Cargando…

Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: The 15-minute work break provides an opportunity to promote health, yet few studies have examined this part of the workday. We studied physical activity and sedentary behavior among office workers and compared the results of the Booster Break program with those of a second intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Wendell C., Paxton, Raheem J., Shegog, Ross, Coan, Sharon P., Dubin, Allison, Page, Timothy F., Rempel, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854422
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160231
_version_ 1782470226025119744
author Taylor, Wendell C.
Paxton, Raheem J.
Shegog, Ross
Coan, Sharon P.
Dubin, Allison
Page, Timothy F.
Rempel, David M.
author_facet Taylor, Wendell C.
Paxton, Raheem J.
Shegog, Ross
Coan, Sharon P.
Dubin, Allison
Page, Timothy F.
Rempel, David M.
author_sort Taylor, Wendell C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The 15-minute work break provides an opportunity to promote health, yet few studies have examined this part of the workday. We studied physical activity and sedentary behavior among office workers and compared the results of the Booster Break program with those of a second intervention and a control group to determine whether the Booster Break program improved physical and behavioral health outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a 3-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial at 4 worksites in Texas from 2010 through 2013 to compare a group-based, structured Booster Break program to an individual-based computer-prompt intervention and a usual-break control group; we analyzed physiologic, behavioral, and employee measures such as work social support, quality of life, and perceived stress. We also identified consistent and inconsistent attendees of the Booster Break sessions. RESULTS: We obtained data from 175 participants (mean age, 43 y; 67% racial/ethnic minority). Compared with the other groups, the consistent Booster Break attendees had greater weekly pedometer counts (P < .001), significant decreases in sedentary behavior and self-reported leisure-time physical activity (P < .001), and a significant increase in triglyceride concentrations (P = .02) (levels remained within the normal range). Usual-break participants significantly increased their body mass index, whereas Booster Break participants maintained body mass index status during the 6 months. Overall, Booster Break participants were 6.8 and 4.3 times more likely to have decreases in BMI and weekend sedentary time, respectively, than usual-break participants. CONCLUSION: Findings varied among the 3 study groups; however, results indicate the potential for consistent attendees of the Booster Break intervention to achieve significant, positive changes related to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and body mass index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5127177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51271772016-12-09 Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial Taylor, Wendell C. Paxton, Raheem J. Shegog, Ross Coan, Sharon P. Dubin, Allison Page, Timothy F. Rempel, David M. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: The 15-minute work break provides an opportunity to promote health, yet few studies have examined this part of the workday. We studied physical activity and sedentary behavior among office workers and compared the results of the Booster Break program with those of a second intervention and a control group to determine whether the Booster Break program improved physical and behavioral health outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a 3-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial at 4 worksites in Texas from 2010 through 2013 to compare a group-based, structured Booster Break program to an individual-based computer-prompt intervention and a usual-break control group; we analyzed physiologic, behavioral, and employee measures such as work social support, quality of life, and perceived stress. We also identified consistent and inconsistent attendees of the Booster Break sessions. RESULTS: We obtained data from 175 participants (mean age, 43 y; 67% racial/ethnic minority). Compared with the other groups, the consistent Booster Break attendees had greater weekly pedometer counts (P < .001), significant decreases in sedentary behavior and self-reported leisure-time physical activity (P < .001), and a significant increase in triglyceride concentrations (P = .02) (levels remained within the normal range). Usual-break participants significantly increased their body mass index, whereas Booster Break participants maintained body mass index status during the 6 months. Overall, Booster Break participants were 6.8 and 4.3 times more likely to have decreases in BMI and weekend sedentary time, respectively, than usual-break participants. CONCLUSION: Findings varied among the 3 study groups; however, results indicate the potential for consistent attendees of the Booster Break intervention to achieve significant, positive changes related to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and body mass index. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5127177/ /pubmed/27854422 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160231 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Taylor, Wendell C.
Paxton, Raheem J.
Shegog, Ross
Coan, Sharon P.
Dubin, Allison
Page, Timothy F.
Rempel, David M.
Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
title Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Impact of Booster Breaks and Computer Prompts on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Desk-Based Workers: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort impact of booster breaks and computer prompts on physical activity and sedentary behavior among desk-based workers: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854422
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160231
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorwendellc impactofboosterbreaksandcomputerpromptsonphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioramongdeskbasedworkersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paxtonraheemj impactofboosterbreaksandcomputerpromptsonphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioramongdeskbasedworkersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shegogross impactofboosterbreaksandcomputerpromptsonphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioramongdeskbasedworkersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coansharonp impactofboosterbreaksandcomputerpromptsonphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioramongdeskbasedworkersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dubinallison impactofboosterbreaksandcomputerpromptsonphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioramongdeskbasedworkersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pagetimothyf impactofboosterbreaksandcomputerpromptsonphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioramongdeskbasedworkersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rempeldavidm impactofboosterbreaksandcomputerpromptsonphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioramongdeskbasedworkersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial