Cargando…
Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Students are exposed to basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training in the first semester in some medical colleges. The aim of this study was to compare students’ satisfaction between lecture-based traditional method and hybrid problem-based learni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.193669 |
_version_ | 1782469945323421696 |
---|---|
author | Chilkoti, Geetanjali Mohta, Medha Wadhwa, Rachna Saxena, Ashok Kumar Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet Shankar, Neelima |
author_facet | Chilkoti, Geetanjali Mohta, Medha Wadhwa, Rachna Saxena, Ashok Kumar Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet Shankar, Neelima |
author_sort | Chilkoti, Geetanjali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Students are exposed to basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training in the first semester in some medical colleges. The aim of this study was to compare students’ satisfaction between lecture-based traditional method and hybrid problem-based learning (PBL) in BLS/ACLS teaching to undergraduate medical students. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey among 118 1(st)-year medical students from a university medical college in the city of New Delhi, India. We aimed to assess the students’ satisfaction between lecture-based and hybrid-PBL method in BLS/ACLS teaching. Likert 5-point scale was used to assess students’ satisfaction levels between the two teaching methods. Data were collected and scores regarding the students’ satisfaction levels between these two teaching methods were analysed using a two-sided paired t-test. RESULTS: Most students preferred hybrid-PBL format over traditional lecture-based method in the following four aspects; learning and understanding, interest and motivation, training of personal abilities and being confident and satisfied with the teaching method (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of hybrid-PBL format along with the lecture-based method in BLS/ACLS teaching provided high satisfaction among undergraduate medical students. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5125185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51251852016-12-09 Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching Chilkoti, Geetanjali Mohta, Medha Wadhwa, Rachna Saxena, Ashok Kumar Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet Shankar, Neelima Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Students are exposed to basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training in the first semester in some medical colleges. The aim of this study was to compare students’ satisfaction between lecture-based traditional method and hybrid problem-based learning (PBL) in BLS/ACLS teaching to undergraduate medical students. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey among 118 1(st)-year medical students from a university medical college in the city of New Delhi, India. We aimed to assess the students’ satisfaction between lecture-based and hybrid-PBL method in BLS/ACLS teaching. Likert 5-point scale was used to assess students’ satisfaction levels between the two teaching methods. Data were collected and scores regarding the students’ satisfaction levels between these two teaching methods were analysed using a two-sided paired t-test. RESULTS: Most students preferred hybrid-PBL format over traditional lecture-based method in the following four aspects; learning and understanding, interest and motivation, training of personal abilities and being confident and satisfied with the teaching method (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of hybrid-PBL format along with the lecture-based method in BLS/ACLS teaching provided high satisfaction among undergraduate medical students. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5125185/ /pubmed/27942055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.193669 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chilkoti, Geetanjali Mohta, Medha Wadhwa, Rachna Saxena, Ashok Kumar Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet Shankar, Neelima Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching |
title | Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching |
title_full | Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching |
title_fullStr | Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching |
title_full_unstemmed | Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching |
title_short | Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching |
title_sort | students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.193669 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chilkotigeetanjali studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching AT mohtamedha studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching AT wadhwarachna studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching AT saxenaashokkumar studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching AT sharmachhavisarabpreet studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching AT shankarneelima studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching |