Cargando…

Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options

The disposal of food waste is a large environmental problem. In the United Kingdom (UK), approximately 15 million tonnes of food are wasted each year, mostly disposed of in landfill, via composting, or anaerobic digestion (AD). European Union (EU) guidelines state that food waste should preferential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salemdeeb, Ramy, zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J., Kim, Mi Hyung, Balmford, Andrew, Al-Tabbaa, Abir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.049
_version_ 1782470254081867776
author Salemdeeb, Ramy
zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J.
Kim, Mi Hyung
Balmford, Andrew
Al-Tabbaa, Abir
author_facet Salemdeeb, Ramy
zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J.
Kim, Mi Hyung
Balmford, Andrew
Al-Tabbaa, Abir
author_sort Salemdeeb, Ramy
collection PubMed
description The disposal of food waste is a large environmental problem. In the United Kingdom (UK), approximately 15 million tonnes of food are wasted each year, mostly disposed of in landfill, via composting, or anaerobic digestion (AD). European Union (EU) guidelines state that food waste should preferentially be used as animal feed though for most food waste this practice is currently illegal, because of disease control concerns. Interest in the potential diversion of food waste for animal feed is however growing, with a number of East Asian states offering working examples of safe food waste recycling – based on tight regulation and rendering food waste safe through heat treatment. This study investigates the potential benefits of diverting food waste for pig feed in the UK. A hybrid, consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to compare the environmental and health impacts of four technologies for food waste processing: two technologies of South Korean style-animal feed production (as a wet pig feed and a dry pig feed) were compared with two widespread UK disposal technologies: AD and composting. Results of 14 mid-point impact categories show that the processing of food waste as a wet pig feed and a dry pig feed have the best and second-best scores, respectively, for 13/14 and 12/14 environmental and health impacts. The low impact of food waste feed stems in large part from its substitution of conventional feed, the production of which has substantial environmental and health impacts. While the re-legalisation of the use of food waste as pig feed could offer environmental and public health benefits, this will require support from policy makers, the public, and the pig industry, as well as investment in separated food waste collection which currently occurs in only a minority of regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5127519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51275192017-01-01 Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options Salemdeeb, Ramy zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J. Kim, Mi Hyung Balmford, Andrew Al-Tabbaa, Abir J Clean Prod Article The disposal of food waste is a large environmental problem. In the United Kingdom (UK), approximately 15 million tonnes of food are wasted each year, mostly disposed of in landfill, via composting, or anaerobic digestion (AD). European Union (EU) guidelines state that food waste should preferentially be used as animal feed though for most food waste this practice is currently illegal, because of disease control concerns. Interest in the potential diversion of food waste for animal feed is however growing, with a number of East Asian states offering working examples of safe food waste recycling – based on tight regulation and rendering food waste safe through heat treatment. This study investigates the potential benefits of diverting food waste for pig feed in the UK. A hybrid, consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to compare the environmental and health impacts of four technologies for food waste processing: two technologies of South Korean style-animal feed production (as a wet pig feed and a dry pig feed) were compared with two widespread UK disposal technologies: AD and composting. Results of 14 mid-point impact categories show that the processing of food waste as a wet pig feed and a dry pig feed have the best and second-best scores, respectively, for 13/14 and 12/14 environmental and health impacts. The low impact of food waste feed stems in large part from its substitution of conventional feed, the production of which has substantial environmental and health impacts. While the re-legalisation of the use of food waste as pig feed could offer environmental and public health benefits, this will require support from policy makers, the public, and the pig industry, as well as investment in separated food waste collection which currently occurs in only a minority of regions. Elsevier Science 2017-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5127519/ /pubmed/28050118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.049 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Salemdeeb, Ramy
zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J.
Kim, Mi Hyung
Balmford, Andrew
Al-Tabbaa, Abir
Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options
title Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options
title_full Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options
title_fullStr Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options
title_full_unstemmed Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options
title_short Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options
title_sort environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.049
work_keys_str_mv AT salemdeebramy environmentalandhealthimpactsofusingfoodwasteasanimalfeedacomparativeanalysisoffoodwastemanagementoptions
AT zuermgassenerasmuskhj environmentalandhealthimpactsofusingfoodwasteasanimalfeedacomparativeanalysisoffoodwastemanagementoptions
AT kimmihyung environmentalandhealthimpactsofusingfoodwasteasanimalfeedacomparativeanalysisoffoodwastemanagementoptions
AT balmfordandrew environmentalandhealthimpactsofusingfoodwasteasanimalfeedacomparativeanalysisoffoodwastemanagementoptions
AT altabbaaabir environmentalandhealthimpactsofusingfoodwasteasanimalfeedacomparativeanalysisoffoodwastemanagementoptions