Cargando…

Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the work was to estimate the dose received by the heart throughout a course of breath-holding breast radiotherapy. METHODS: 113 cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for 20 patients treated within the HeartSpare 1A study, in which both an active breathing control (ABC) de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunkerley, Nicolle, Bartlett, Frederick R, Kirby, Anna M, Evans, Philip M, Donovan, Ellen M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160536
_version_ 1782469897936175104
author Dunkerley, Nicolle
Bartlett, Frederick R
Kirby, Anna M
Evans, Philip M
Donovan, Ellen M
author_facet Dunkerley, Nicolle
Bartlett, Frederick R
Kirby, Anna M
Evans, Philip M
Donovan, Ellen M
author_sort Dunkerley, Nicolle
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the work was to estimate the dose received by the heart throughout a course of breath-holding breast radiotherapy. METHODS: 113 cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for 20 patients treated within the HeartSpare 1A study, in which both an active breathing control (ABC) device and a voluntary breath-hold (VBH) method were used. Predicted mean heart doses were obtained from treatment plans. CBCT scans were imported into a treatment planning system, heart outlines defined, images registered to the CT planning scan and mean heart dose recorded. Two observers outlined two cases three times each to assess interobserver and intraobserver variation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between ABC and VBH heart dose data from CT planning scans, or in the CBCT-based estimates of heart dose, and no effect from the order of the breath-hold method. Variation in mean heart dose per fraction over the three imaged fractions was <6 cGy without setup correction, decreasing to 3.3 cGy with setup correction. If scaled to 15 fractions, all differences between predicted and estimated mean heart doses were <0.5 Gy and in 80% of cases, they were <0.25 Gy. CONCLUSION: Variation in mean heart dose was at an acceptable level over the duration of breath-holding radiotherapy and was well predicted by the planning system. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Mean heart dose was not adversely affected by fraction-to-fraction variations throughout a course of heart-sparing radiotherapy using two well-established breath-holding methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5124850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51248502016-12-15 Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy Dunkerley, Nicolle Bartlett, Frederick R Kirby, Anna M Evans, Philip M Donovan, Ellen M Br J Radiol Short Communication OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the work was to estimate the dose received by the heart throughout a course of breath-holding breast radiotherapy. METHODS: 113 cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for 20 patients treated within the HeartSpare 1A study, in which both an active breathing control (ABC) device and a voluntary breath-hold (VBH) method were used. Predicted mean heart doses were obtained from treatment plans. CBCT scans were imported into a treatment planning system, heart outlines defined, images registered to the CT planning scan and mean heart dose recorded. Two observers outlined two cases three times each to assess interobserver and intraobserver variation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between ABC and VBH heart dose data from CT planning scans, or in the CBCT-based estimates of heart dose, and no effect from the order of the breath-hold method. Variation in mean heart dose per fraction over the three imaged fractions was <6 cGy without setup correction, decreasing to 3.3 cGy with setup correction. If scaled to 15 fractions, all differences between predicted and estimated mean heart doses were <0.5 Gy and in 80% of cases, they were <0.25 Gy. CONCLUSION: Variation in mean heart dose was at an acceptable level over the duration of breath-holding radiotherapy and was well predicted by the planning system. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Mean heart dose was not adversely affected by fraction-to-fraction variations throughout a course of heart-sparing radiotherapy using two well-established breath-holding methods. The British Institute of Radiology. 2016-11 2016-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5124850/ /pubmed/27579712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160536 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Dunkerley, Nicolle
Bartlett, Frederick R
Kirby, Anna M
Evans, Philip M
Donovan, Ellen M
Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
title Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
title_full Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
title_fullStr Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
title_short Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
title_sort mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160536
work_keys_str_mv AT dunkerleynicolle meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT bartlettfrederickr meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT kirbyannam meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT evansphilipm meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT donovanellenm meanheartdosevariationoveracourseofbreathholdingbreastcancerradiotherapy