Cargando…
GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world
The performance of a drug in a clinical trial setting often does not reflect its effect in daily clinical practice. In this third of three reviews, we examine the applications that have been used in the literature to predict real‐world effectiveness from randomized controlled trial efficacy data. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1202 |
_version_ | 1782470612557496320 |
---|---|
author | Panayidou, Klea Gsteiger, Sandro Egger, Matthias Kilcher, Gablu Carreras, Máximo Efthimiou, Orestis Debray, Thomas P. A. Trelle, Sven Hummel, Noemi |
author_facet | Panayidou, Klea Gsteiger, Sandro Egger, Matthias Kilcher, Gablu Carreras, Máximo Efthimiou, Orestis Debray, Thomas P. A. Trelle, Sven Hummel, Noemi |
author_sort | Panayidou, Klea |
collection | PubMed |
description | The performance of a drug in a clinical trial setting often does not reflect its effect in daily clinical practice. In this third of three reviews, we examine the applications that have been used in the literature to predict real‐world effectiveness from randomized controlled trial efficacy data. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE from inception to March 2014, the Cochrane Methodology Register, and websites of key journals and organisations and reference lists. We extracted data on the type of model and predictions, data sources, validation and sensitivity analyses, disease area and software. We identified 12 articles in which four approaches were used: multi‐state models, discrete event simulation models, physiology‐based models and survival and generalized linear models. Studies predicted outcomes over longer time periods in different patient populations, including patients with lower levels of adherence or persistence to treatment or examined doses not tested in trials. Eight studies included individual patient data. Seven examined cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and three neurological conditions. Most studies included sensitivity analyses, but external validation was performed in only three studies. We conclude that mathematical modelling to predict real‐world effectiveness of drug interventions is not widely used at present and not well validated. © 2016 The Authors Research Synthesis Methods Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5129568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51295682016-11-30 GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world Panayidou, Klea Gsteiger, Sandro Egger, Matthias Kilcher, Gablu Carreras, Máximo Efthimiou, Orestis Debray, Thomas P. A. Trelle, Sven Hummel, Noemi Res Synth Methods Tutorials The performance of a drug in a clinical trial setting often does not reflect its effect in daily clinical practice. In this third of three reviews, we examine the applications that have been used in the literature to predict real‐world effectiveness from randomized controlled trial efficacy data. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE from inception to March 2014, the Cochrane Methodology Register, and websites of key journals and organisations and reference lists. We extracted data on the type of model and predictions, data sources, validation and sensitivity analyses, disease area and software. We identified 12 articles in which four approaches were used: multi‐state models, discrete event simulation models, physiology‐based models and survival and generalized linear models. Studies predicted outcomes over longer time periods in different patient populations, including patients with lower levels of adherence or persistence to treatment or examined doses not tested in trials. Eight studies included individual patient data. Seven examined cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and three neurological conditions. Most studies included sensitivity analyses, but external validation was performed in only three studies. We conclude that mathematical modelling to predict real‐world effectiveness of drug interventions is not widely used at present and not well validated. © 2016 The Authors Research Synthesis Methods Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-16 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5129568/ /pubmed/27529762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1202 Text en © 2016 The Authors Research Synthesis Methods Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Tutorials Panayidou, Klea Gsteiger, Sandro Egger, Matthias Kilcher, Gablu Carreras, Máximo Efthimiou, Orestis Debray, Thomas P. A. Trelle, Sven Hummel, Noemi GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world |
title | GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world |
title_full | GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world |
title_fullStr | GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world |
title_full_unstemmed | GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world |
title_short | GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world |
title_sort | getreal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world |
topic | Tutorials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panayidouklea getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT gsteigersandro getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT eggermatthias getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT kilchergablu getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT carrerasmaximo getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT efthimiouorestis getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT debraythomaspa getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT trellesven getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT hummelnoemi getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld AT getrealinmathematicalmodellingareviewofstudiespredictingdrugeffectivenessintherealworld |