Cargando…
Reasons for and Against Use of Non-absorbable, Synthetic Mesh During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair, According to the Prolapsed Compartment
Awareness and reporting of mesh-related complications of pelvic organ prolapse repairs have increased in recent years. As a result, deciding whether to use a mesh or not has become a difficult task for urogynecologists. Our aim was to summarize reasons for and against the use of mesh in prolapse rep...
Autores principales: | Kontogiannis, Stavros, Goulimi, Evangelia, Giannitsas, Konstantinos |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5126199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0425-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial
por: Steures, Pieternel, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Mesh–related and intraoperative complications of pelvic organ prolapse repair
por: Kasyan, George, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Vaginal Approaches Using Synthetic Mesh to Treat Pelvic Organ Prolapse
por: Moon, Jei Won, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Mesh-augmented transvaginal repair of recurrent or complex anterior pelvic organ prolapse in accordance with the SCENIHR opinion
por: Naumann, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Prosthetic Meshes for Repair of Hernia and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparison of Biomechanical Properties
por: Maurer, Manfred M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)