Cargando…

STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration

Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Cohen, Jérémie F, Korevaar, Daniël A, Altman, Douglas G, Bruns, David E, Gatsonis, Constantine A, Hooft, Lotty, Irwig, Les, Levine, Deborah, Reitsma, Johannes B, de Vet, Henrica C W, Bossuyt, Patrick M M
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28137831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799

Ejemplares similares

Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
por: Korevaar, Daniël A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
por: Bossuyt, Patrick M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies
por: Smidt, Nynke, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports
por: Korevaar, Daniël A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration
por: Altman, Douglas G, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration
por: Altman, Douglas G., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
por: Vandenbroucke, Jan P, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration
por: Sauerbrei, Willi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015
por: Pu, Qiang-Hong, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

PRISMA extension for moxibustion 2020: recommendations, explanation, and elaboration
por: Zhang, Xuan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015
por: Michelessi, Manuele, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
por: Debray, Thomas P A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The standards of reporting trials in pets (PetSORT): Explanation and elaboration
por: Sargeant, Jan M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

STARD 2015 was reproducible in a large set of studies on glaucoma
por: Virgili, Gianni, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
por: Liberati, Alessandro, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration
por: Janssens, A Cecile JW, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration
por: Janssens, A. Cecile J. W., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials: explanation and elaboration
por: McShane, Lisa M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document
por: Pinnock, Hilary, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
por: Percie du Sert, Nathalie, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique: explanation and elaboration
por: Zhang, Kaiping, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
por: Liberati, Alessandro, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Bridging research integrity and global health epidemiology (BRIDGE) guidelines: explanation and elaboration
por: Alba, Sandra, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

CLARIFY 2021: explanation and elaboration of the Delphi-based guidelines for the reporting of yoga research
por: Moonaz, Steffany, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Pathology Abstracts: Compliance with STARD for Abstracts Guidelines
por: McGenity, Clare, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
por: Sounderajah, Viknesh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials
por: Grant, Sean, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Peer Review of “A Machine Learning Explanation of the Pathogen-Immune Relationship of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), and a Model to Predict Immunity and Therapeutic Opportunity: A Comparative Effectiveness Research Study”
por: Abbott, Eric
Publicado: (2020)

Peer Review of “A Machine Learning Explanation of the Pathogen-Immune Relationship of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), and a Model to Predict Immunity and Therapeutic Opportunity: A Comparative Effectiveness Research Study”
por: Chang, Andy
Publicado: (2020)

Fate of manuscripts rejected by a non-English-language general medical journal: a retrospective cohort study
por: Vinther, Siri, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_0ud6d7hk72doj1sg5ejh8miouj