Cargando…

Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!

BACKGROUND: Two experiments investigated the effect of features of human behaviour on the quality of interaction with an Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA). METHODS: In Experiment 1, visual prominence cues (head nod, eyebrow raise) of the ECA were manipulated to explore the hypothesis that likeabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, Catherine J., Pinchbeck, Bronwyn, Lewis, Trent, Luerssen, Martin, Pfitzner, Darius, Powers, David M. W., Abrahamyan, Arman, Leung, Yvonne, Gibert, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40469-016-0008-2
_version_ 1782469972668186624
author Stevens, Catherine J.
Pinchbeck, Bronwyn
Lewis, Trent
Luerssen, Martin
Pfitzner, Darius
Powers, David M. W.
Abrahamyan, Arman
Leung, Yvonne
Gibert, Guillaume
author_facet Stevens, Catherine J.
Pinchbeck, Bronwyn
Lewis, Trent
Luerssen, Martin
Pfitzner, Darius
Powers, David M. W.
Abrahamyan, Arman
Leung, Yvonne
Gibert, Guillaume
author_sort Stevens, Catherine J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two experiments investigated the effect of features of human behaviour on the quality of interaction with an Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA). METHODS: In Experiment 1, visual prominence cues (head nod, eyebrow raise) of the ECA were manipulated to explore the hypothesis that likeability of an ECA increases as a function of interpersonal mimicry. In the context of an error detection task, the ECA either mimicked or did not mimic a head nod or brow raise that humans produced to give emphasis to a word when correcting the ECA’s vocabulary. In Experiment 2, presence versus absence of facial expressions on comprehension accuracy of two computer-driven ECA monologues was investigated. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, evidence for a positive relationship between ECA mimicry and lifelikeness was obtained. However, a mimicking agent did not elicit more human gestures. In Experiment 2, expressiveness was associated with greater comprehension and higher ratings of humour and engagement. CONCLUSION: Influences from mimicry can be explained by visual and motor simulation, and bidirectional links between similarity and liking. Cue redundancy and minimizing cognitive load are potential explanations for expressiveness aiding comprehension. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40469-016-0008-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5125404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51254042016-12-13 Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content! Stevens, Catherine J. Pinchbeck, Bronwyn Lewis, Trent Luerssen, Martin Pfitzner, Darius Powers, David M. W. Abrahamyan, Arman Leung, Yvonne Gibert, Guillaume Comput Cogn Sci Research BACKGROUND: Two experiments investigated the effect of features of human behaviour on the quality of interaction with an Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA). METHODS: In Experiment 1, visual prominence cues (head nod, eyebrow raise) of the ECA were manipulated to explore the hypothesis that likeability of an ECA increases as a function of interpersonal mimicry. In the context of an error detection task, the ECA either mimicked or did not mimic a head nod or brow raise that humans produced to give emphasis to a word when correcting the ECA’s vocabulary. In Experiment 2, presence versus absence of facial expressions on comprehension accuracy of two computer-driven ECA monologues was investigated. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, evidence for a positive relationship between ECA mimicry and lifelikeness was obtained. However, a mimicking agent did not elicit more human gestures. In Experiment 2, expressiveness was associated with greater comprehension and higher ratings of humour and engagement. CONCLUSION: Influences from mimicry can be explained by visual and motor simulation, and bidirectional links between similarity and liking. Cue redundancy and minimizing cognitive load are potential explanations for expressiveness aiding comprehension. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40469-016-0008-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Singapore 2016-06-10 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5125404/ /pubmed/27980890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40469-016-0008-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Stevens, Catherine J.
Pinchbeck, Bronwyn
Lewis, Trent
Luerssen, Martin
Pfitzner, Darius
Powers, David M. W.
Abrahamyan, Arman
Leung, Yvonne
Gibert, Guillaume
Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!
title Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!
title_full Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!
title_fullStr Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!
title_full_unstemmed Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!
title_short Mimicry and expressiveness of an ECA in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!
title_sort mimicry and expressiveness of an eca in human-agent interaction: familiarity breeds content!
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40469-016-0008-2
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenscatherinej mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent
AT pinchbeckbronwyn mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent
AT lewistrent mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent
AT luerssenmartin mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent
AT pfitznerdarius mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent
AT powersdavidmw mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent
AT abrahamyanarman mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent
AT leungyvonne mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent
AT gibertguillaume mimicryandexpressivenessofanecainhumanagentinteractionfamiliaritybreedscontent