Cargando…

Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of ‘leave on’ emollients for children with eczema. DESIGN: Single-centre, pragmatic, 4-arm, observer-blinded, parallel, randomised feasibility trial. SETTING: General practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Children with eczema age...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridd, Matthew J, Garfield, Kirsty, Gaunt, Daisy M, Hollinghurst, Sandra, Redmond, Niamh M, Powell, Kingsley, Wilson, Victoria, Guy, Richard H, Ball, Nicola, Shaw, Lindsay, Purdy, Sarah, Metcalfe, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012021
_version_ 1782470533772738560
author Ridd, Matthew J
Garfield, Kirsty
Gaunt, Daisy M
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Redmond, Niamh M
Powell, Kingsley
Wilson, Victoria
Guy, Richard H
Ball, Nicola
Shaw, Lindsay
Purdy, Sarah
Metcalfe, Chris
author_facet Ridd, Matthew J
Garfield, Kirsty
Gaunt, Daisy M
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Redmond, Niamh M
Powell, Kingsley
Wilson, Victoria
Guy, Richard H
Ball, Nicola
Shaw, Lindsay
Purdy, Sarah
Metcalfe, Chris
author_sort Ridd, Matthew J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of ‘leave on’ emollients for children with eczema. DESIGN: Single-centre, pragmatic, 4-arm, observer-blinded, parallel, randomised feasibility trial. SETTING: General practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Children with eczema aged 1 month to <5 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome—proportion of parents who reported use of the allocated study emollient every day for the duration of follow-up (12 weeks). Other feasibility outcomes—participant recruitment and retention, data collection and completeness and blinding of observers to allocation. INTERVENTIONS: Aveeno lotion, Diprobase cream, Doublebase gel, Hydromol ointment. RESULTS: 197 children were recruited—107 by self-referral (mainly via practice mail-outs) and 90 by inconsultation (clinician consenting and randomising) pathways. Participants recruited inconsultation were younger, had more severe Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores and were more likely to withdraw than self-referrals. Parents of 20 (10%) of all the randomised participants reported using the allocated emollient daily for 84 days. The use of other non-study emollients was common. Completeness of data collected by parent-held daily diaries and at monthly study visits was good. Daily diaries were liked (81%) but mainly completed on paper rather than via electronic (‘app’) form. Major costs drivers were general practitioner consultations and eczema-related prescriptions. Observer unblinding was infrequent, and occurred at the baseline or first follow-up visit through accidental disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible in a primary care setting to recruit and randomise young children with eczema to emollients, follow them up and collect relevant trial data, while keeping observers blinded to their allocation. However, reported use of emollients (study and others) has design implications for future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN21828118/EudraCT2013-003001-26.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5129109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51291092016-12-02 Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care Ridd, Matthew J Garfield, Kirsty Gaunt, Daisy M Hollinghurst, Sandra Redmond, Niamh M Powell, Kingsley Wilson, Victoria Guy, Richard H Ball, Nicola Shaw, Lindsay Purdy, Sarah Metcalfe, Chris BMJ Open Dermatology OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of ‘leave on’ emollients for children with eczema. DESIGN: Single-centre, pragmatic, 4-arm, observer-blinded, parallel, randomised feasibility trial. SETTING: General practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Children with eczema aged 1 month to <5 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome—proportion of parents who reported use of the allocated study emollient every day for the duration of follow-up (12 weeks). Other feasibility outcomes—participant recruitment and retention, data collection and completeness and blinding of observers to allocation. INTERVENTIONS: Aveeno lotion, Diprobase cream, Doublebase gel, Hydromol ointment. RESULTS: 197 children were recruited—107 by self-referral (mainly via practice mail-outs) and 90 by inconsultation (clinician consenting and randomising) pathways. Participants recruited inconsultation were younger, had more severe Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores and were more likely to withdraw than self-referrals. Parents of 20 (10%) of all the randomised participants reported using the allocated emollient daily for 84 days. The use of other non-study emollients was common. Completeness of data collected by parent-held daily diaries and at monthly study visits was good. Daily diaries were liked (81%) but mainly completed on paper rather than via electronic (‘app’) form. Major costs drivers were general practitioner consultations and eczema-related prescriptions. Observer unblinding was infrequent, and occurred at the baseline or first follow-up visit through accidental disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible in a primary care setting to recruit and randomise young children with eczema to emollients, follow them up and collect relevant trial data, while keeping observers blinded to their allocation. However, reported use of emollients (study and others) has design implications for future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN21828118/EudraCT2013-003001-26. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5129109/ /pubmed/27852708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012021 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Dermatology
Ridd, Matthew J
Garfield, Kirsty
Gaunt, Daisy M
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Redmond, Niamh M
Powell, Kingsley
Wilson, Victoria
Guy, Richard H
Ball, Nicola
Shaw, Lindsay
Purdy, Sarah
Metcalfe, Chris
Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care
title Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care
title_full Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care
title_fullStr Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care
title_full_unstemmed Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care
title_short Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care
title_sort choice of moisturiser for eczema treatment (comet): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012021
work_keys_str_mv AT riddmatthewj choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT garfieldkirsty choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT gauntdaisym choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT hollinghurstsandra choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT redmondniamhm choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT powellkingsley choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT wilsonvictoria choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT guyrichardh choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT ballnicola choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT shawlindsay choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT purdysarah choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare
AT metcalfechris choiceofmoisturiserforeczematreatmentcometfeasibilitystudyofarandomisedcontrolledparallelgrouptrialinchildrenrecruitedfromprimarycare