Cargando…

Pixel or Paper? Validation of a Mobile Technology for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND: In the management of chronic disease, new models for telemonitoring of patients combined with the choice of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) are being encouraged, with a clear improvement of both patients’ and parents’ quality of life. An Italian study demonstrated that ePRO w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Epis, Oscar Massimiliano, Casu, Cinzia, Belloli, Laura, Schito, Emanuela, Filippini, Davide, Muscarà, Marina, Gentile, Maria Giovanna, Perez Cagnone, Paula Carina, Venerelli, Chiara, Sonnati, Massimo, Schiavetti, Irene, Bruschi, Eleonora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852561
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.5631
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In the management of chronic disease, new models for telemonitoring of patients combined with the choice of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) are being encouraged, with a clear improvement of both patients’ and parents’ quality of life. An Italian study demonstrated that ePRO were welcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with excellent matching data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of agreement between electronic and paper-and-pencil questionnaire responses. METHODS: This is an observational prospective study. Patients were randomly assigned to first complete the questionnaire by paper and pencil and then by tablet or in the opposite order. The questionnaire consisted of 3 independent self-assessment visual rating scales (Visual Analog Scale, Global Health score, Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity) commonly used in different adult patients, including those with rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: A total of 185 consecutive RA patients were admitted to hospital and were enrolled and completed the questionnaire both on paper and on electronic versions. For all the evaluated items, the intrarater degree of agreement between 2 approaches was found to be excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient>0.75, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: An electronic questionnaire is uploaded in a dedicated Web-based tool that could implement a telemonitoring system aimed at improving the follow-up of RA patients. High intrarater reliability between paper and electronic methods of data collection encourage the use of a new digital app with consequent benefit for the overall health care system.