Cargando…
Why is prone positioning so unpopular?
Recent studies have shown acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to be underdiagnosed and inadequately treated, as evidenced by underutilization of low-tidal volume ventilation. Despite a proven survival benefit in patients with severe ARDS, studies have also shown underutilization of prone posi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27933169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0194-8 |
_version_ | 1782469822843453440 |
---|---|
author | Chertoff, Jason |
author_facet | Chertoff, Jason |
author_sort | Chertoff, Jason |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent studies have shown acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to be underdiagnosed and inadequately treated, as evidenced by underutilization of low-tidal volume ventilation. Despite a proven survival benefit in patients with severe ARDS, studies have also shown underutilization of prone positioning. Many questions persist as to the reasons for prone positioning’s unpopularity. Additional studies are required to uncover the causes of this prone positioning underutilization phenomenon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5124227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51242272016-12-08 Why is prone positioning so unpopular? Chertoff, Jason J Intensive Care Commentary Recent studies have shown acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to be underdiagnosed and inadequately treated, as evidenced by underutilization of low-tidal volume ventilation. Despite a proven survival benefit in patients with severe ARDS, studies have also shown underutilization of prone positioning. Many questions persist as to the reasons for prone positioning’s unpopularity. Additional studies are required to uncover the causes of this prone positioning underutilization phenomenon. BioMed Central 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5124227/ /pubmed/27933169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0194-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Chertoff, Jason Why is prone positioning so unpopular? |
title | Why is prone positioning so unpopular? |
title_full | Why is prone positioning so unpopular? |
title_fullStr | Why is prone positioning so unpopular? |
title_full_unstemmed | Why is prone positioning so unpopular? |
title_short | Why is prone positioning so unpopular? |
title_sort | why is prone positioning so unpopular? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27933169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0194-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chertoffjason whyispronepositioningsounpopular |