Cargando…

Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: The relative cost of biologics in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis, is a key consideration for managed care payers. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to estimate biologic costs and treatment patt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Tao, Shah, Neel, Deshpande, Gaurav, Tang, Derek H., Eisenberg, Debra F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-016-0093-2
_version_ 1782470312311390208
author Gu, Tao
Shah, Neel
Deshpande, Gaurav
Tang, Derek H.
Eisenberg, Debra F.
author_facet Gu, Tao
Shah, Neel
Deshpande, Gaurav
Tang, Derek H.
Eisenberg, Debra F.
author_sort Gu, Tao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relative cost of biologics in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis, is a key consideration for managed care payers. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to estimate biologic costs and treatment patterns in US managed care patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and/or ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: This retrospective study used administrative claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD(SM)) for adults with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and/or ankylosing spondylitis who received abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab between 1 July 2009 and 31 January 2013. Biologic costs (based on drug utilization) and treatment patterns (discontinued, restarted after a >45-day gap, switched to another biologic, or persisted without switching or stopping) were analyzed for the first year post-index. RESULTS: Most of the 24,460 patients received etanercept (48 %), adalimumab (29 %), or infliximab (12 %) as the index biologic. On the index date, 44 % were new to biologic therapy and 56 % were continuing biologic therapy. Biologic cost per treated patient for 1 year was as follows: etanercept $US24,859, adalimumab $US26,537, and infliximab $US26,468. Treatment patterns across indications for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab were as follows: persistent (52, 49, 67 %), restarted (23, 21, 12 %), switched (12, 13, 11 %), and discontinued (14, 18, 10 %). CONCLUSIONS: These findings from a large health benefits organization in the USA are similar to those of several previous cost analyses assessing different populations, which demonstrates the external validity of the results from the previous studies, both over time and across large populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5127933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51279332016-12-19 Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Gu, Tao Shah, Neel Deshpande, Gaurav Tang, Derek H. Eisenberg, Debra F. Drugs Real World Outcomes Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The relative cost of biologics in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis, is a key consideration for managed care payers. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to estimate biologic costs and treatment patterns in US managed care patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and/or ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: This retrospective study used administrative claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD(SM)) for adults with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, and/or ankylosing spondylitis who received abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab between 1 July 2009 and 31 January 2013. Biologic costs (based on drug utilization) and treatment patterns (discontinued, restarted after a >45-day gap, switched to another biologic, or persisted without switching or stopping) were analyzed for the first year post-index. RESULTS: Most of the 24,460 patients received etanercept (48 %), adalimumab (29 %), or infliximab (12 %) as the index biologic. On the index date, 44 % were new to biologic therapy and 56 % were continuing biologic therapy. Biologic cost per treated patient for 1 year was as follows: etanercept $US24,859, adalimumab $US26,537, and infliximab $US26,468. Treatment patterns across indications for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab were as follows: persistent (52, 49, 67 %), restarted (23, 21, 12 %), switched (12, 13, 11 %), and discontinued (14, 18, 10 %). CONCLUSIONS: These findings from a large health benefits organization in the USA are similar to those of several previous cost analyses assessing different populations, which demonstrates the external validity of the results from the previous studies, both over time and across large populations. Springer International Publishing 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5127933/ /pubmed/27757919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-016-0093-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Gu, Tao
Shah, Neel
Deshpande, Gaurav
Tang, Derek H.
Eisenberg, Debra F.
Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparing biologic cost per treated patient across indications among adult us managed care patients: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5127933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-016-0093-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gutao comparingbiologiccostpertreatedpatientacrossindicationsamongadultusmanagedcarepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shahneel comparingbiologiccostpertreatedpatientacrossindicationsamongadultusmanagedcarepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT deshpandegaurav comparingbiologiccostpertreatedpatientacrossindicationsamongadultusmanagedcarepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tangderekh comparingbiologiccostpertreatedpatientacrossindicationsamongadultusmanagedcarepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT eisenbergdebraf comparingbiologiccostpertreatedpatientacrossindicationsamongadultusmanagedcarepatientsaretrospectivecohortstudy