Cargando…

Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS) among the general adult German population for prediction of incident type 2 diabetes and detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes. METHODS: The longitudinal sample for prediction of incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes included 3625 perso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paprott, Rebecca, Mühlenbruch, Kristin, Mensink, Gert B M, Thiele, Silke, Schulze, Matthias B, Scheidt-Nave, Christa, Heidemann, Christin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27933187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000280
_version_ 1782470488320114688
author Paprott, Rebecca
Mühlenbruch, Kristin
Mensink, Gert B M
Thiele, Silke
Schulze, Matthias B
Scheidt-Nave, Christa
Heidemann, Christin
author_facet Paprott, Rebecca
Mühlenbruch, Kristin
Mensink, Gert B M
Thiele, Silke
Schulze, Matthias B
Scheidt-Nave, Christa
Heidemann, Christin
author_sort Paprott, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS) among the general adult German population for prediction of incident type 2 diabetes and detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes. METHODS: The longitudinal sample for prediction of incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes included 3625 persons who participated both in the examination survey in 1997–1999 and the examination survey in 2008–2011. Incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes was defined as first-time physician diagnosis or antidiabetic medication during 5 years of follow-up excluding potential incident type 1 and gestational diabetes. The cross-sectional sample for detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes included 6048 participants without diagnosed diabetes of the examination survey in 2008–2011. Prevalent undiagnosed diabetes was defined as glycated haemoglobin ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). We assessed discrimination as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC (95% CI)) and calibration through calibration plots. RESULTS: In longitudinal analyses, 82 subjects with incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes were identified after 5 years of follow-up. For prediction of incident diagnosed diabetes, the GDRS yielded an ROC-AUC of 0.87 (0.83 to 0.90). Calibration plots indicated excellent prediction for low diabetes risk and overestimation for intermediate and high diabetes risk. When considering the entire follow-up period of 11.9 years (ROC-AUC: 0.84 (0.82 to 0.86)) and including incident undiagnosed diabetes (ROC-AUC: 0.81 (0.78 to 0.84)), discrimination decreased somewhat. A previously simplified paper version of the GDRS yielded a similar predictive ability (ROC-AUC: 0.86 (0.82 to 0.89)). In cross-sectional analyses, 128 subjects with undiagnosed diabetes were identified. For detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes, the ROC-AUC was 0.84 (0.81 to 0.86). Again, the simplified version yielded a similar result (ROC-AUC: 0.83 (0.80 to 0.86)). CONCLUSIONS: The GDRS might be applied for public health monitoring of diabetes risk in the German adult population. Future research needs to evaluate whether the GDRS is useful to improve diabetes risk awareness and prevention among the general population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5128853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51288532016-12-08 Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys Paprott, Rebecca Mühlenbruch, Kristin Mensink, Gert B M Thiele, Silke Schulze, Matthias B Scheidt-Nave, Christa Heidemann, Christin BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS) among the general adult German population for prediction of incident type 2 diabetes and detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes. METHODS: The longitudinal sample for prediction of incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes included 3625 persons who participated both in the examination survey in 1997–1999 and the examination survey in 2008–2011. Incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes was defined as first-time physician diagnosis or antidiabetic medication during 5 years of follow-up excluding potential incident type 1 and gestational diabetes. The cross-sectional sample for detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes included 6048 participants without diagnosed diabetes of the examination survey in 2008–2011. Prevalent undiagnosed diabetes was defined as glycated haemoglobin ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). We assessed discrimination as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC (95% CI)) and calibration through calibration plots. RESULTS: In longitudinal analyses, 82 subjects with incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes were identified after 5 years of follow-up. For prediction of incident diagnosed diabetes, the GDRS yielded an ROC-AUC of 0.87 (0.83 to 0.90). Calibration plots indicated excellent prediction for low diabetes risk and overestimation for intermediate and high diabetes risk. When considering the entire follow-up period of 11.9 years (ROC-AUC: 0.84 (0.82 to 0.86)) and including incident undiagnosed diabetes (ROC-AUC: 0.81 (0.78 to 0.84)), discrimination decreased somewhat. A previously simplified paper version of the GDRS yielded a similar predictive ability (ROC-AUC: 0.86 (0.82 to 0.89)). In cross-sectional analyses, 128 subjects with undiagnosed diabetes were identified. For detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes, the ROC-AUC was 0.84 (0.81 to 0.86). Again, the simplified version yielded a similar result (ROC-AUC: 0.83 (0.80 to 0.86)). CONCLUSIONS: The GDRS might be applied for public health monitoring of diabetes risk in the German adult population. Future research needs to evaluate whether the GDRS is useful to improve diabetes risk awareness and prevention among the general population. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5128853/ /pubmed/27933187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000280 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health Services Research
Paprott, Rebecca
Mühlenbruch, Kristin
Mensink, Gert B M
Thiele, Silke
Schulze, Matthias B
Scheidt-Nave, Christa
Heidemann, Christin
Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys
title Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys
title_full Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys
title_fullStr Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys
title_short Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys
title_sort validation of the german diabetes risk score among the general adult population: findings from the german health interview and examination surveys
topic Epidemiology/Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27933187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000280
work_keys_str_mv AT paprottrebecca validationofthegermandiabetesriskscoreamongthegeneraladultpopulationfindingsfromthegermanhealthinterviewandexaminationsurveys
AT muhlenbruchkristin validationofthegermandiabetesriskscoreamongthegeneraladultpopulationfindingsfromthegermanhealthinterviewandexaminationsurveys
AT mensinkgertbm validationofthegermandiabetesriskscoreamongthegeneraladultpopulationfindingsfromthegermanhealthinterviewandexaminationsurveys
AT thielesilke validationofthegermandiabetesriskscoreamongthegeneraladultpopulationfindingsfromthegermanhealthinterviewandexaminationsurveys
AT schulzematthiasb validationofthegermandiabetesriskscoreamongthegeneraladultpopulationfindingsfromthegermanhealthinterviewandexaminationsurveys
AT scheidtnavechrista validationofthegermandiabetesriskscoreamongthegeneraladultpopulationfindingsfromthegermanhealthinterviewandexaminationsurveys
AT heidemannchristin validationofthegermandiabetesriskscoreamongthegeneraladultpopulationfindingsfromthegermanhealthinterviewandexaminationsurveys