Cargando…

Radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer

This study aims to compare the radiobiological response of two stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) schedules for patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using radiobiological modeling methods. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based SBRT plans were designed using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Bao-tian, Lin, Zhu, Lin, Pei-xian, Lu, Jia-yang, Chen, Chuang-zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5130041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27203739
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9442
_version_ 1782470673462984704
author Huang, Bao-tian
Lin, Zhu
Lin, Pei-xian
Lu, Jia-yang
Chen, Chuang-zhen
author_facet Huang, Bao-tian
Lin, Zhu
Lin, Pei-xian
Lu, Jia-yang
Chen, Chuang-zhen
author_sort Huang, Bao-tian
collection PubMed
description This study aims to compare the radiobiological response of two stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) schedules for patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using radiobiological modeling methods. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based SBRT plans were designed using two dose schedules of 1 × 34 Gy (34 Gy in 1 fraction) and 4 × 12 Gy (48 Gy in 4 fractions) for 19 patients diagnosed with primary stage I NSCLC. Dose to the gross target volume (GTV), planning target volume (PTV), lung and chest wall (CW) were converted to biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction (EQD(2)) for comparison. Five different radiobiological models were employed to predict the tumor control probability (TCP) value. Three additional models were utilized to estimate the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) value for the lung and the modified equivalent uniform dose (mEUD) value to the CW. Our result indicates that the 1 × 34 Gy dose schedule provided a higher EQD(2) dose to the tumor, lung and CW. Radiobiological modeling revealed that the TCP value for the tumor, NTCP value for the lung and mEUD value for the CW were 7.4% (in absolute value), 7.2% (in absolute value) and 71.8% (in relative value) higher on average, respectively, using the 1 × 34 Gy dose schedule.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5130041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51300412016-12-11 Radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer Huang, Bao-tian Lin, Zhu Lin, Pei-xian Lu, Jia-yang Chen, Chuang-zhen Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper This study aims to compare the radiobiological response of two stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) schedules for patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using radiobiological modeling methods. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based SBRT plans were designed using two dose schedules of 1 × 34 Gy (34 Gy in 1 fraction) and 4 × 12 Gy (48 Gy in 4 fractions) for 19 patients diagnosed with primary stage I NSCLC. Dose to the gross target volume (GTV), planning target volume (PTV), lung and chest wall (CW) were converted to biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction (EQD(2)) for comparison. Five different radiobiological models were employed to predict the tumor control probability (TCP) value. Three additional models were utilized to estimate the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) value for the lung and the modified equivalent uniform dose (mEUD) value to the CW. Our result indicates that the 1 × 34 Gy dose schedule provided a higher EQD(2) dose to the tumor, lung and CW. Radiobiological modeling revealed that the TCP value for the tumor, NTCP value for the lung and mEUD value for the CW were 7.4% (in absolute value), 7.2% (in absolute value) and 71.8% (in relative value) higher on average, respectively, using the 1 × 34 Gy dose schedule. Impact Journals LLC 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5130041/ /pubmed/27203739 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9442 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Huang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Huang, Bao-tian
Lin, Zhu
Lin, Pei-xian
Lu, Jia-yang
Chen, Chuang-zhen
Radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer
title Radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer
title_full Radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer
title_short Radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer
title_sort radiobiological modeling of two stereotactic body radiotherapy schedules in patients with stage i peripheral non-small cell lung cancer
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5130041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27203739
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9442
work_keys_str_mv AT huangbaotian radiobiologicalmodelingoftwostereotacticbodyradiotherapyschedulesinpatientswithstageiperipheralnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT linzhu radiobiologicalmodelingoftwostereotacticbodyradiotherapyschedulesinpatientswithstageiperipheralnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT linpeixian radiobiologicalmodelingoftwostereotacticbodyradiotherapyschedulesinpatientswithstageiperipheralnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT lujiayang radiobiologicalmodelingoftwostereotacticbodyradiotherapyschedulesinpatientswithstageiperipheralnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chenchuangzhen radiobiologicalmodelingoftwostereotacticbodyradiotherapyschedulesinpatientswithstageiperipheralnonsmallcelllungcancer