Cargando…
The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdomin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656 |
_version_ | 1782470859080859648 |
---|---|
author | Ibrahim, El-Sayed H. Cernigliaro, Joseph G. Bridges, Mellena D. Pooley, Robert A. Haley, William E. |
author_facet | Ibrahim, El-Sayed H. Cernigliaro, Joseph G. Bridges, Mellena D. Pooley, Robert A. Haley, William E. |
author_sort | Ibrahim, El-Sayed H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI exams within 30 days were studied. The images were reviewed by two expert radiologists blinded to the patients' respective radiological diagnoses. The study consisted of four steps: (1) reviewing the MRI images and determining whether any kidney stone(s) are identified; (2) reviewing the corresponding CT images and confirming whether kidney stones are identified; (3) reviewing the MRI images a second time, armed with the information from the corresponding CT, noting whether any kidney stones are positively identified that were previously missed; (4) for all stones MRI-confirmed on previous steps, the radiologist experts being asked to answer whether in retrospect, with knowledge of size and location on corresponding CT, these stones would be affirmed as confidently identified on MRI or not. In this best-case scenario involving knowledge of stones and their locations on concurrent CT, radiologist experts detected 19% of kidney stones on MRI, with stone size being a major factor for stone identification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5131253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51312532016-12-15 The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study Ibrahim, El-Sayed H. Cernigliaro, Joseph G. Bridges, Mellena D. Pooley, Robert A. Haley, William E. Int J Biomed Imaging Research Article The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI exams within 30 days were studied. The images were reviewed by two expert radiologists blinded to the patients' respective radiological diagnoses. The study consisted of four steps: (1) reviewing the MRI images and determining whether any kidney stone(s) are identified; (2) reviewing the corresponding CT images and confirming whether kidney stones are identified; (3) reviewing the MRI images a second time, armed with the information from the corresponding CT, noting whether any kidney stones are positively identified that were previously missed; (4) for all stones MRI-confirmed on previous steps, the radiologist experts being asked to answer whether in retrospect, with knowledge of size and location on corresponding CT, these stones would be affirmed as confidently identified on MRI or not. In this best-case scenario involving knowledge of stones and their locations on concurrent CT, radiologist experts detected 19% of kidney stones on MRI, with stone size being a major factor for stone identification. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5131253/ /pubmed/27980535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656 Text en Copyright © 2016 El-Sayed H. Ibrahim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ibrahim, El-Sayed H. Cernigliaro, Joseph G. Bridges, Mellena D. Pooley, Robert A. Haley, William E. The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study |
title | The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | capabilities and limitations of clinical magnetic resonance imaging for detecting kidney stones: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ibrahimelsayedh thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT cernigliarojosephg thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT bridgesmellenad thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT pooleyroberta thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT haleywilliame thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT ibrahimelsayedh capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT cernigliarojosephg capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT bridgesmellenad capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT pooleyroberta capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy AT haleywilliame capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy |