Cargando…

Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review

Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have emerged as a new application in percutaneous coronary intervention. DEBs have proven successful in the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but their role in de novo lesions is less clear. This paper provides a review of the current studies where DEBs have been used in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richelsen, Rasmus Kapalu Broge, Overvad, Thure Filskov, Jensen, Svend Eggert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27384194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-016-0064-4
_version_ 1782469931358486528
author Richelsen, Rasmus Kapalu Broge
Overvad, Thure Filskov
Jensen, Svend Eggert
author_facet Richelsen, Rasmus Kapalu Broge
Overvad, Thure Filskov
Jensen, Svend Eggert
author_sort Richelsen, Rasmus Kapalu Broge
collection PubMed
description Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have emerged as a new application in percutaneous coronary intervention. DEBs have proven successful in the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but their role in de novo lesions is less clear. This paper provides a review of the current studies where DEBs have been used in coronary de novo lesions, either as part of a DEB-only strategy or in combination with another device, mainly a bare metal stent (BMS). By searching Pubmed and Embase we were able to identify 52 relevant studies, differing in design, intervention, and clinical setting, including patients with small vessel disease, bifurcation lesions, complex long lesions, acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and elderly. In 23 studies, a DEB was combined with a BMS, 25 studies used a DEB-only strategy with only provisional BMS implantation, and four studies combined a DEB with a drug-eluting stent (DES). In the vast majority of studies, DEB in combination with BMS does not seem to improve clinical or angiographic outcome compared with DES, whereas a DEB-only strategy seems promising, especially when predilatation and geographical mismatch are taken into account. A lower risk of recurrent thrombosis with DEB compared with DES is not evident from the current studies. In conclusion, the main indication for DEB seems to be small vessel disease, especially in clinical scenarios in which a contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy exists. The main approach should be a DEB-only strategy with only provisional bailout stenting, which has shown interesting results in different clinical scenarios. In general, larger randomized controlled studies with prolonged follow-up comparing DEB with best in class DES are warranted. Technical developments of DEBs including the use of different drugs might potentially improve the efficacy of such treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40119-016-0064-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5125107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51251072016-12-12 Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review Richelsen, Rasmus Kapalu Broge Overvad, Thure Filskov Jensen, Svend Eggert Cardiol Ther Review Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have emerged as a new application in percutaneous coronary intervention. DEBs have proven successful in the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but their role in de novo lesions is less clear. This paper provides a review of the current studies where DEBs have been used in coronary de novo lesions, either as part of a DEB-only strategy or in combination with another device, mainly a bare metal stent (BMS). By searching Pubmed and Embase we were able to identify 52 relevant studies, differing in design, intervention, and clinical setting, including patients with small vessel disease, bifurcation lesions, complex long lesions, acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and elderly. In 23 studies, a DEB was combined with a BMS, 25 studies used a DEB-only strategy with only provisional BMS implantation, and four studies combined a DEB with a drug-eluting stent (DES). In the vast majority of studies, DEB in combination with BMS does not seem to improve clinical or angiographic outcome compared with DES, whereas a DEB-only strategy seems promising, especially when predilatation and geographical mismatch are taken into account. A lower risk of recurrent thrombosis with DEB compared with DES is not evident from the current studies. In conclusion, the main indication for DEB seems to be small vessel disease, especially in clinical scenarios in which a contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy exists. The main approach should be a DEB-only strategy with only provisional bailout stenting, which has shown interesting results in different clinical scenarios. In general, larger randomized controlled studies with prolonged follow-up comparing DEB with best in class DES are warranted. Technical developments of DEBs including the use of different drugs might potentially improve the efficacy of such treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40119-016-0064-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2016-07-06 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5125107/ /pubmed/27384194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-016-0064-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Richelsen, Rasmus Kapalu Broge
Overvad, Thure Filskov
Jensen, Svend Eggert
Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review
title Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review
title_full Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review
title_fullStr Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review
title_full_unstemmed Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review
title_short Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review
title_sort drug-eluting balloons in the treatment of coronary de novo lesions: a comprehensive review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27384194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-016-0064-4
work_keys_str_mv AT richelsenrasmuskapalubroge drugelutingballoonsinthetreatmentofcoronarydenovolesionsacomprehensivereview
AT overvadthurefilskov drugelutingballoonsinthetreatmentofcoronarydenovolesionsacomprehensivereview
AT jensensvendeggert drugelutingballoonsinthetreatmentofcoronarydenovolesionsacomprehensivereview