Cargando…
Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of (pre)cancerous colorectal lesions are higher in men than in women, although transition rates from advanced lesions to cancer is similar in both sexes. Our aim was to investigate whether the sex-specific difference in incidence of premalignant colorectal lesions might be exp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.324 |
_version_ | 1782470636135776256 |
---|---|
author | Waldmann, Elisabeth Heinze, Georg Ferlitsch, Arnulf GessI, Irina Sallinger, Daniela Jeschek, Philip Britto-Arias, Martha Salzl, Petra Fasching, Elisabeth Jilma, Bernd Kundi, Michael Trauner, Michael Ferlitsch, Monika |
author_facet | Waldmann, Elisabeth Heinze, Georg Ferlitsch, Arnulf GessI, Irina Sallinger, Daniela Jeschek, Philip Britto-Arias, Martha Salzl, Petra Fasching, Elisabeth Jilma, Bernd Kundi, Michael Trauner, Michael Ferlitsch, Monika |
author_sort | Waldmann, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prevalence of (pre)cancerous colorectal lesions are higher in men than in women, although transition rates from advanced lesions to cancer is similar in both sexes. Our aim was to investigate whether the sex-specific difference in incidence of premalignant colorectal lesions might be explained by the impact of risk factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study analysing health check-up examinations and screening colonoscopies performed within a national quality assurance program. RESULTS: A total of 25 409 patients were included in this study, 50.8% were women. Median age for both sexes was 60 years (interquartile range (IQR) 54–67). A multivariable model showed that risk factors mediated only 0.6 of the 10.4% gender gap in adenoma and 0.47 of the 3.2% gender gap in advanced adenoma detection rate. Smoking was the only independent risk factor with a varying sex-specific effect (men OR 1.46, CI 1.29, 1.64, women OR 1.76, CI 1.53, 2.06) and advanced adenomas (men OR 1.06, CI 0.80–1.42; women OR 2.08, CI 1.52–2.83). Independent risk factors for adenomas were BMI (OR 1.35 per IQR, CI 1.25–1.47) and triglyceride level (OR 1.03 per IQR, CI 1.00–1.06); for advanced adenomas physical activity (none vs regular: OR 1.54, CI 1.18–2.00, occasional vs regular: OR 1.17, CI 1.00–1.38), cholesterol level (OR 1.13 per IQR, CI 1.02–1.25), blood glucose level (OR 1.05 per IQR, CI 1.01–1.09) and alcohol score (OR 1.09 per IQR, CI 1.01–1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors cannot explain higher prevalence rates in men. Results of this study strongly underline the need for sex-specific screening recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5129825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51298252017-11-22 Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men Waldmann, Elisabeth Heinze, Georg Ferlitsch, Arnulf GessI, Irina Sallinger, Daniela Jeschek, Philip Britto-Arias, Martha Salzl, Petra Fasching, Elisabeth Jilma, Bernd Kundi, Michael Trauner, Michael Ferlitsch, Monika Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Prevalence of (pre)cancerous colorectal lesions are higher in men than in women, although transition rates from advanced lesions to cancer is similar in both sexes. Our aim was to investigate whether the sex-specific difference in incidence of premalignant colorectal lesions might be explained by the impact of risk factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study analysing health check-up examinations and screening colonoscopies performed within a national quality assurance program. RESULTS: A total of 25 409 patients were included in this study, 50.8% were women. Median age for both sexes was 60 years (interquartile range (IQR) 54–67). A multivariable model showed that risk factors mediated only 0.6 of the 10.4% gender gap in adenoma and 0.47 of the 3.2% gender gap in advanced adenoma detection rate. Smoking was the only independent risk factor with a varying sex-specific effect (men OR 1.46, CI 1.29, 1.64, women OR 1.76, CI 1.53, 2.06) and advanced adenomas (men OR 1.06, CI 0.80–1.42; women OR 2.08, CI 1.52–2.83). Independent risk factors for adenomas were BMI (OR 1.35 per IQR, CI 1.25–1.47) and triglyceride level (OR 1.03 per IQR, CI 1.00–1.06); for advanced adenomas physical activity (none vs regular: OR 1.54, CI 1.18–2.00, occasional vs regular: OR 1.17, CI 1.00–1.38), cholesterol level (OR 1.13 per IQR, CI 1.02–1.25), blood glucose level (OR 1.05 per IQR, CI 1.01–1.09) and alcohol score (OR 1.09 per IQR, CI 1.01–1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors cannot explain higher prevalence rates in men. Results of this study strongly underline the need for sex-specific screening recommendations. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-22 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5129825/ /pubmed/27764840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.324 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Waldmann, Elisabeth Heinze, Georg Ferlitsch, Arnulf GessI, Irina Sallinger, Daniela Jeschek, Philip Britto-Arias, Martha Salzl, Petra Fasching, Elisabeth Jilma, Bernd Kundi, Michael Trauner, Michael Ferlitsch, Monika Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men |
title | Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men |
title_full | Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men |
title_fullStr | Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men |
title_short | Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men |
title_sort | risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5129825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waldmannelisabeth riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT heinzegeorg riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT ferlitscharnulf riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT gessiirina riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT sallingerdaniela riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT jeschekphilip riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT brittoariasmartha riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT salzlpetra riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT faschingelisabeth riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT jilmabernd riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT kundimichael riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT traunermichael riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen AT ferlitschmonika riskfactorscannotexplainthehigherprevalenceratesofprecancerouscolorectallesionsinmen |