output growth in the ‘hospital research orientation’ has significantly outpaced the other two application domains, especially since 2006/2007. This happened mainly because of the introduction of new publication outlets in the WoS, but also partially because some universities—especially in China—seem to have become more visible in this domain. Our analytical approach needs further broadening and deepening to provide a more definitive answer whether hospitals and the medical sector are becoming increasingly dominant as a domain of scientific knowledge production and an environment for research applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5124047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51240472016-12-09 Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis Tijssen, Robert J. W. Winnink, Jos Scientometrics Article Some say that world science has become more ‘applied’, or at least more ‘application-oriented’, in recent years. Replacing the ill-defined distinction between ‘basic research’ and ‘applied research’, we introduce ‘research application orientation’ domains as an alternative conceptual and analytical framework for examining research output growth patterns. To distinguish possible developmental trajectories we define three institutional domains: ‘university’, ‘industry’, ‘hospitals’. Our macro-level bibliometric analysis takes a closer look at general trends within and across some 750 of the world’s largest research-intensive universities. To correct for database changes, our time-series analysis was applied to both a fixed journal set (same research journals and conference proceedings over time) and a dynamic journal set (changing set of publication outlets). We find that output growth in the ‘hospital research orientation’ has significantly outpaced the other two application domains, especially since 2006/2007. This happened mainly because of the introduction of new publication outlets in the WoS, but also partially because some universities—especially in China—seem to have become more visible in this domain. Our analytical approach needs further broadening and deepening to provide a more definitive answer whether hospitals and the medical sector are becoming increasingly dominant as a domain of scientific knowledge production and an environment for research applications. Springer Netherlands 2016-07-02 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5124047/ /pubmed/27942087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2041-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Tijssen, Robert J. W.
Winnink, Jos
Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
title Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
title_full Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
title_fullStr Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
title_full_unstemmed Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
title_short Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
title_sort twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2041-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tijssenrobertjw twentyfirstcenturymacrotrendsintheinstitutionalfabricofsciencebibliometricmonitoringandanalysis
AT winninkjos twentyfirstcenturymacrotrendsintheinstitutionalfabricofsciencebibliometricmonitoringandanalysis