Cargando…
Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa
BACKGROUND: An integrated chronic disease management (ICDM) model consisting of four components (facility reorganisation, clinical supportive management, assisted self-supportive management and strengthening of support systems and structures outside the facility) has been implemented across 42 prima...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28155314 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1248 |
_version_ | 1782469951025577984 |
---|---|
author | Mahomed, Ozayr H. Asmall, Shaidah Voce, Anna |
author_facet | Mahomed, Ozayr H. Asmall, Shaidah Voce, Anna |
author_sort | Mahomed, Ozayr H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An integrated chronic disease management (ICDM) model consisting of four components (facility reorganisation, clinical supportive management, assisted self-supportive management and strengthening of support systems and structures outside the facility) has been implemented across 42 primary health care clinics in South Africa with a view to improve the operational efficiency and patient clinical outcomes. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the sustainability of the facility reorganisation and clinical support components 18 months after the initiation. SETTING: The study was conducted at 37 of the initiating clinics across three districts in three provinces of South Africa. METHODS: The National Health Service (NHS) Institute for Innovation and Improvement Sustainability Model (SM) self-assessment tool was used to assess sustainability. RESULTS: Bushbuckridge had the highest mean sustainability score of 71.79 (95% CI: 63.70–79.89) followed by West Rand Health District (70.25 (95% CI: 63.96–76.53)) and Dr Kenneth Kaunda District (66.50 (95% CI: 55.17–77.83)). Four facilities (11%) had an overall sustainability score of less than 55. CONCLUSION: The less than optimal involvement of clinical leadership (doctors), negative staff behaviour towards the ICDM, adaptability or flexibility of the model to adapt to external factors and infrastructure limitation have the potential to negatively affect the sustainability and scale-up of the model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5125260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51252602016-11-29 Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa Mahomed, Ozayr H. Asmall, Shaidah Voce, Anna Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: An integrated chronic disease management (ICDM) model consisting of four components (facility reorganisation, clinical supportive management, assisted self-supportive management and strengthening of support systems and structures outside the facility) has been implemented across 42 primary health care clinics in South Africa with a view to improve the operational efficiency and patient clinical outcomes. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the sustainability of the facility reorganisation and clinical support components 18 months after the initiation. SETTING: The study was conducted at 37 of the initiating clinics across three districts in three provinces of South Africa. METHODS: The National Health Service (NHS) Institute for Innovation and Improvement Sustainability Model (SM) self-assessment tool was used to assess sustainability. RESULTS: Bushbuckridge had the highest mean sustainability score of 71.79 (95% CI: 63.70–79.89) followed by West Rand Health District (70.25 (95% CI: 63.96–76.53)) and Dr Kenneth Kaunda District (66.50 (95% CI: 55.17–77.83)). Four facilities (11%) had an overall sustainability score of less than 55. CONCLUSION: The less than optimal involvement of clinical leadership (doctors), negative staff behaviour towards the ICDM, adaptability or flexibility of the model to adapt to external factors and infrastructure limitation have the potential to negatively affect the sustainability and scale-up of the model. AOSIS 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5125260/ /pubmed/28155314 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1248 Text en © 2016. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mahomed, Ozayr H. Asmall, Shaidah Voce, Anna Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa |
title | Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa |
title_full | Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa |
title_fullStr | Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa |
title_short | Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa |
title_sort | sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in south africa |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28155314 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahomedozayrh sustainabilityoftheintegratedchronicdiseasemanagementmodelatprimarycareclinicsinsouthafrica AT asmallshaidah sustainabilityoftheintegratedchronicdiseasemanagementmodelatprimarycareclinicsinsouthafrica AT voceanna sustainabilityoftheintegratedchronicdiseasemanagementmodelatprimarycareclinicsinsouthafrica |