Cargando…
Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care
OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of ‘leave on’ emollients for children with eczema. DESIGN: Single-centre, pragmatic, 4-arm, observer-blinded, parallel, randomised feasibility trial. SETTING: General practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Children with eczema age...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012021 |
_version_ | 1782470533772738560 |
---|---|
author | Ridd, Matthew J Garfield, Kirsty Gaunt, Daisy M Hollinghurst, Sandra Redmond, Niamh M Powell, Kingsley Wilson, Victoria Guy, Richard H Ball, Nicola Shaw, Lindsay Purdy, Sarah Metcalfe, Chris |
author_facet | Ridd, Matthew J Garfield, Kirsty Gaunt, Daisy M Hollinghurst, Sandra Redmond, Niamh M Powell, Kingsley Wilson, Victoria Guy, Richard H Ball, Nicola Shaw, Lindsay Purdy, Sarah Metcalfe, Chris |
author_sort | Ridd, Matthew J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of ‘leave on’ emollients for children with eczema. DESIGN: Single-centre, pragmatic, 4-arm, observer-blinded, parallel, randomised feasibility trial. SETTING: General practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Children with eczema aged 1 month to <5 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome—proportion of parents who reported use of the allocated study emollient every day for the duration of follow-up (12 weeks). Other feasibility outcomes—participant recruitment and retention, data collection and completeness and blinding of observers to allocation. INTERVENTIONS: Aveeno lotion, Diprobase cream, Doublebase gel, Hydromol ointment. RESULTS: 197 children were recruited—107 by self-referral (mainly via practice mail-outs) and 90 by inconsultation (clinician consenting and randomising) pathways. Participants recruited inconsultation were younger, had more severe Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores and were more likely to withdraw than self-referrals. Parents of 20 (10%) of all the randomised participants reported using the allocated emollient daily for 84 days. The use of other non-study emollients was common. Completeness of data collected by parent-held daily diaries and at monthly study visits was good. Daily diaries were liked (81%) but mainly completed on paper rather than via electronic (‘app’) form. Major costs drivers were general practitioner consultations and eczema-related prescriptions. Observer unblinding was infrequent, and occurred at the baseline or first follow-up visit through accidental disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible in a primary care setting to recruit and randomise young children with eczema to emollients, follow them up and collect relevant trial data, while keeping observers blinded to their allocation. However, reported use of emollients (study and others) has design implications for future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN21828118/EudraCT2013-003001-26. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5129109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51291092016-12-02 Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care Ridd, Matthew J Garfield, Kirsty Gaunt, Daisy M Hollinghurst, Sandra Redmond, Niamh M Powell, Kingsley Wilson, Victoria Guy, Richard H Ball, Nicola Shaw, Lindsay Purdy, Sarah Metcalfe, Chris BMJ Open Dermatology OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of ‘leave on’ emollients for children with eczema. DESIGN: Single-centre, pragmatic, 4-arm, observer-blinded, parallel, randomised feasibility trial. SETTING: General practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Children with eczema aged 1 month to <5 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome—proportion of parents who reported use of the allocated study emollient every day for the duration of follow-up (12 weeks). Other feasibility outcomes—participant recruitment and retention, data collection and completeness and blinding of observers to allocation. INTERVENTIONS: Aveeno lotion, Diprobase cream, Doublebase gel, Hydromol ointment. RESULTS: 197 children were recruited—107 by self-referral (mainly via practice mail-outs) and 90 by inconsultation (clinician consenting and randomising) pathways. Participants recruited inconsultation were younger, had more severe Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores and were more likely to withdraw than self-referrals. Parents of 20 (10%) of all the randomised participants reported using the allocated emollient daily for 84 days. The use of other non-study emollients was common. Completeness of data collected by parent-held daily diaries and at monthly study visits was good. Daily diaries were liked (81%) but mainly completed on paper rather than via electronic (‘app’) form. Major costs drivers were general practitioner consultations and eczema-related prescriptions. Observer unblinding was infrequent, and occurred at the baseline or first follow-up visit through accidental disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible in a primary care setting to recruit and randomise young children with eczema to emollients, follow them up and collect relevant trial data, while keeping observers blinded to their allocation. However, reported use of emollients (study and others) has design implications for future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN21828118/EudraCT2013-003001-26. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5129109/ /pubmed/27852708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012021 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Dermatology Ridd, Matthew J Garfield, Kirsty Gaunt, Daisy M Hollinghurst, Sandra Redmond, Niamh M Powell, Kingsley Wilson, Victoria Guy, Richard H Ball, Nicola Shaw, Lindsay Purdy, Sarah Metcalfe, Chris Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care |
title | Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care |
title_full | Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care |
title_fullStr | Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care |
title_short | Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care |
title_sort | choice of moisturiser for eczema treatment (comet): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care |
topic | Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riddmatthewj choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT garfieldkirsty choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT gauntdaisym choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT hollinghurstsandra choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT redmondniamhm choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT powellkingsley choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT wilsonvictoria choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT guyrichardh choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT ballnicola choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT shawlindsay choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT purdysarah choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare AT metcalfechris choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare |