Cargando…

Neurofilaments in CSF As Diagnostic Biomarkers in Motor Neuron Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Objective: Neurofilaments in CSF are promising biomarkers which might help in the diagnosis of motor neuron disease (MND). We aim to assess the diagnostic value of neurofilaments in CSF for MND. Methods: Pubmed, Emabase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies systematically. Articles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Dawei, Shen, Dongchao, Tai, Hongfei, Cui, Liying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5126108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00290
_version_ 1782470060028198912
author Li, Dawei
Shen, Dongchao
Tai, Hongfei
Cui, Liying
author_facet Li, Dawei
Shen, Dongchao
Tai, Hongfei
Cui, Liying
author_sort Li, Dawei
collection PubMed
description Objective: Neurofilaments in CSF are promising biomarkers which might help in the diagnosis of motor neuron disease (MND). We aim to assess the diagnostic value of neurofilaments in CSF for MND. Methods: Pubmed, Emabase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies systematically. Articles in English that evaluated the utility of neurofilaments in CSF in the diagnosis of MND were included. Data were extracted by two independent investigators. Diagnostic indexes for neurofilament light chain (NFL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNFH) were calculated separately. Stata 12.0 software with a bivariate mixed-effects model was used to summarize the diagnostic indexes from eligible studies. Results: Five studies on NFL and eight studies on pNFH met inclusion criteria. For NFL, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72–88%) and 85% (95% CI, 76–91%), respectively; the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 5.5 (95% CI, 3.1–9.8) and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.14–0.35), respectively; the summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 25 (95% CI, 9–70), and the area under summary receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87–0.92). For pNFH, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR and NLR were 85% (95% CI, 80–88%), 85% (95% CI, 77–90%), 5.5 (95% CI, 3.6–8.4), and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.13–0.25), respectively; the DOR was 30 (95% CI, 16–58), and the AUC was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93). Conclusion: Neurofilaments in CSF have a high value in the diagnosis of MND, though the optimal cutoff value remains to be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5126108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51261082016-12-13 Neurofilaments in CSF As Diagnostic Biomarkers in Motor Neuron Disease: A Meta-Analysis Li, Dawei Shen, Dongchao Tai, Hongfei Cui, Liying Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: Neurofilaments in CSF are promising biomarkers which might help in the diagnosis of motor neuron disease (MND). We aim to assess the diagnostic value of neurofilaments in CSF for MND. Methods: Pubmed, Emabase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies systematically. Articles in English that evaluated the utility of neurofilaments in CSF in the diagnosis of MND were included. Data were extracted by two independent investigators. Diagnostic indexes for neurofilament light chain (NFL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNFH) were calculated separately. Stata 12.0 software with a bivariate mixed-effects model was used to summarize the diagnostic indexes from eligible studies. Results: Five studies on NFL and eight studies on pNFH met inclusion criteria. For NFL, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72–88%) and 85% (95% CI, 76–91%), respectively; the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 5.5 (95% CI, 3.1–9.8) and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.14–0.35), respectively; the summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 25 (95% CI, 9–70), and the area under summary receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87–0.92). For pNFH, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR and NLR were 85% (95% CI, 80–88%), 85% (95% CI, 77–90%), 5.5 (95% CI, 3.6–8.4), and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.13–0.25), respectively; the DOR was 30 (95% CI, 16–58), and the AUC was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93). Conclusion: Neurofilaments in CSF have a high value in the diagnosis of MND, though the optimal cutoff value remains to be further investigated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5126108/ /pubmed/27965574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00290 Text en Copyright © 2016 Li, Shen, Tai and Cui. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Li, Dawei
Shen, Dongchao
Tai, Hongfei
Cui, Liying
Neurofilaments in CSF As Diagnostic Biomarkers in Motor Neuron Disease: A Meta-Analysis
title Neurofilaments in CSF As Diagnostic Biomarkers in Motor Neuron Disease: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Neurofilaments in CSF As Diagnostic Biomarkers in Motor Neuron Disease: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Neurofilaments in CSF As Diagnostic Biomarkers in Motor Neuron Disease: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Neurofilaments in CSF As Diagnostic Biomarkers in Motor Neuron Disease: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Neurofilaments in CSF As Diagnostic Biomarkers in Motor Neuron Disease: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort neurofilaments in csf as diagnostic biomarkers in motor neuron disease: a meta-analysis
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5126108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00290
work_keys_str_mv AT lidawei neurofilamentsincsfasdiagnosticbiomarkersinmotorneurondiseaseametaanalysis
AT shendongchao neurofilamentsincsfasdiagnosticbiomarkersinmotorneurondiseaseametaanalysis
AT taihongfei neurofilamentsincsfasdiagnosticbiomarkersinmotorneurondiseaseametaanalysis
AT cuiliying neurofilamentsincsfasdiagnosticbiomarkersinmotorneurondiseaseametaanalysis