Cargando…

The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study

The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdomin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, El-Sayed H., Cernigliaro, Joseph G., Bridges, Mellena D., Pooley, Robert A., Haley, William E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656
_version_ 1782470859080859648
author Ibrahim, El-Sayed H.
Cernigliaro, Joseph G.
Bridges, Mellena D.
Pooley, Robert A.
Haley, William E.
author_facet Ibrahim, El-Sayed H.
Cernigliaro, Joseph G.
Bridges, Mellena D.
Pooley, Robert A.
Haley, William E.
author_sort Ibrahim, El-Sayed H.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI exams within 30 days were studied. The images were reviewed by two expert radiologists blinded to the patients' respective radiological diagnoses. The study consisted of four steps: (1) reviewing the MRI images and determining whether any kidney stone(s) are identified; (2) reviewing the corresponding CT images and confirming whether kidney stones are identified; (3) reviewing the MRI images a second time, armed with the information from the corresponding CT, noting whether any kidney stones are positively identified that were previously missed; (4) for all stones MRI-confirmed on previous steps, the radiologist experts being asked to answer whether in retrospect, with knowledge of size and location on corresponding CT, these stones would be affirmed as confidently identified on MRI or not. In this best-case scenario involving knowledge of stones and their locations on concurrent CT, radiologist experts detected 19% of kidney stones on MRI, with stone size being a major factor for stone identification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5131253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51312532016-12-15 The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study Ibrahim, El-Sayed H. Cernigliaro, Joseph G. Bridges, Mellena D. Pooley, Robert A. Haley, William E. Int J Biomed Imaging Research Article The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI exams within 30 days were studied. The images were reviewed by two expert radiologists blinded to the patients' respective radiological diagnoses. The study consisted of four steps: (1) reviewing the MRI images and determining whether any kidney stone(s) are identified; (2) reviewing the corresponding CT images and confirming whether kidney stones are identified; (3) reviewing the MRI images a second time, armed with the information from the corresponding CT, noting whether any kidney stones are positively identified that were previously missed; (4) for all stones MRI-confirmed on previous steps, the radiologist experts being asked to answer whether in retrospect, with knowledge of size and location on corresponding CT, these stones would be affirmed as confidently identified on MRI or not. In this best-case scenario involving knowledge of stones and their locations on concurrent CT, radiologist experts detected 19% of kidney stones on MRI, with stone size being a major factor for stone identification. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5131253/ /pubmed/27980535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656 Text en Copyright © 2016 El-Sayed H. Ibrahim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ibrahim, El-Sayed H.
Cernigliaro, Joseph G.
Bridges, Mellena D.
Pooley, Robert A.
Haley, William E.
The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_full The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_short The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_sort capabilities and limitations of clinical magnetic resonance imaging for detecting kidney stones: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimelsayedh thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT cernigliarojosephg thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT bridgesmellenad thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT pooleyroberta thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT haleywilliame thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT ibrahimelsayedh capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT cernigliarojosephg capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT bridgesmellenad capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT pooleyroberta capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT haleywilliame capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy