Cargando…

Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics

This study proposed a novel methodology to classify the shape of gaps using landscape indices and multivariate statistics. Patch-level indices were used to collect the qualified shape and spatial configuration characteristics for canopy gaps in the Lienhuachih Experimental Forest in Taiwan in 1998 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Chih-Da, Cheng, Chi-Chuan, Chang, Che-Chang, Lin, Chinsu, Chang, Kun-Cheng, Chuang, Yung-Chung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27901127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38217
_version_ 1782470476246810624
author Wu, Chih-Da
Cheng, Chi-Chuan
Chang, Che-Chang
Lin, Chinsu
Chang, Kun-Cheng
Chuang, Yung-Chung
author_facet Wu, Chih-Da
Cheng, Chi-Chuan
Chang, Che-Chang
Lin, Chinsu
Chang, Kun-Cheng
Chuang, Yung-Chung
author_sort Wu, Chih-Da
collection PubMed
description This study proposed a novel methodology to classify the shape of gaps using landscape indices and multivariate statistics. Patch-level indices were used to collect the qualified shape and spatial configuration characteristics for canopy gaps in the Lienhuachih Experimental Forest in Taiwan in 1998 and 2002. Non-hierarchical cluster analysis was used to assess the optimal number of gap clusters and canonical discriminant analysis was used to generate the discriminant functions for canopy gap classification. The gaps for the two periods were optimally classified into three categories. In general, gap type 1 had a more complex shape, gap type 2 was more elongated and gap type 3 had the largest gaps that were more regular in shape. The results were evaluated using Wilks’ lambda as satisfactory (p < 0.001). The agreement rate of confusion matrices exceeded 96%. Differences in gap characteristics between the classified gap types that were determined using a one-way ANOVA showed a statistical significance in all patch indices (p = 0.00), except for the Euclidean nearest neighbor distance (ENN) in 2002. Taken together, these results demonstrated the feasibility and applicability of the proposed methodology to classify the shape of a gap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5128799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51287992016-12-09 Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics Wu, Chih-Da Cheng, Chi-Chuan Chang, Che-Chang Lin, Chinsu Chang, Kun-Cheng Chuang, Yung-Chung Sci Rep Article This study proposed a novel methodology to classify the shape of gaps using landscape indices and multivariate statistics. Patch-level indices were used to collect the qualified shape and spatial configuration characteristics for canopy gaps in the Lienhuachih Experimental Forest in Taiwan in 1998 and 2002. Non-hierarchical cluster analysis was used to assess the optimal number of gap clusters and canonical discriminant analysis was used to generate the discriminant functions for canopy gap classification. The gaps for the two periods were optimally classified into three categories. In general, gap type 1 had a more complex shape, gap type 2 was more elongated and gap type 3 had the largest gaps that were more regular in shape. The results were evaluated using Wilks’ lambda as satisfactory (p < 0.001). The agreement rate of confusion matrices exceeded 96%. Differences in gap characteristics between the classified gap types that were determined using a one-way ANOVA showed a statistical significance in all patch indices (p = 0.00), except for the Euclidean nearest neighbor distance (ENN) in 2002. Taken together, these results demonstrated the feasibility and applicability of the proposed methodology to classify the shape of a gap. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5128799/ /pubmed/27901127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38217 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Wu, Chih-Da
Cheng, Chi-Chuan
Chang, Che-Chang
Lin, Chinsu
Chang, Kun-Cheng
Chuang, Yung-Chung
Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics
title Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics
title_full Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics
title_fullStr Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics
title_full_unstemmed Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics
title_short Gap Shape Classification using Landscape Indices and Multivariate Statistics
title_sort gap shape classification using landscape indices and multivariate statistics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27901127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38217
work_keys_str_mv AT wuchihda gapshapeclassificationusinglandscapeindicesandmultivariatestatistics
AT chengchichuan gapshapeclassificationusinglandscapeindicesandmultivariatestatistics
AT changchechang gapshapeclassificationusinglandscapeindicesandmultivariatestatistics
AT linchinsu gapshapeclassificationusinglandscapeindicesandmultivariatestatistics
AT changkuncheng gapshapeclassificationusinglandscapeindicesandmultivariatestatistics
AT chuangyungchung gapshapeclassificationusinglandscapeindicesandmultivariatestatistics