Cargando…

Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report

Functional Electrical Stimulation assisted cycling (FES-Cycling) is increasingly becoming an alternative option recommended to people with spinal cord injury struggling with paraplegia and interested in practicing sports. In order to propose preconditions to guide FES-Cycling recommendation, we aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guimarães, Juliana Araujo, da Fonseca, Lucas Oliveira, dos Santos-Couto-Paz, Clarissa Cardoso, Bó, Antônio Padilha Lanari, Fattal, Charles, Azevedo-Coste, Christine, Fachin-Martins, Emerson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990239
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2016.6085
_version_ 1782470509971111936
author Guimarães, Juliana Araujo
da Fonseca, Lucas Oliveira
dos Santos-Couto-Paz, Clarissa Cardoso
Bó, Antônio Padilha Lanari
Fattal, Charles
Azevedo-Coste, Christine
Fachin-Martins, Emerson
author_facet Guimarães, Juliana Araujo
da Fonseca, Lucas Oliveira
dos Santos-Couto-Paz, Clarissa Cardoso
Bó, Antônio Padilha Lanari
Fattal, Charles
Azevedo-Coste, Christine
Fachin-Martins, Emerson
author_sort Guimarães, Juliana Araujo
collection PubMed
description Functional Electrical Stimulation assisted cycling (FES-Cycling) is increasingly becoming an alternative option recommended to people with spinal cord injury struggling with paraplegia and interested in practicing sports. In order to propose preconditions to guide FES-Cycling recommendation, we aimed to investigate some features and their potential relationships with responsiveness to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES). Fourteen volunteers attended a public recruitment forum to be assessed about their responsiveness through the 16-sessions of NMES. Volunteers were separated in two groups (responsive and non-responsive to NMES) which were investigated in the light of some personal, clinical, structural and functional features. Fifty seven percent of the initial sample responded to electrical stimulation with a visual contraction. This responsive group was predominantly composed by subjects presenting traumatic spinal cord injuries above T12 vertebral level. Only two subjects became responsive at the 3rd and 16th sessions. Among the observed features, the etiology and level of injuries seems to be more associated to responsiveness. Our observations seem to indicate that subjects with traumatic spinal cord injury above T12 level were the best potential candidates for FES-cycling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5128972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51289722016-12-16 Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report Guimarães, Juliana Araujo da Fonseca, Lucas Oliveira dos Santos-Couto-Paz, Clarissa Cardoso Bó, Antônio Padilha Lanari Fattal, Charles Azevedo-Coste, Christine Fachin-Martins, Emerson Eur J Transl Myol 2016 IFESS Conference Functional Electrical Stimulation assisted cycling (FES-Cycling) is increasingly becoming an alternative option recommended to people with spinal cord injury struggling with paraplegia and interested in practicing sports. In order to propose preconditions to guide FES-Cycling recommendation, we aimed to investigate some features and their potential relationships with responsiveness to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES). Fourteen volunteers attended a public recruitment forum to be assessed about their responsiveness through the 16-sessions of NMES. Volunteers were separated in two groups (responsive and non-responsive to NMES) which were investigated in the light of some personal, clinical, structural and functional features. Fifty seven percent of the initial sample responded to electrical stimulation with a visual contraction. This responsive group was predominantly composed by subjects presenting traumatic spinal cord injuries above T12 vertebral level. Only two subjects became responsive at the 3rd and 16th sessions. Among the observed features, the etiology and level of injuries seems to be more associated to responsiveness. Our observations seem to indicate that subjects with traumatic spinal cord injury above T12 level were the best potential candidates for FES-cycling. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5128972/ /pubmed/27990239 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2016.6085 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle 2016 IFESS Conference
Guimarães, Juliana Araujo
da Fonseca, Lucas Oliveira
dos Santos-Couto-Paz, Clarissa Cardoso
Bó, Antônio Padilha Lanari
Fattal, Charles
Azevedo-Coste, Christine
Fachin-Martins, Emerson
Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report
title Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report
title_full Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report
title_fullStr Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report
title_full_unstemmed Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report
title_short Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report
title_sort towards parameters and protocols to recommend fes-cycling in cases of paraplegia: a preliminary report
topic 2016 IFESS Conference
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990239
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2016.6085
work_keys_str_mv AT guimaraesjulianaaraujo towardsparametersandprotocolstorecommendfescyclingincasesofparaplegiaapreliminaryreport
AT dafonsecalucasoliveira towardsparametersandprotocolstorecommendfescyclingincasesofparaplegiaapreliminaryreport
AT dossantoscoutopazclarissacardoso towardsparametersandprotocolstorecommendfescyclingincasesofparaplegiaapreliminaryreport
AT boantoniopadilhalanari towardsparametersandprotocolstorecommendfescyclingincasesofparaplegiaapreliminaryreport
AT fattalcharles towardsparametersandprotocolstorecommendfescyclingincasesofparaplegiaapreliminaryreport
AT azevedocostechristine towardsparametersandprotocolstorecommendfescyclingincasesofparaplegiaapreliminaryreport
AT fachinmartinsemerson towardsparametersandprotocolstorecommendfescyclingincasesofparaplegiaapreliminaryreport