Cargando…

Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa

BACKGROUND: An integrated chronic disease management (ICDM) model consisting of four components (facility reorganisation, clinical supportive management, assisted self-supportive management and strengthening of support systems and structures outside the facility) has been implemented across 42 prima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahomed, Ozayr H., Asmall, Shaidah, Voce, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28155314
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1248
_version_ 1782469951025577984
author Mahomed, Ozayr H.
Asmall, Shaidah
Voce, Anna
author_facet Mahomed, Ozayr H.
Asmall, Shaidah
Voce, Anna
author_sort Mahomed, Ozayr H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An integrated chronic disease management (ICDM) model consisting of four components (facility reorganisation, clinical supportive management, assisted self-supportive management and strengthening of support systems and structures outside the facility) has been implemented across 42 primary health care clinics in South Africa with a view to improve the operational efficiency and patient clinical outcomes. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the sustainability of the facility reorganisation and clinical support components 18 months after the initiation. SETTING: The study was conducted at 37 of the initiating clinics across three districts in three provinces of South Africa. METHODS: The National Health Service (NHS) Institute for Innovation and Improvement Sustainability Model (SM) self-assessment tool was used to assess sustainability. RESULTS: Bushbuckridge had the highest mean sustainability score of 71.79 (95% CI: 63.70–79.89) followed by West Rand Health District (70.25 (95% CI: 63.96–76.53)) and Dr Kenneth Kaunda District (66.50 (95% CI: 55.17–77.83)). Four facilities (11%) had an overall sustainability score of less than 55. CONCLUSION: The less than optimal involvement of clinical leadership (doctors), negative staff behaviour towards the ICDM, adaptability or flexibility of the model to adapt to external factors and infrastructure limitation have the potential to negatively affect the sustainability and scale-up of the model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5125260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51252602016-11-29 Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa Mahomed, Ozayr H. Asmall, Shaidah Voce, Anna Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: An integrated chronic disease management (ICDM) model consisting of four components (facility reorganisation, clinical supportive management, assisted self-supportive management and strengthening of support systems and structures outside the facility) has been implemented across 42 primary health care clinics in South Africa with a view to improve the operational efficiency and patient clinical outcomes. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the sustainability of the facility reorganisation and clinical support components 18 months after the initiation. SETTING: The study was conducted at 37 of the initiating clinics across three districts in three provinces of South Africa. METHODS: The National Health Service (NHS) Institute for Innovation and Improvement Sustainability Model (SM) self-assessment tool was used to assess sustainability. RESULTS: Bushbuckridge had the highest mean sustainability score of 71.79 (95% CI: 63.70–79.89) followed by West Rand Health District (70.25 (95% CI: 63.96–76.53)) and Dr Kenneth Kaunda District (66.50 (95% CI: 55.17–77.83)). Four facilities (11%) had an overall sustainability score of less than 55. CONCLUSION: The less than optimal involvement of clinical leadership (doctors), negative staff behaviour towards the ICDM, adaptability or flexibility of the model to adapt to external factors and infrastructure limitation have the potential to negatively affect the sustainability and scale-up of the model. AOSIS 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5125260/ /pubmed/28155314 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1248 Text en © 2016. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mahomed, Ozayr H.
Asmall, Shaidah
Voce, Anna
Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa
title Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa
title_full Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa
title_fullStr Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa
title_short Sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in South Africa
title_sort sustainability of the integrated chronic disease management model at primary care clinics in south africa
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28155314
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1248
work_keys_str_mv AT mahomedozayrh sustainabilityoftheintegratedchronicdiseasemanagementmodelatprimarycareclinicsinsouthafrica
AT asmallshaidah sustainabilityoftheintegratedchronicdiseasemanagementmodelatprimarycareclinicsinsouthafrica
AT voceanna sustainabilityoftheintegratedchronicdiseasemanagementmodelatprimarycareclinicsinsouthafrica