Cargando…
Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST)
INTRODUCTION: Errors in trauma resuscitation are common and have been attributed to breakdowns in the coordination of system elements (eg, tools/technology, physical environment and layout, individual skills/knowledge, team interaction). These breakdowns are triggered by unique circumstances and may...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013683 |
_version_ | 1782470513834065920 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Mark Petrosoniak, Andrew Pinkney, Sonia Hicks, Christopher White, Kari Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva Campbell, Douglas McGowan, Melissa Gray, Alice Trbovich, Patricia |
author_facet | Fan, Mark Petrosoniak, Andrew Pinkney, Sonia Hicks, Christopher White, Kari Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva Campbell, Douglas McGowan, Melissa Gray, Alice Trbovich, Patricia |
author_sort | Fan, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Errors in trauma resuscitation are common and have been attributed to breakdowns in the coordination of system elements (eg, tools/technology, physical environment and layout, individual skills/knowledge, team interaction). These breakdowns are triggered by unique circumstances and may go unrecognised by trauma team members or hospital administrators; they can be described as latent safety threats (LSTs). Retrospective approaches to identifying LSTs (ie, after they occur) are likely to be incomplete and prone to bias. To date, prospective studies have not used video review as the primary mechanism to identify any and all LSTs in trauma resuscitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A series of 12 unannounced in situ simulations (ISS) will be conducted to prospectively identify LSTs at a level 1 Canadian trauma centre (over 800 dedicated trauma team activations annually). 4 scenarios have already been designed as part of this protocol based on 5 recurring themes found in the hospital's mortality and morbidity process. The actual trauma team will be activated to participate in the study. Each simulation will be audio/video recorded from 4 different camera angles and transcribed to conduct a framework analysis. Video reviewers will code the videos deductively based on a priori themes of LSTs identified from the literature, and/or inductively based on the events occurring in the simulation. LSTs will be prioritised to target interventions in future work. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional research ethics approval has been acquired (SMH REB #15-046). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. Findings will also be presented to key institutional stakeholders to inform mitigation strategies for improved patient safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5128995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51289952016-12-02 Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST) Fan, Mark Petrosoniak, Andrew Pinkney, Sonia Hicks, Christopher White, Kari Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva Campbell, Douglas McGowan, Melissa Gray, Alice Trbovich, Patricia BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Errors in trauma resuscitation are common and have been attributed to breakdowns in the coordination of system elements (eg, tools/technology, physical environment and layout, individual skills/knowledge, team interaction). These breakdowns are triggered by unique circumstances and may go unrecognised by trauma team members or hospital administrators; they can be described as latent safety threats (LSTs). Retrospective approaches to identifying LSTs (ie, after they occur) are likely to be incomplete and prone to bias. To date, prospective studies have not used video review as the primary mechanism to identify any and all LSTs in trauma resuscitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A series of 12 unannounced in situ simulations (ISS) will be conducted to prospectively identify LSTs at a level 1 Canadian trauma centre (over 800 dedicated trauma team activations annually). 4 scenarios have already been designed as part of this protocol based on 5 recurring themes found in the hospital's mortality and morbidity process. The actual trauma team will be activated to participate in the study. Each simulation will be audio/video recorded from 4 different camera angles and transcribed to conduct a framework analysis. Video reviewers will code the videos deductively based on a priori themes of LSTs identified from the literature, and/or inductively based on the events occurring in the simulation. LSTs will be prioritised to target interventions in future work. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional research ethics approval has been acquired (SMH REB #15-046). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. Findings will also be presented to key institutional stakeholders to inform mitigation strategies for improved patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5128995/ /pubmed/27821600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013683 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Fan, Mark Petrosoniak, Andrew Pinkney, Sonia Hicks, Christopher White, Kari Almeida, Ana Paula Siquiera Silva Campbell, Douglas McGowan, Melissa Gray, Alice Trbovich, Patricia Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST) |
title | Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST) |
title_full | Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST) |
title_fullStr | Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST) |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST) |
title_short | Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST) |
title_sort | study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (trust) |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5128995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanmark studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT petrosoniakandrew studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT pinkneysonia studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT hickschristopher studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT whitekari studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT almeidaanapaulasiquierasilva studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT campbelldouglas studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT mcgowanmelissa studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT grayalice studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust AT trbovichpatricia studyprotocolforaframeworkanalysisusingvideoreviewtoidentifylatentsafetythreatstraumaresuscitationusinginsitusimulationteamtrainingtrust |