Cargando…
Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: A randomized phase III Intergroup study by EORTC/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU (EORTC 22033-26033)
BACKGROUND: Outcome of low-grade glioma (LGG, WHO grade II) is highly variable reflecting molecular heterogeneity of the disease. We compared two different single modality treatment strategies: standard radiotherapy (RT) versus primary temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy with the aim of tailoring treatm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27686946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30313-8 |
_version_ | 1782469865251012608 |
---|---|
author | Baumert, Brigitta G. Hegi, Monika E. van den Bent, Martin J. von Deimling, Andreas Gorlia, Thierry Hoang-Xuan, Khê Brandes, Alba A. Kantor, Guy Taphoorn, Martin J.B. Hassel, Mohamed Ben Hartmann, Christian Ryan, Gail Capper, David Kros, Johan M. Kurscheid, Sebastian Wick, Wolfgang Enting, Roelien Reni, Michele Thiessen, Brian Dhermain, Frederic Bromberg, Jacoline E. Feuvret, Loic Reijneveld, Jaap C. Chinot, Olivier Gijtenbeek, Johanna M. M. Rossiter, John P. Dif, Nicolas Balana, Carmen Bravo-Marques, Jose Clement, Paul M. Marosi, Christine Tzuk-Shina, Tzahala Nordal, Robert A. Rees, Jeremy Lacombe, Denis Mason, Warren P. Stupp, Roger |
author_facet | Baumert, Brigitta G. Hegi, Monika E. van den Bent, Martin J. von Deimling, Andreas Gorlia, Thierry Hoang-Xuan, Khê Brandes, Alba A. Kantor, Guy Taphoorn, Martin J.B. Hassel, Mohamed Ben Hartmann, Christian Ryan, Gail Capper, David Kros, Johan M. Kurscheid, Sebastian Wick, Wolfgang Enting, Roelien Reni, Michele Thiessen, Brian Dhermain, Frederic Bromberg, Jacoline E. Feuvret, Loic Reijneveld, Jaap C. Chinot, Olivier Gijtenbeek, Johanna M. M. Rossiter, John P. Dif, Nicolas Balana, Carmen Bravo-Marques, Jose Clement, Paul M. Marosi, Christine Tzuk-Shina, Tzahala Nordal, Robert A. Rees, Jeremy Lacombe, Denis Mason, Warren P. Stupp, Roger |
author_sort | Baumert, Brigitta G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Outcome of low-grade glioma (LGG, WHO grade II) is highly variable reflecting molecular heterogeneity of the disease. We compared two different single modality treatment strategies: standard radiotherapy (RT) versus primary temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy with the aim of tailoring treatment and identifying predictive molecular factors. METHODS: 477 patients (2005 – 2012, median FU 48 months) with a low-grade glioma (astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, WHO grade II) with at least one high-risk feature (age > 40 years, progressive disease, tumor > 5 cm or crossing the midline, neurological symptoms (e.g. focal or mental deficits, increased intracranial pressure or intractable seizures)) were, after stratification by chromosome 1p-status, randomized to either conformal RT (50.4 Gy/28 fractions) or dose-dense TMZ (75 mg/m(2) daily × 21 days, q28 days, max. 12 cycles). Random treatment allocation was performed online using a minimization technique. A planned analysis was performed after 246 progression events. All analyses are intent to treat. Primary clinical endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), correlative analyses included molecular markers (1p/19q co-deletion, MGMT methylation status, IDH1+2 mutations). The trial has been registered at the European Trials Registry (EudraCT 2004-002714-11) and at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00182819). FINDINGS: Four hundred seventy-seven patients were randomized. Severe hematological toxicity occurred in 14% of TMZ-treated patients, infections in 3% of TMZ-treated patients, and 1% of RT-treated patients. Moderate to severe fatigue was recorded in 3% of patients in the RT group and 7% in the TMZ group. At a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR:31–56), median PFS was 39 months (IQR:16–46) in the TMZ arm and 46 months (IQR:19–48) in the RT group (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% CI, 0.9–1.5; p=0.22). Median OS has not been reached. Exploratory analyses identified treatment-dependent variation in outcome of molecular LGG subgroups (n=318). INTERPRETATION: There was no significant difference in outcome of the overall patient population treated with either radiotherapy alone or TMZ chemotherapy alone. Further data maturation is needed for overall survival analyses and evaluation of the full predictive impact of the molecular subtypes for individualized treatment choices. FUNDING: Merck & Co, Swiss-Bridge Award 2011, Swiss Cancer League. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5124485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51244852017-11-01 Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: A randomized phase III Intergroup study by EORTC/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU (EORTC 22033-26033) Baumert, Brigitta G. Hegi, Monika E. van den Bent, Martin J. von Deimling, Andreas Gorlia, Thierry Hoang-Xuan, Khê Brandes, Alba A. Kantor, Guy Taphoorn, Martin J.B. Hassel, Mohamed Ben Hartmann, Christian Ryan, Gail Capper, David Kros, Johan M. Kurscheid, Sebastian Wick, Wolfgang Enting, Roelien Reni, Michele Thiessen, Brian Dhermain, Frederic Bromberg, Jacoline E. Feuvret, Loic Reijneveld, Jaap C. Chinot, Olivier Gijtenbeek, Johanna M. M. Rossiter, John P. Dif, Nicolas Balana, Carmen Bravo-Marques, Jose Clement, Paul M. Marosi, Christine Tzuk-Shina, Tzahala Nordal, Robert A. Rees, Jeremy Lacombe, Denis Mason, Warren P. Stupp, Roger Lancet Oncol Article BACKGROUND: Outcome of low-grade glioma (LGG, WHO grade II) is highly variable reflecting molecular heterogeneity of the disease. We compared two different single modality treatment strategies: standard radiotherapy (RT) versus primary temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy with the aim of tailoring treatment and identifying predictive molecular factors. METHODS: 477 patients (2005 – 2012, median FU 48 months) with a low-grade glioma (astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, WHO grade II) with at least one high-risk feature (age > 40 years, progressive disease, tumor > 5 cm or crossing the midline, neurological symptoms (e.g. focal or mental deficits, increased intracranial pressure or intractable seizures)) were, after stratification by chromosome 1p-status, randomized to either conformal RT (50.4 Gy/28 fractions) or dose-dense TMZ (75 mg/m(2) daily × 21 days, q28 days, max. 12 cycles). Random treatment allocation was performed online using a minimization technique. A planned analysis was performed after 246 progression events. All analyses are intent to treat. Primary clinical endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), correlative analyses included molecular markers (1p/19q co-deletion, MGMT methylation status, IDH1+2 mutations). The trial has been registered at the European Trials Registry (EudraCT 2004-002714-11) and at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00182819). FINDINGS: Four hundred seventy-seven patients were randomized. Severe hematological toxicity occurred in 14% of TMZ-treated patients, infections in 3% of TMZ-treated patients, and 1% of RT-treated patients. Moderate to severe fatigue was recorded in 3% of patients in the RT group and 7% in the TMZ group. At a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR:31–56), median PFS was 39 months (IQR:16–46) in the TMZ arm and 46 months (IQR:19–48) in the RT group (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% CI, 0.9–1.5; p=0.22). Median OS has not been reached. Exploratory analyses identified treatment-dependent variation in outcome of molecular LGG subgroups (n=318). INTERPRETATION: There was no significant difference in outcome of the overall patient population treated with either radiotherapy alone or TMZ chemotherapy alone. Further data maturation is needed for overall survival analyses and evaluation of the full predictive impact of the molecular subtypes for individualized treatment choices. FUNDING: Merck & Co, Swiss-Bridge Award 2011, Swiss Cancer League. 2016-09-27 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5124485/ /pubmed/27686946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30313-8 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. |
spellingShingle | Article Baumert, Brigitta G. Hegi, Monika E. van den Bent, Martin J. von Deimling, Andreas Gorlia, Thierry Hoang-Xuan, Khê Brandes, Alba A. Kantor, Guy Taphoorn, Martin J.B. Hassel, Mohamed Ben Hartmann, Christian Ryan, Gail Capper, David Kros, Johan M. Kurscheid, Sebastian Wick, Wolfgang Enting, Roelien Reni, Michele Thiessen, Brian Dhermain, Frederic Bromberg, Jacoline E. Feuvret, Loic Reijneveld, Jaap C. Chinot, Olivier Gijtenbeek, Johanna M. M. Rossiter, John P. Dif, Nicolas Balana, Carmen Bravo-Marques, Jose Clement, Paul M. Marosi, Christine Tzuk-Shina, Tzahala Nordal, Robert A. Rees, Jeremy Lacombe, Denis Mason, Warren P. Stupp, Roger Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: A randomized phase III Intergroup study by EORTC/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU (EORTC 22033-26033) |
title | Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: A randomized phase III Intergroup study by EORTC/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU (EORTC 22033-26033) |
title_full | Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: A randomized phase III Intergroup study by EORTC/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU (EORTC 22033-26033) |
title_fullStr | Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: A randomized phase III Intergroup study by EORTC/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU (EORTC 22033-26033) |
title_full_unstemmed | Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: A randomized phase III Intergroup study by EORTC/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU (EORTC 22033-26033) |
title_short | Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: A randomized phase III Intergroup study by EORTC/NCIC-CTG/TROG/MRC-CTU (EORTC 22033-26033) |
title_sort | temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma: a randomized phase iii intergroup study by eortc/ncic-ctg/trog/mrc-ctu (eortc 22033-26033) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27686946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30313-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baumertbrigittag temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT hegimonikae temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT vandenbentmartinj temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT vondeimlingandreas temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT gorliathierry temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT hoangxuankhe temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT brandesalbaa temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT kantorguy temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT taphoornmartinjb temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT hasselmohamedben temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT hartmannchristian temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT ryangail temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT capperdavid temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT krosjohanm temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT kurscheidsebastian temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT wickwolfgang temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT entingroelien temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT renimichele temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT thiessenbrian temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT dhermainfrederic temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT brombergjacolinee temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT feuvretloic temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT reijneveldjaapc temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT chinotolivier temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT gijtenbeekjohannamm temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT rossiterjohnp temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT difnicolas temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT balanacarmen temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT bravomarquesjose temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT clementpaulm temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT marosichristine temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT tzukshinatzahala temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT nordalroberta temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT reesjeremy temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT lacombedenis temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT masonwarrenp temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 AT stupproger temozolomidechemotherapyversusradiotherapyinhighrisklowgradegliomaarandomizedphaseiiiintergroupstudybyeortcncicctgtrogmrcctueortc2203326033 |