Cargando…
Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the work was to estimate the dose received by the heart throughout a course of breath-holding breast radiotherapy. METHODS: 113 cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for 20 patients treated within the HeartSpare 1A study, in which both an active breathing control (ABC) de...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160536 |
_version_ | 1782469897936175104 |
---|---|
author | Dunkerley, Nicolle Bartlett, Frederick R Kirby, Anna M Evans, Philip M Donovan, Ellen M |
author_facet | Dunkerley, Nicolle Bartlett, Frederick R Kirby, Anna M Evans, Philip M Donovan, Ellen M |
author_sort | Dunkerley, Nicolle |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the work was to estimate the dose received by the heart throughout a course of breath-holding breast radiotherapy. METHODS: 113 cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for 20 patients treated within the HeartSpare 1A study, in which both an active breathing control (ABC) device and a voluntary breath-hold (VBH) method were used. Predicted mean heart doses were obtained from treatment plans. CBCT scans were imported into a treatment planning system, heart outlines defined, images registered to the CT planning scan and mean heart dose recorded. Two observers outlined two cases three times each to assess interobserver and intraobserver variation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between ABC and VBH heart dose data from CT planning scans, or in the CBCT-based estimates of heart dose, and no effect from the order of the breath-hold method. Variation in mean heart dose per fraction over the three imaged fractions was <6 cGy without setup correction, decreasing to 3.3 cGy with setup correction. If scaled to 15 fractions, all differences between predicted and estimated mean heart doses were <0.5 Gy and in 80% of cases, they were <0.25 Gy. CONCLUSION: Variation in mean heart dose was at an acceptable level over the duration of breath-holding radiotherapy and was well predicted by the planning system. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Mean heart dose was not adversely affected by fraction-to-fraction variations throughout a course of heart-sparing radiotherapy using two well-established breath-holding methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5124850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51248502016-12-15 Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy Dunkerley, Nicolle Bartlett, Frederick R Kirby, Anna M Evans, Philip M Donovan, Ellen M Br J Radiol Short Communication OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the work was to estimate the dose received by the heart throughout a course of breath-holding breast radiotherapy. METHODS: 113 cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for 20 patients treated within the HeartSpare 1A study, in which both an active breathing control (ABC) device and a voluntary breath-hold (VBH) method were used. Predicted mean heart doses were obtained from treatment plans. CBCT scans were imported into a treatment planning system, heart outlines defined, images registered to the CT planning scan and mean heart dose recorded. Two observers outlined two cases three times each to assess interobserver and intraobserver variation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between ABC and VBH heart dose data from CT planning scans, or in the CBCT-based estimates of heart dose, and no effect from the order of the breath-hold method. Variation in mean heart dose per fraction over the three imaged fractions was <6 cGy without setup correction, decreasing to 3.3 cGy with setup correction. If scaled to 15 fractions, all differences between predicted and estimated mean heart doses were <0.5 Gy and in 80% of cases, they were <0.25 Gy. CONCLUSION: Variation in mean heart dose was at an acceptable level over the duration of breath-holding radiotherapy and was well predicted by the planning system. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Mean heart dose was not adversely affected by fraction-to-fraction variations throughout a course of heart-sparing radiotherapy using two well-established breath-holding methods. The British Institute of Radiology. 2016-11 2016-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5124850/ /pubmed/27579712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160536 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Dunkerley, Nicolle Bartlett, Frederick R Kirby, Anna M Evans, Philip M Donovan, Ellen M Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy |
title | Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_full | Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_short | Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_sort | mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunkerleynicolle meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy AT bartlettfrederickr meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy AT kirbyannam meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy AT evansphilipm meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy AT donovanellenm meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy |