Cargando…
The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?
BACKGROUND: Population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is widely recommended, and members of the eligible screening population seem to be positive about it. However, it is not well known how people outside the eligible screening population view CRC screening, and whether they are supportive...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27899154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3870-7 |
_version_ | 1782470630181961728 |
---|---|
author | Douma, Linda N. Uiters, Ellen Timmermans, Danielle R. M. |
author_facet | Douma, Linda N. Uiters, Ellen Timmermans, Danielle R. M. |
author_sort | Douma, Linda N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is widely recommended, and members of the eligible screening population seem to be positive about it. However, it is not well known how people outside the eligible screening population view CRC screening, and whether they are supportive of the government providing this. Public opinion may affect people’s personal views and their screening decision. The aim of our study was to examine the opinion of the Dutch general public regarding the national CRC screening programme. METHOD: An online survey was carried out in a Dutch population sample of adults aged 18 and older, assessing level of support, personal attitude, collective attitude, perceived social norm, awareness, and knowledge regarding the CRC screening programme. RESULTS: The response rate was 56% (n = 1679/3000). Generally, the Dutch public are positive about and supportive of the CRC screening programme. We found the biggest proportion of support (86%) when people were asked directly. A smaller proportion (48%) was supportive when people had to choose between other options concerning how the government could possibly deal with CRC. People report knowing more about the benefits of CRC screening than about its possible harms and risks. Many people found it difficult to answer the knowledge questions that asked about numerical information concerning CRC screening correctly. CONCLUSION: People were less supportive of the CRC screening programme when having to choose between other options concerning dealing with CRC, and their support may not be based on a full comprehension of what CRC screening entails. Further research is needed to establish what knowledge people need in order to form a well-founded opinion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3870-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5129673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51296732016-12-12 The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? Douma, Linda N. Uiters, Ellen Timmermans, Danielle R. M. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is widely recommended, and members of the eligible screening population seem to be positive about it. However, it is not well known how people outside the eligible screening population view CRC screening, and whether they are supportive of the government providing this. Public opinion may affect people’s personal views and their screening decision. The aim of our study was to examine the opinion of the Dutch general public regarding the national CRC screening programme. METHOD: An online survey was carried out in a Dutch population sample of adults aged 18 and older, assessing level of support, personal attitude, collective attitude, perceived social norm, awareness, and knowledge regarding the CRC screening programme. RESULTS: The response rate was 56% (n = 1679/3000). Generally, the Dutch public are positive about and supportive of the CRC screening programme. We found the biggest proportion of support (86%) when people were asked directly. A smaller proportion (48%) was supportive when people had to choose between other options concerning how the government could possibly deal with CRC. People report knowing more about the benefits of CRC screening than about its possible harms and risks. Many people found it difficult to answer the knowledge questions that asked about numerical information concerning CRC screening correctly. CONCLUSION: People were less supportive of the CRC screening programme when having to choose between other options concerning dealing with CRC, and their support may not be based on a full comprehension of what CRC screening entails. Further research is needed to establish what knowledge people need in order to form a well-founded opinion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3870-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5129673/ /pubmed/27899154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3870-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Douma, Linda N. Uiters, Ellen Timmermans, Danielle R. M. The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? |
title | The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? |
title_full | The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? |
title_fullStr | The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? |
title_short | The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? |
title_sort | dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27899154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3870-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doumalindan thedutchpublicarepositiveaboutthecolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammebutisthisawellinformedopinion AT uitersellen thedutchpublicarepositiveaboutthecolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammebutisthisawellinformedopinion AT timmermansdaniellerm thedutchpublicarepositiveaboutthecolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammebutisthisawellinformedopinion AT doumalindan dutchpublicarepositiveaboutthecolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammebutisthisawellinformedopinion AT uitersellen dutchpublicarepositiveaboutthecolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammebutisthisawellinformedopinion AT timmermansdaniellerm dutchpublicarepositiveaboutthecolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammebutisthisawellinformedopinion |