Cargando…

The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy

Group size (GS) and space allowance have major implications for the welfare of production species, however their effects are often confounded. In a previous study we investigated the impact of varying space allowance at constant GS. In the present work we report the consequences of varying GS on pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Averós, Xavier, Beltrán de Heredia, Ignacia, Ruiz, Roberto, Estevez, Inma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167061
_version_ 1782469996716228608
author Averós, Xavier
Beltrán de Heredia, Ignacia
Ruiz, Roberto
Estevez, Inma
author_facet Averós, Xavier
Beltrán de Heredia, Ignacia
Ruiz, Roberto
Estevez, Inma
author_sort Averós, Xavier
collection PubMed
description Group size (GS) and space allowance have major implications for the welfare of production species, however their effects are often confounded. In a previous study we investigated the impact of varying space allowance at constant GS. In the present work we report the consequences of varying GS on pregnant ewes while controlling space allowance. We housed ewes at 6 (GS6) or 12 ewes/enclosure (GS12), while controlling space allowance to 1.5 m(2)/ewe (3 enclosures/treatment), and necessarily varying enclosure size. Therefore, when indicating GS effects we implicitly reflect a confounding effect with that of enclosure size. Movement, use of space, behaviour, serum cortisol concentration and body condition score (BCS) were collected during the last 12 gestation weeks. Movement, use of space, and behaviour were collected every other week, during 2 days/week, using 10 minute continuous scan samplings. Blood was collected during weeks 10, 13, 17, and 21 of gestation, and BCS during weeks 15 and 21. Data were analysed using repeated measures, generalized linear mixed models, with GS, week, and their interaction as fixed effects, and enclosure as random effect. GS mainly affected movement and use of space. GS12 ewes walked longer distances using longer steps (P<0.001). An interaction GS by week was observed for angular dispersion (P<0.0001), which was smaller for GS12 from week 10 onwards. Initial restlessness levels were lower for GS12, as shown by the reduced frequency of location changes (P<0.0001). Furthest and mean neighbour distances increased with GS (P<0.0001). The effect of GS on behaviour was only evident for eating behaviour as an interaction with gestation week (P<0.05). Changes in behaviour, movement and use of space along the study indicated an activity peak during weeks 3 to 5. Cortisol changes during gestation (P<0.01) also reflected this activity peak, while BCS (P<0.001) reflected normal physical condition changes during pregnancy. Although the separate effects of GS and enclosure size cannot be disentangled, we conclude that if enough space/ewe is given during gestation, larger GS will result in larger effective space, and no major implications for the welfare of ewes should be expected as GS increases. Ewes will adapt their movement patterns and use of space to enclosure size, and no further behavioural, physiological and physical consequences should be expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5125659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51256592016-12-15 The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy Averós, Xavier Beltrán de Heredia, Ignacia Ruiz, Roberto Estevez, Inma PLoS One Research Article Group size (GS) and space allowance have major implications for the welfare of production species, however their effects are often confounded. In a previous study we investigated the impact of varying space allowance at constant GS. In the present work we report the consequences of varying GS on pregnant ewes while controlling space allowance. We housed ewes at 6 (GS6) or 12 ewes/enclosure (GS12), while controlling space allowance to 1.5 m(2)/ewe (3 enclosures/treatment), and necessarily varying enclosure size. Therefore, when indicating GS effects we implicitly reflect a confounding effect with that of enclosure size. Movement, use of space, behaviour, serum cortisol concentration and body condition score (BCS) were collected during the last 12 gestation weeks. Movement, use of space, and behaviour were collected every other week, during 2 days/week, using 10 minute continuous scan samplings. Blood was collected during weeks 10, 13, 17, and 21 of gestation, and BCS during weeks 15 and 21. Data were analysed using repeated measures, generalized linear mixed models, with GS, week, and their interaction as fixed effects, and enclosure as random effect. GS mainly affected movement and use of space. GS12 ewes walked longer distances using longer steps (P<0.001). An interaction GS by week was observed for angular dispersion (P<0.0001), which was smaller for GS12 from week 10 onwards. Initial restlessness levels were lower for GS12, as shown by the reduced frequency of location changes (P<0.0001). Furthest and mean neighbour distances increased with GS (P<0.0001). The effect of GS on behaviour was only evident for eating behaviour as an interaction with gestation week (P<0.05). Changes in behaviour, movement and use of space along the study indicated an activity peak during weeks 3 to 5. Cortisol changes during gestation (P<0.01) also reflected this activity peak, while BCS (P<0.001) reflected normal physical condition changes during pregnancy. Although the separate effects of GS and enclosure size cannot be disentangled, we conclude that if enough space/ewe is given during gestation, larger GS will result in larger effective space, and no major implications for the welfare of ewes should be expected as GS increases. Ewes will adapt their movement patterns and use of space to enclosure size, and no further behavioural, physiological and physical consequences should be expected. Public Library of Science 2016-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5125659/ /pubmed/27893817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167061 Text en © 2016 Averós et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Averós, Xavier
Beltrán de Heredia, Ignacia
Ruiz, Roberto
Estevez, Inma
The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy
title The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy
title_full The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy
title_fullStr The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy
title_short The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy
title_sort impact of group size on welfare indicators of ewes during pregnancy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167061
work_keys_str_mv AT averosxavier theimpactofgroupsizeonwelfareindicatorsofewesduringpregnancy
AT beltrandeherediaignacia theimpactofgroupsizeonwelfareindicatorsofewesduringpregnancy
AT ruizroberto theimpactofgroupsizeonwelfareindicatorsofewesduringpregnancy
AT estevezinma theimpactofgroupsizeonwelfareindicatorsofewesduringpregnancy
AT averosxavier impactofgroupsizeonwelfareindicatorsofewesduringpregnancy
AT beltrandeherediaignacia impactofgroupsizeonwelfareindicatorsofewesduringpregnancy
AT ruizroberto impactofgroupsizeonwelfareindicatorsofewesduringpregnancy
AT estevezinma impactofgroupsizeonwelfareindicatorsofewesduringpregnancy