Cargando…
Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Peer facilitators play an important role in determining the success of many support groups for patients with medical illnesses. However, many facilitators do not receive training for their role and report a number of challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities. The objective of this s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325 |
_version_ | 1782470512450994176 |
---|---|
author | Delisle, Vanessa C Gumuchian, Stephanie T Kloda, Lorie A Boruff, Jill El-Baalbaki, Ghassan Körner, Annett Malcarne, Vanessa L Thombs, Brett D |
author_facet | Delisle, Vanessa C Gumuchian, Stephanie T Kloda, Lorie A Boruff, Jill El-Baalbaki, Ghassan Körner, Annett Malcarne, Vanessa L Thombs, Brett D |
author_sort | Delisle, Vanessa C |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Peer facilitators play an important role in determining the success of many support groups for patients with medical illnesses. However, many facilitators do not receive training for their role and report a number of challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of training and support programmes for peer facilitators of support groups for people with medical illnesses on (1) the competency and self-efficacy of group facilitators and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with support groups among group members. METHODS: Searches included the CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from inception through 8 April 2016; reference list reviews; citation tracking of included articles; and trial registry reviews. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language that evaluated the effects of training programmes for peer facilitators compared with no training or alternative training formats on (1) competency or self-efficacy of peer facilitators, and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with groups of group members. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: There were 9757 unique titles/abstracts and 2 full-text publications reviewed. 1 RCT met inclusion criteria. The study evaluated the confidence and self-efficacy of cancer support group facilitators randomised to 4 months access to a website and discussion forum (N=23; low resource) versus website, discussion forum and 2-day training workshop (N=29). There were no significant differences in facilitator confidence (Hedges' g=0.16, 95% CI −0.39 to 0.71) or self-efficacy (Hedges' g=0.31, 95% CI −0.24 to 0.86). Risk of bias was unclear or high for 4 of 6 domains. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed and well-conducted, adequately powered trials of peer support group facilitator training programmes for patients with medical illnesses are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014013601. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5128989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51289892016-12-02 Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review Delisle, Vanessa C Gumuchian, Stephanie T Kloda, Lorie A Boruff, Jill El-Baalbaki, Ghassan Körner, Annett Malcarne, Vanessa L Thombs, Brett D BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: Peer facilitators play an important role in determining the success of many support groups for patients with medical illnesses. However, many facilitators do not receive training for their role and report a number of challenges in fulfilling their responsibilities. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of training and support programmes for peer facilitators of support groups for people with medical illnesses on (1) the competency and self-efficacy of group facilitators and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with support groups among group members. METHODS: Searches included the CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from inception through 8 April 2016; reference list reviews; citation tracking of included articles; and trial registry reviews. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language that evaluated the effects of training programmes for peer facilitators compared with no training or alternative training formats on (1) competency or self-efficacy of peer facilitators, and (2) self-efficacy for disease management, health outcomes and satisfaction with groups of group members. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: There were 9757 unique titles/abstracts and 2 full-text publications reviewed. 1 RCT met inclusion criteria. The study evaluated the confidence and self-efficacy of cancer support group facilitators randomised to 4 months access to a website and discussion forum (N=23; low resource) versus website, discussion forum and 2-day training workshop (N=29). There were no significant differences in facilitator confidence (Hedges' g=0.16, 95% CI −0.39 to 0.71) or self-efficacy (Hedges' g=0.31, 95% CI −0.24 to 0.86). Risk of bias was unclear or high for 4 of 6 domains. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed and well-conducted, adequately powered trials of peer support group facilitator training programmes for patients with medical illnesses are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014013601. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5128989/ /pubmed/27856483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Delisle, Vanessa C Gumuchian, Stephanie T Kloda, Lorie A Boruff, Jill El-Baalbaki, Ghassan Körner, Annett Malcarne, Vanessa L Thombs, Brett D Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review |
title | Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review |
title_full | Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review |
title_short | Effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review |
title_sort | effect of support group peer facilitator training programmes on peer facilitator and support group member outcomes: a systematic review |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delislevanessac effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview AT gumuchianstephaniet effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview AT klodaloriea effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview AT boruffjill effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview AT elbaalbakighassan effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview AT kornerannett effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview AT malcarnevanessal effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview AT thombsbrettd effectofsupportgrouppeerfacilitatortrainingprogrammesonpeerfacilitatorandsupportgroupmemberoutcomesasystematicreview |