Cargando…
Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis
OBJECTIVES: To explore patient, caregiver and physician perceptions and attitudes regarding the balance of benefit and risk in using antibacterial drugs developed through streamlined development processes. DESIGN: Semistructured focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted to elicit perceptio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28186948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013561 |
_version_ | 1782470495142150144 |
---|---|
author | Holland, Thomas L Mikita, Stephen Bloom, Diane Roberts, Jamie McCall, Jonathan Collyar, Deborah Santiago, Jonas Tiernan, Rosemary Toerner, Joseph |
author_facet | Holland, Thomas L Mikita, Stephen Bloom, Diane Roberts, Jamie McCall, Jonathan Collyar, Deborah Santiago, Jonas Tiernan, Rosemary Toerner, Joseph |
author_sort | Holland, Thomas L |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To explore patient, caregiver and physician perceptions and attitudes regarding the balance of benefit and risk in using antibacterial drugs developed through streamlined development processes. DESIGN: Semistructured focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted to elicit perceptions and attitudes about the use of antibacterial drugs to treat multidrug-resistant infections. Participants were given background information about antibiotic resistance, streamlined drug development programmes and FDA drug approval processes. Audio recordings of focus groups/interviews were reviewed and quotes excerpted and categorised to identify key themes. PARTICIPANTS: Two primary stakeholder groups were engaged: one comprising caregivers, healthy persons and patients who had recovered from or were at risk of resistant infection (N=67; 11 focus groups); and one comprising physicians who treat resistant infections (N=23). RESULTS: Responses from focus groups/interviews indicated widespread awareness among patients/caregivers and physicians of the seriousness of the problem of antibacterial resistance. Both groups were willing to accept a degree of uncertainty regarding the balance of risk and benefit in a new therapy where a serious unmet need exists, but also expressed a desire for rigorous monitoring and rapid, transparent reporting of safety/effectiveness data. Both groups wanted to ensure that >1 physician had input on whether to treat patients with antibiotics developed through a streamlined process. Some patients/caregivers unfamiliar with exigencies of critical care suggested a relatively large multidisciplinary team, while physicians believed individual expert consultations would be preferable. Both groups agreed that careful oversight and stewardship of antibacterial drugs are needed to ensure patient safety, preserve efficacy and prevent abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Groups comprising patients/caregivers and physicians were aware of serious issues posed by resistant infections and the lack of effective antibacterial drug therapies and shared a consensus that streamlined development programmes represent a necessary response to the resistance crisis, but one that requires enhanced safeguards and risk communication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5128892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51288922016-12-02 Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis Holland, Thomas L Mikita, Stephen Bloom, Diane Roberts, Jamie McCall, Jonathan Collyar, Deborah Santiago, Jonas Tiernan, Rosemary Toerner, Joseph BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: To explore patient, caregiver and physician perceptions and attitudes regarding the balance of benefit and risk in using antibacterial drugs developed through streamlined development processes. DESIGN: Semistructured focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted to elicit perceptions and attitudes about the use of antibacterial drugs to treat multidrug-resistant infections. Participants were given background information about antibiotic resistance, streamlined drug development programmes and FDA drug approval processes. Audio recordings of focus groups/interviews were reviewed and quotes excerpted and categorised to identify key themes. PARTICIPANTS: Two primary stakeholder groups were engaged: one comprising caregivers, healthy persons and patients who had recovered from or were at risk of resistant infection (N=67; 11 focus groups); and one comprising physicians who treat resistant infections (N=23). RESULTS: Responses from focus groups/interviews indicated widespread awareness among patients/caregivers and physicians of the seriousness of the problem of antibacterial resistance. Both groups were willing to accept a degree of uncertainty regarding the balance of risk and benefit in a new therapy where a serious unmet need exists, but also expressed a desire for rigorous monitoring and rapid, transparent reporting of safety/effectiveness data. Both groups wanted to ensure that >1 physician had input on whether to treat patients with antibiotics developed through a streamlined process. Some patients/caregivers unfamiliar with exigencies of critical care suggested a relatively large multidisciplinary team, while physicians believed individual expert consultations would be preferable. Both groups agreed that careful oversight and stewardship of antibacterial drugs are needed to ensure patient safety, preserve efficacy and prevent abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Groups comprising patients/caregivers and physicians were aware of serious issues posed by resistant infections and the lack of effective antibacterial drug therapies and shared a consensus that streamlined development programmes represent a necessary response to the resistance crisis, but one that requires enhanced safeguards and risk communication. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5128892/ /pubmed/28186948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013561 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Holland, Thomas L Mikita, Stephen Bloom, Diane Roberts, Jamie McCall, Jonathan Collyar, Deborah Santiago, Jonas Tiernan, Rosemary Toerner, Joseph Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis |
title | Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis |
title_full | Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis |
title_fullStr | Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis |
title_short | Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis |
title_sort | patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28186948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollandthomasl patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis AT mikitastephen patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis AT bloomdiane patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis AT robertsjamie patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis AT mccalljonathan patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis AT collyardeborah patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis AT santiagojonas patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis AT tiernanrosemary patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis AT toernerjoseph patientandphysicianattitudesregardingriskandbenefitinstreamlineddevelopmentprogrammesforantibacterialdrugsaqualitativeanalysis |