Cargando…

Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Students are exposed to basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training in the first semester in some medical colleges. The aim of this study was to compare students’ satisfaction between lecture-based traditional method and hybrid problem-based learni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chilkoti, Geetanjali, Mohta, Medha, Wadhwa, Rachna, Saxena, Ashok Kumar, Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet, Shankar, Neelima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.193669
_version_ 1782469945323421696
author Chilkoti, Geetanjali
Mohta, Medha
Wadhwa, Rachna
Saxena, Ashok Kumar
Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet
Shankar, Neelima
author_facet Chilkoti, Geetanjali
Mohta, Medha
Wadhwa, Rachna
Saxena, Ashok Kumar
Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet
Shankar, Neelima
author_sort Chilkoti, Geetanjali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Students are exposed to basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training in the first semester in some medical colleges. The aim of this study was to compare students’ satisfaction between lecture-based traditional method and hybrid problem-based learning (PBL) in BLS/ACLS teaching to undergraduate medical students. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey among 118 1(st)-year medical students from a university medical college in the city of New Delhi, India. We aimed to assess the students’ satisfaction between lecture-based and hybrid-PBL method in BLS/ACLS teaching. Likert 5-point scale was used to assess students’ satisfaction levels between the two teaching methods. Data were collected and scores regarding the students’ satisfaction levels between these two teaching methods were analysed using a two-sided paired t-test. RESULTS: Most students preferred hybrid-PBL format over traditional lecture-based method in the following four aspects; learning and understanding, interest and motivation, training of personal abilities and being confident and satisfied with the teaching method (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of hybrid-PBL format along with the lecture-based method in BLS/ACLS teaching provided high satisfaction among undergraduate medical students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5125185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51251852016-12-09 Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching Chilkoti, Geetanjali Mohta, Medha Wadhwa, Rachna Saxena, Ashok Kumar Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet Shankar, Neelima Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Students are exposed to basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training in the first semester in some medical colleges. The aim of this study was to compare students’ satisfaction between lecture-based traditional method and hybrid problem-based learning (PBL) in BLS/ACLS teaching to undergraduate medical students. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey among 118 1(st)-year medical students from a university medical college in the city of New Delhi, India. We aimed to assess the students’ satisfaction between lecture-based and hybrid-PBL method in BLS/ACLS teaching. Likert 5-point scale was used to assess students’ satisfaction levels between the two teaching methods. Data were collected and scores regarding the students’ satisfaction levels between these two teaching methods were analysed using a two-sided paired t-test. RESULTS: Most students preferred hybrid-PBL format over traditional lecture-based method in the following four aspects; learning and understanding, interest and motivation, training of personal abilities and being confident and satisfied with the teaching method (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of hybrid-PBL format along with the lecture-based method in BLS/ACLS teaching provided high satisfaction among undergraduate medical students. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5125185/ /pubmed/27942055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.193669 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chilkoti, Geetanjali
Mohta, Medha
Wadhwa, Rachna
Saxena, Ashok Kumar
Sharma, Chhavi Sarabpreet
Shankar, Neelima
Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching
title Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching
title_full Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching
title_fullStr Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching
title_full_unstemmed Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching
title_short Students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching
title_sort students’ satisfaction to hybrid problem-based learning format for basic life support/advanced cardiac life support teaching
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.193669
work_keys_str_mv AT chilkotigeetanjali studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching
AT mohtamedha studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching
AT wadhwarachna studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching
AT saxenaashokkumar studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching
AT sharmachhavisarabpreet studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching
AT shankarneelima studentssatisfactiontohybridproblembasedlearningformatforbasiclifesupportadvancedcardiaclifesupportteaching