Cargando…

Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST)

INTRODUCTION: Errors in trauma resuscitation are common and have been attributed to breakdowns in the coordination of system elements (eg, tools/technology, physical environment and layout, individual skills/knowledge, team interaction). These breakdowns are triggered by unique circumstances and may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Mark, Petrosoniak, Andrew, Pinkney, Sonia, Hicks, Christopher, White, Kari, Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva, Campbell, Douglas, McGowan, Melissa, Gray, Alice, Trbovich, Patricia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013683
_version_ 1782470513834065920
author Fan, Mark
Petrosoniak, Andrew
Pinkney, Sonia
Hicks, Christopher
White, Kari
Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva
Campbell, Douglas
McGowan, Melissa
Gray, Alice
Trbovich, Patricia
author_facet Fan, Mark
Petrosoniak, Andrew
Pinkney, Sonia
Hicks, Christopher
White, Kari
Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva
Campbell, Douglas
McGowan, Melissa
Gray, Alice
Trbovich, Patricia
author_sort Fan, Mark
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Errors in trauma resuscitation are common and have been attributed to breakdowns in the coordination of system elements (eg, tools/technology, physical environment and layout, individual skills/knowledge, team interaction). These breakdowns are triggered by unique circumstances and may go unrecognised by trauma team members or hospital administrators; they can be described as latent safety threats (LSTs). Retrospective approaches to identifying LSTs (ie, after they occur) are likely to be incomplete and prone to bias. To date, prospective studies have not used video review as the primary mechanism to identify any and all LSTs in trauma resuscitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A series of 12 unannounced in situ simulations (ISS) will be conducted to prospectively identify LSTs at a level 1 Canadian trauma centre (over 800 dedicated trauma team activations annually). 4 scenarios have already been designed as part of this protocol based on 5 recurring themes found in the hospital's mortality and morbidity process. The actual trauma team will be activated to participate in the study. Each simulation will be audio/video recorded from 4 different camera angles and transcribed to conduct a framework analysis. Video reviewers will code the videos deductively based on a priori themes of LSTs identified from the literature, and/or inductively based on the events occurring in the simulation. LSTs will be prioritised to target interventions in future work. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional research ethics approval has been acquired (SMH REB #15-046). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. Findings will also be presented to key institutional stakeholders to inform mitigation strategies for improved patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5128995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51289952016-12-02 Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST) Fan, Mark Petrosoniak, Andrew Pinkney, Sonia Hicks, Christopher White, Kari Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva Campbell, Douglas McGowan, Melissa Gray, Alice Trbovich, Patricia BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Errors in trauma resuscitation are common and have been attributed to breakdowns in the coordination of system elements (eg, tools/technology, physical environment and layout, individual skills/knowledge, team interaction). These breakdowns are triggered by unique circumstances and may go unrecognised by trauma team members or hospital administrators; they can be described as latent safety threats (LSTs). Retrospective approaches to identifying LSTs (ie, after they occur) are likely to be incomplete and prone to bias. To date, prospective studies have not used video review as the primary mechanism to identify any and all LSTs in trauma resuscitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A series of 12 unannounced in situ simulations (ISS) will be conducted to prospectively identify LSTs at a level 1 Canadian trauma centre (over 800 dedicated trauma team activations annually). 4 scenarios have already been designed as part of this protocol based on 5 recurring themes found in the hospital's mortality and morbidity process. The actual trauma team will be activated to participate in the study. Each simulation will be audio/video recorded from 4 different camera angles and transcribed to conduct a framework analysis. Video reviewers will code the videos deductively based on a priori themes of LSTs identified from the literature, and/or inductively based on the events occurring in the simulation. LSTs will be prioritised to target interventions in future work. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional research ethics approval has been acquired (SMH REB #15-046). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. Findings will also be presented to key institutional stakeholders to inform mitigation strategies for improved patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5128995/ /pubmed/27821600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013683 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Fan, Mark
Petrosoniak, Andrew
Pinkney, Sonia
Hicks, Christopher
White, Kari
Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva
Campbell, Douglas
McGowan, Melissa
Gray, Alice
Trbovich, Patricia
Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST)
title Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST)
title_full Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST)
title_fullStr Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST)
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST)
title_short Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST)
title_sort study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (trust)
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013683
work_keys_str_mv AT fanmark studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT petrosoniakandrew studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT pinkneysonia studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT hickschristopher studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT whitekari studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT almeidaanapaulasiquierasilva studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT campbelldouglas studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT mcgowanmelissa studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT grayalice studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust
AT trbovichpatricia studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust