Cargando…

NGO Partnerships in Using Ecotourism for Conservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

We analyse 214 cases worldwide where non-governmental organisations (NGOs) use ecotourism for conservation. Other stakeholders in these initiatives include local communities, the private sector, and government agencies. Stakeholder relationships determine NGO roles and project management structures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romero-Brito, Tania P., Buckley, Ralf C., Byrne, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166919
_version_ 1782469996018925568
author Romero-Brito, Tania P.
Buckley, Ralf C.
Byrne, Jason
author_facet Romero-Brito, Tania P.
Buckley, Ralf C.
Byrne, Jason
author_sort Romero-Brito, Tania P.
collection PubMed
description We analyse 214 cases worldwide where non-governmental organisations (NGOs) use ecotourism for conservation. Other stakeholders in these initiatives include local communities, the private sector, and government agencies. Stakeholder relationships determine NGO roles and project management structures and governance. We classified cases into 10 structural categories based on the initiating stakeholder and the NGO role, and used these categories to analyze geographic patterns and success factors. Most of the 214 cases are community-based (~170; 79%); most are in developing countries (190; 89%); and most are in protected areas (196; 91%). Frequencies of structural categories differ between continents. More cases in Latin America and Asia are initiated by NGOs and local communities, and more in Africa by the private sector. Case-study authors used a range of economic, socio-cultural and environmental criteria to judge whether projects were successful. At global scale, we found no significant association between project success and the involvement of private tourism entrepreneurs. Projects involving either local or international NGOs had higher success rates than those that involved both simultaneously. Future research could adopt political ecology approaches to examine: the factors that lead NGOs to adopt ecotourism enterprises; their internal decision-making processes and strategies; their interactions with the stakeholders involved; and their conservation goals and outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5125656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51256562016-12-15 NGO Partnerships in Using Ecotourism for Conservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Romero-Brito, Tania P. Buckley, Ralf C. Byrne, Jason PLoS One Research Article We analyse 214 cases worldwide where non-governmental organisations (NGOs) use ecotourism for conservation. Other stakeholders in these initiatives include local communities, the private sector, and government agencies. Stakeholder relationships determine NGO roles and project management structures and governance. We classified cases into 10 structural categories based on the initiating stakeholder and the NGO role, and used these categories to analyze geographic patterns and success factors. Most of the 214 cases are community-based (~170; 79%); most are in developing countries (190; 89%); and most are in protected areas (196; 91%). Frequencies of structural categories differ between continents. More cases in Latin America and Asia are initiated by NGOs and local communities, and more in Africa by the private sector. Case-study authors used a range of economic, socio-cultural and environmental criteria to judge whether projects were successful. At global scale, we found no significant association between project success and the involvement of private tourism entrepreneurs. Projects involving either local or international NGOs had higher success rates than those that involved both simultaneously. Future research could adopt political ecology approaches to examine: the factors that lead NGOs to adopt ecotourism enterprises; their internal decision-making processes and strategies; their interactions with the stakeholders involved; and their conservation goals and outcomes. Public Library of Science 2016-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5125656/ /pubmed/27893800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166919 Text en © 2016 Romero-Brito et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Romero-Brito, Tania P.
Buckley, Ralf C.
Byrne, Jason
NGO Partnerships in Using Ecotourism for Conservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title NGO Partnerships in Using Ecotourism for Conservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full NGO Partnerships in Using Ecotourism for Conservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr NGO Partnerships in Using Ecotourism for Conservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed NGO Partnerships in Using Ecotourism for Conservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short NGO Partnerships in Using Ecotourism for Conservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort ngo partnerships in using ecotourism for conservation: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166919
work_keys_str_mv AT romerobritotaniap ngopartnershipsinusingecotourismforconservationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT buckleyralfc ngopartnershipsinusingecotourismforconservationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT byrnejason ngopartnershipsinusingecotourismforconservationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis