Cargando…

Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To meta-analyze complication rate in computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic lung biopsy and associated risk factors. METHODS: Four databases were searched from 1/2000 to 8/2015 for studies reporting complications in CT-guided lung biopsy. Overall and major complication rates were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heerink, W. J., de Bock, G. H., de Jonge, G. J., Groen, H. J. M., Vliegenthart, R., Oudkerk, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27108299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8
_version_ 1782470300133228544
author Heerink, W. J.
de Bock, G. H.
de Jonge, G. J.
Groen, H. J. M.
Vliegenthart, R.
Oudkerk, M.
author_facet Heerink, W. J.
de Bock, G. H.
de Jonge, G. J.
Groen, H. J. M.
Vliegenthart, R.
Oudkerk, M.
author_sort Heerink, W. J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To meta-analyze complication rate in computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic lung biopsy and associated risk factors. METHODS: Four databases were searched from 1/2000 to 8/2015 for studies reporting complications in CT-guided lung biopsy. Overall and major complication rates were pooled and compared between core biopsy and fine needle aspiration (FNA) using the random-effects model. Risk factors for complications in core biopsy and FNA were identified in meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: For core biopsy, 32 articles (8,133 procedures) were included and for FNA, 17 (4,620 procedures). Pooled overall complication rates for core biopsy and FNA were 38.8 % (95 % CI: 34.3–43.5 %) and 24.0 % (95 % CI: 18.2–30.8 %), respectively. Major complication rates were 5.7 % (95 % CI: 4.4–7.4 %) and 4.4 % (95 % CI: 2.7–7.0 %), respectively. Overall complication rate was higher for core biopsy compared to FNA (p < 0.001). For FNA, larger needle diameter was a risk factor for overall complications, and increased traversed lung parenchyma and smaller lesion size were risk factors for major complications. For core biopsy, no significant risk factors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In CT-guided lung biopsy, minor complications were common and occurred more often in core biopsy than FNA. Major complication rate was low. For FNA, smaller nodule diameter, larger needle diameter and increased traversed lung parenchyma were risk factors for complications. KEY POINTS: • Minor complications are common in CT-guided lung biopsy • Major complication rate is low in CT-guided lung biopsy • CT-guided lung biopsy complications occur more often in core biopsy than FNA • Major complication rate is similar in core biopsy and FNA • Risk factors for FNA are larger needle diameter, smaller lesion size ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5127875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51278752016-12-19 Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis Heerink, W. J. de Bock, G. H. de Jonge, G. J. Groen, H. J. M. Vliegenthart, R. Oudkerk, M. Eur Radiol Interventional OBJECTIVES: To meta-analyze complication rate in computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic lung biopsy and associated risk factors. METHODS: Four databases were searched from 1/2000 to 8/2015 for studies reporting complications in CT-guided lung biopsy. Overall and major complication rates were pooled and compared between core biopsy and fine needle aspiration (FNA) using the random-effects model. Risk factors for complications in core biopsy and FNA were identified in meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: For core biopsy, 32 articles (8,133 procedures) were included and for FNA, 17 (4,620 procedures). Pooled overall complication rates for core biopsy and FNA were 38.8 % (95 % CI: 34.3–43.5 %) and 24.0 % (95 % CI: 18.2–30.8 %), respectively. Major complication rates were 5.7 % (95 % CI: 4.4–7.4 %) and 4.4 % (95 % CI: 2.7–7.0 %), respectively. Overall complication rate was higher for core biopsy compared to FNA (p < 0.001). For FNA, larger needle diameter was a risk factor for overall complications, and increased traversed lung parenchyma and smaller lesion size were risk factors for major complications. For core biopsy, no significant risk factors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In CT-guided lung biopsy, minor complications were common and occurred more often in core biopsy than FNA. Major complication rate was low. For FNA, smaller nodule diameter, larger needle diameter and increased traversed lung parenchyma were risk factors for complications. KEY POINTS: • Minor complications are common in CT-guided lung biopsy • Major complication rate is low in CT-guided lung biopsy • CT-guided lung biopsy complications occur more often in core biopsy than FNA • Major complication rate is similar in core biopsy and FNA • Risk factors for FNA are larger needle diameter, smaller lesion size ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-23 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5127875/ /pubmed/27108299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Interventional
Heerink, W. J.
de Bock, G. H.
de Jonge, G. J.
Groen, H. J. M.
Vliegenthart, R.
Oudkerk, M.
Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis
title Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis
title_full Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis
title_fullStr Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis
title_short Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis
title_sort complication rates of ct-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis
topic Interventional
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27108299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8
work_keys_str_mv AT heerinkwj complicationratesofctguidedtransthoraciclungbiopsymetaanalysis
AT debockgh complicationratesofctguidedtransthoraciclungbiopsymetaanalysis
AT dejongegj complicationratesofctguidedtransthoraciclungbiopsymetaanalysis
AT groenhjm complicationratesofctguidedtransthoraciclungbiopsymetaanalysis
AT vliegenthartr complicationratesofctguidedtransthoraciclungbiopsymetaanalysis
AT oudkerkm complicationratesofctguidedtransthoraciclungbiopsymetaanalysis