Cargando…

Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Peer facilitators play an important role in determining the success of many support groups for patients with medical illnesses. However, many facilitators do not receive training for their role and report a number of challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities. The objective of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delisle, Vanessa C, Gumuchian, Stephanie T, Kloda, Lorie A, Boruff, Jill, El-Baalbaki, Ghassan, Körner, Annett, Malcarne, Vanessa L, Thombs, Brett D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325
_version_ 1782470512450994176
author Delisle, Vanessa C
Gumuchian, Stephanie T
Kloda, Lorie A
Boruff, Jill
El-Baalbaki, Ghassan
Körner, Annett
Malcarne, Vanessa L
Thombs, Brett D
author_facet Delisle, Vanessa C
Gumuchian, Stephanie T
Kloda, Lorie A
Boruff, Jill
El-Baalbaki, Ghassan
Körner, Annett
Malcarne, Vanessa L
Thombs, Brett D
author_sort Delisle, Vanessa C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Peer facilitators play an important role in determining the success of many support groups for patients with medical illnesses. However, many facilitators do not receive training for their role and report a number of challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of training and support programmes for peer facilitators of support groups for people with medical illnesses on (1) the competency and self-efficacy of group facilitators and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with support groups among group members. METHODS: Searches included the CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from inception through 8 April 2016; reference list reviews; citation tracking of included articles; and trial registry reviews. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language that evaluated the effects of training programmes for peer facilitators compared with no training or alternative training formats on (1) competency or self-efficacy of peer facilitators, and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with groups of group members. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: There were 9757 unique titles/abstracts and 2 full-text publications reviewed. 1 RCT met inclusion criteria. The study evaluated the confidence and self-efficacy of cancer support group facilitators randomised to 4 months access to a website and discussion forum (N=23; low resource) versus website, discussion forum and 2-day training workshop (N=29). There were no significant differences in facilitator confidence (Hedges' g=0.16, 95% CI −0.39 to 0.71) or self-efficacy (Hedges' g=0.31, 95% CI −0.24 to 0.86). Risk of bias was unclear or high for 4 of 6 domains. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed and well-conducted, adequately powered trials of peer support group facilitator training programmes for patients with medical illnesses are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014013601.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5128989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51289892016-12-02 Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review Delisle, Vanessa C Gumuchian, Stephanie T Kloda, Lorie A Boruff, Jill El-Baalbaki, Ghassan Körner, Annett Malcarne, Vanessa L Thombs, Brett D BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: Peer facilitators play an important role in determining the success of many support groups for patients with medical illnesses. However, many facilitators do not receive training for their role and report a number of challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of training and support programmes for peer facilitators of support groups for people with medical illnesses on (1) the competency and self-efficacy of group facilitators and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with support groups among group members. METHODS: Searches included the CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from inception through 8 April 2016; reference list reviews; citation tracking of included articles; and trial registry reviews. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language that evaluated the effects of training programmes for peer facilitators compared with no training or alternative training formats on (1) competency or self-efficacy of peer facilitators, and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with groups of group members. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: There were 9757 unique titles/abstracts and 2 full-text publications reviewed. 1 RCT met inclusion criteria. The study evaluated the confidence and self-efficacy of cancer support group facilitators randomised to 4 months access to a website and discussion forum (N=23; low resource) versus website, discussion forum and 2-day training workshop (N=29). There were no significant differences in facilitator confidence (Hedges' g=0.16, 95% CI −0.39 to 0.71) or self-efficacy (Hedges' g=0.31, 95% CI −0.24 to 0.86). Risk of bias was unclear or high for 4 of 6 domains. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed and well-conducted, adequately powered trials of peer support group facilitator training programmes for patients with medical illnesses are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014013601. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5128989/ /pubmed/27856483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Delisle, Vanessa C
Gumuchian, Stephanie T
Kloda, Lorie A
Boruff, Jill
El-Baalbaki, Ghassan
Körner, Annett
Malcarne, Vanessa L
Thombs, Brett D
Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review
title Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review
title_full Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review
title_short Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review
title_sort effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325
work_keys_str_mv AT delislevanessac effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview
AT gumuchianstephaniet effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview
AT klodaloriea effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview
AT boruffjill effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview
AT elbaalbakighassan effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview
AT kornerannett effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview
AT malcarnevanessal effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview
AT thombsbrettd effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview