Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided cannulation of deep mid-arm veins by a modified Seldinger (US-Seldinger) technique has been demonstrated to yield better puncture success rates and lower postoperative complication rates than direct cannulation of superficial veins near the elbow with a short peripheral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Jianghong, Liu, Liping, Xie, Jing, Hu, Lingli, Yang, Qiaolan, Wang, Honghong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5130933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3698-8
_version_ 1782470804156448768
author Tan, Jianghong
Liu, Liping
Xie, Jing
Hu, Lingli
Yang, Qiaolan
Wang, Honghong
author_facet Tan, Jianghong
Liu, Liping
Xie, Jing
Hu, Lingli
Yang, Qiaolan
Wang, Honghong
author_sort Tan, Jianghong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided cannulation of deep mid-arm veins by a modified Seldinger (US-Seldinger) technique has been demonstrated to yield better puncture success rates and lower postoperative complication rates than direct cannulation of superficial veins near the elbow with a short peripheral cannula and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion through the cannula (non-US conventional method). Economic factors have been evaluated across different operators (i.e. nurses, radiologists, and general practitioners) and different venous catheter types (i.e. PICCs vs. central venous catheters). However, to our knowledge, data describing the economic evaluation on the aforementioned modified Seldinger technique are lacking. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of US-Seldinger technique (experimental group) compared with that of the non-US conventional method based on direct vein visualization (control group). RESULTS: A cohort of 360 subjects were assigned randomly to the experimental and control groups. Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) analyses indicated that the effectiveness index (EI) for the experimental group was 89.29% (final CER = 3732.75), whereas that for the control group was 59.18% (final CER = 2492.98). CONCLUSION: The US-Seldinger technique was found to be more cost-effective than the non-US conventional method. These findings support the use of the former in place of the traditional latter technique as a routine puncture technique and suggest that the update would improve intravenous therapy treatment for patients needing PICCs. This study should serve as a reference for national healthcare policy. Trial registration ChiCTR-TRC-14004993 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3698-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5130933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51309332016-12-19 Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) Tan, Jianghong Liu, Liping Xie, Jing Hu, Lingli Yang, Qiaolan Wang, Honghong Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided cannulation of deep mid-arm veins by a modified Seldinger (US-Seldinger) technique has been demonstrated to yield better puncture success rates and lower postoperative complication rates than direct cannulation of superficial veins near the elbow with a short peripheral cannula and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion through the cannula (non-US conventional method). Economic factors have been evaluated across different operators (i.e. nurses, radiologists, and general practitioners) and different venous catheter types (i.e. PICCs vs. central venous catheters). However, to our knowledge, data describing the economic evaluation on the aforementioned modified Seldinger technique are lacking. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of US-Seldinger technique (experimental group) compared with that of the non-US conventional method based on direct vein visualization (control group). RESULTS: A cohort of 360 subjects were assigned randomly to the experimental and control groups. Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) analyses indicated that the effectiveness index (EI) for the experimental group was 89.29% (final CER = 3732.75), whereas that for the control group was 59.18% (final CER = 2492.98). CONCLUSION: The US-Seldinger technique was found to be more cost-effective than the non-US conventional method. These findings support the use of the former in place of the traditional latter technique as a routine puncture technique and suggest that the update would improve intravenous therapy treatment for patients needing PICCs. This study should serve as a reference for national healthcare policy. Trial registration ChiCTR-TRC-14004993 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3698-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5130933/ /pubmed/27995028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3698-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Tan, Jianghong
Liu, Liping
Xie, Jing
Hu, Lingli
Yang, Qiaolan
Wang, Honghong
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (picc)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5130933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3698-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tanjianghong costeffectivenessanalysisofultrasoundguidedseldingerperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspicc
AT liuliping costeffectivenessanalysisofultrasoundguidedseldingerperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspicc
AT xiejing costeffectivenessanalysisofultrasoundguidedseldingerperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspicc
AT hulingli costeffectivenessanalysisofultrasoundguidedseldingerperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspicc
AT yangqiaolan costeffectivenessanalysisofultrasoundguidedseldingerperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspicc
AT wanghonghong costeffectivenessanalysisofultrasoundguidedseldingerperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspicc