Cargando…

Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results

Objective To determine patient perception of residual risk after receiving a negative non-invasive prenatal testing result. Introduction Recent technological advances have yielded a new method of prenatal screening, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which uses cell-free fetal DNA from the mother...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wittman, A. Theresa, Hashmi, S. Shahrukh, Mendez-Figueroa, Hector, Nassef, Salma, Stevens, Blair, Singletary, Claire N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594243
_version_ 1782470025381150720
author Wittman, A. Theresa
Hashmi, S. Shahrukh
Mendez-Figueroa, Hector
Nassef, Salma
Stevens, Blair
Singletary, Claire N.
author_facet Wittman, A. Theresa
Hashmi, S. Shahrukh
Mendez-Figueroa, Hector
Nassef, Salma
Stevens, Blair
Singletary, Claire N.
author_sort Wittman, A. Theresa
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine patient perception of residual risk after receiving a negative non-invasive prenatal testing result. Introduction Recent technological advances have yielded a new method of prenatal screening, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which uses cell-free fetal DNA from the mother's blood to assess for aneuploidy. NIPT has much higher detection rates and positive predictive values than previous methods however, NIPT is not diagnostic. Past studies have demonstrated that patients may underestimate the limitations of prenatal screening; however, patient perception of NIPT has not yet been assessed. Methods and Materials We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess patient understanding of the residual risk for aneuploidy after receiving a negative NIPT result. Ninety-four participants who had prenatal genetic counseling and a subsequent negative NIPT were surveyed. Results There was a significant decline in general level of worry after a negative NIPT result (p = <0.0001). The majority of participants (61%) understood the residual risk post NIPT. Individuals with at least four years of college education were more likely to understand that NIPT does not eliminate the chance of trisomy 13/18 (p = 0.012) and sex chromosome abnormality (p = 0.039), and were more likely to understand which conditions NIPT tests for (p = 0.021), compared to those women with less formal education. Conclusion These data demonstrate that despite the relatively recent implementation of NIPT into obstetric practice, the majority of women are aware of its limitations after receiving genetic counseling. However, clinicians may need to consider alternative ways to communicate the limitations of NIPT to those women with less formal education to ensure understanding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5125929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51259292016-11-29 Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results Wittman, A. Theresa Hashmi, S. Shahrukh Mendez-Figueroa, Hector Nassef, Salma Stevens, Blair Singletary, Claire N. AJP Rep Objective To determine patient perception of residual risk after receiving a negative non-invasive prenatal testing result. Introduction Recent technological advances have yielded a new method of prenatal screening, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which uses cell-free fetal DNA from the mother's blood to assess for aneuploidy. NIPT has much higher detection rates and positive predictive values than previous methods however, NIPT is not diagnostic. Past studies have demonstrated that patients may underestimate the limitations of prenatal screening; however, patient perception of NIPT has not yet been assessed. Methods and Materials We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess patient understanding of the residual risk for aneuploidy after receiving a negative NIPT result. Ninety-four participants who had prenatal genetic counseling and a subsequent negative NIPT were surveyed. Results There was a significant decline in general level of worry after a negative NIPT result (p = <0.0001). The majority of participants (61%) understood the residual risk post NIPT. Individuals with at least four years of college education were more likely to understand that NIPT does not eliminate the chance of trisomy 13/18 (p = 0.012) and sex chromosome abnormality (p = 0.039), and were more likely to understand which conditions NIPT tests for (p = 0.021), compared to those women with less formal education. Conclusion These data demonstrate that despite the relatively recent implementation of NIPT into obstetric practice, the majority of women are aware of its limitations after receiving genetic counseling. However, clinicians may need to consider alternative ways to communicate the limitations of NIPT to those women with less formal education to ensure understanding. Thieme Medical Publishers 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5125929/ /pubmed/27900229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594243 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Wittman, A. Theresa
Hashmi, S. Shahrukh
Mendez-Figueroa, Hector
Nassef, Salma
Stevens, Blair
Singletary, Claire N.
Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results
title Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results
title_full Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results
title_fullStr Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results
title_full_unstemmed Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results
title_short Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results
title_sort patient perception of negative noninvasive prenatal testing results
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5125929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594243
work_keys_str_mv AT wittmanatheresa patientperceptionofnegativenoninvasiveprenataltestingresults
AT hashmisshahrukh patientperceptionofnegativenoninvasiveprenataltestingresults
AT mendezfigueroahector patientperceptionofnegativenoninvasiveprenataltestingresults
AT nassefsalma patientperceptionofnegativenoninvasiveprenataltestingresults
AT stevensblair patientperceptionofnegativenoninvasiveprenataltestingresults
AT singletaryclairen patientperceptionofnegativenoninvasiveprenataltestingresults