Cargando…

Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders

Aims and Background: People living with mental disorders experience a disproportionately higher burden of tobacco-related disease than the general population. Long-term substitution with less harmful nicotine products could reduce the tobacco-related harm among this population. This study investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meurk, Carla, Ford, Pauline, Sharma, Ratika, Fitzgerald, Lisa, Gartner, Coral
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27886046
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111166
_version_ 1782470584779669504
author Meurk, Carla
Ford, Pauline
Sharma, Ratika
Fitzgerald, Lisa
Gartner, Coral
author_facet Meurk, Carla
Ford, Pauline
Sharma, Ratika
Fitzgerald, Lisa
Gartner, Coral
author_sort Meurk, Carla
collection PubMed
description Aims and Background: People living with mental disorders experience a disproportionately higher burden of tobacco-related disease than the general population. Long-term substitution with less harmful nicotine products could reduce the tobacco-related harm among this population. This study investigated the views and preferences of people with mental health disorders about different nicotine products and their use as long-term substitutes for cigarettes. Methods: Semi-structured focus group discussion followed by a brief questionnaire. The discussion transcripts were analysed for content and themes and quantitative data summarised with descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty-nine participants took part in four focus groups. Vaping devices were the most acceptable nicotine products discussed; however preferences for nicotine products were individual and varied along aesthetic, pragmatic, sensory and symbolic dimensions. The concept of tobacco harm reduction was unfamiliar to participants, however they generally agreed with the logic of replacing cigarettes with less harmful nicotine products. Barriers to activating tobacco harm reduction included the symbolism of smoking and quitting; the importance placed on health; the consumer appeal of alternatives; and cost implications. Discussion and Conclusions: Engaging this population in tobacco harm reduction options will require communication that challenges black and white thinking (a conceptual framework in which smoking cigarettes or quitting all nicotine are the only legitimate options) as in practice this serves to support the continuance of smoking. Consumers should be encouraged to trial a range of nicotine products to find the most acceptable alternative to smoking that reduces health harms. Providing incentives to switch to nicotine products could help overcome barriers to using less harmful nicotine products among mental health consumers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5129376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51293762016-12-11 Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders Meurk, Carla Ford, Pauline Sharma, Ratika Fitzgerald, Lisa Gartner, Coral Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Aims and Background: People living with mental disorders experience a disproportionately higher burden of tobacco-related disease than the general population. Long-term substitution with less harmful nicotine products could reduce the tobacco-related harm among this population. This study investigated the views and preferences of people with mental health disorders about different nicotine products and their use as long-term substitutes for cigarettes. Methods: Semi-structured focus group discussion followed by a brief questionnaire. The discussion transcripts were analysed for content and themes and quantitative data summarised with descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty-nine participants took part in four focus groups. Vaping devices were the most acceptable nicotine products discussed; however preferences for nicotine products were individual and varied along aesthetic, pragmatic, sensory and symbolic dimensions. The concept of tobacco harm reduction was unfamiliar to participants, however they generally agreed with the logic of replacing cigarettes with less harmful nicotine products. Barriers to activating tobacco harm reduction included the symbolism of smoking and quitting; the importance placed on health; the consumer appeal of alternatives; and cost implications. Discussion and Conclusions: Engaging this population in tobacco harm reduction options will require communication that challenges black and white thinking (a conceptual framework in which smoking cigarettes or quitting all nicotine are the only legitimate options) as in practice this serves to support the continuance of smoking. Consumers should be encouraged to trial a range of nicotine products to find the most acceptable alternative to smoking that reduces health harms. Providing incentives to switch to nicotine products could help overcome barriers to using less harmful nicotine products among mental health consumers. MDPI 2016-11-23 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5129376/ /pubmed/27886046 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111166 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Meurk, Carla
Ford, Pauline
Sharma, Ratika
Fitzgerald, Lisa
Gartner, Coral
Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders
title Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders
title_full Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders
title_fullStr Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders
title_short Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders
title_sort views and preferences for nicotine products as an alternative to smoking: a focus group study of people living with mental disorders
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27886046
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111166
work_keys_str_mv AT meurkcarla viewsandpreferencesfornicotineproductsasanalternativetosmokingafocusgroupstudyofpeoplelivingwithmentaldisorders
AT fordpauline viewsandpreferencesfornicotineproductsasanalternativetosmokingafocusgroupstudyofpeoplelivingwithmentaldisorders
AT sharmaratika viewsandpreferencesfornicotineproductsasanalternativetosmokingafocusgroupstudyofpeoplelivingwithmentaldisorders
AT fitzgeraldlisa viewsandpreferencesfornicotineproductsasanalternativetosmokingafocusgroupstudyofpeoplelivingwithmentaldisorders
AT gartnercoral viewsandpreferencesfornicotineproductsasanalternativetosmokingafocusgroupstudyofpeoplelivingwithmentaldisorders