Cargando…

Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises

Here we reconstruct the evolutionary shift towards floral simulation in orchid mantises and suggest female predatory selection as the likely driving force behind the development of extreme sexual size dimorphism. Through analysis of body size data and phylogenetic modelling of trait evolution, we re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svenson, Gavin J., Brannoch, Sydney K., Rodrigues, Henrique M., O’Hanlon, James C., Wieland, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37753
_version_ 1782470880614416384
author Svenson, Gavin J.
Brannoch, Sydney K.
Rodrigues, Henrique M.
O’Hanlon, James C.
Wieland, Frank
author_facet Svenson, Gavin J.
Brannoch, Sydney K.
Rodrigues, Henrique M.
O’Hanlon, James C.
Wieland, Frank
author_sort Svenson, Gavin J.
collection PubMed
description Here we reconstruct the evolutionary shift towards floral simulation in orchid mantises and suggest female predatory selection as the likely driving force behind the development of extreme sexual size dimorphism. Through analysis of body size data and phylogenetic modelling of trait evolution, we recovered an ancestral shift towards sexual dimorphisms in both size and appearance in a lineage of flower-associated praying mantises. Sedentary female flower mantises dramatically increased in size prior to a transition from camouflaged, ambush predation to a floral simulation strategy, gaining access to, and visually attracting, a novel resource: large pollinating insects. Male flower mantises, however, remained small and mobile to facilitate mate-finding and reproductive success, consistent with ancestral male life strategy. Although moderate sexual size dimorphisms are common in many arthropod lineages, the predominant explanation is female size increase for increased fecundity. However, sex-dependent selective pressures acting outside of female fecundity have been suggested as mechanisms behind niche dimorphisms. Our hypothesised role of predatory selection acting on females to generate both extreme sexual size dimorphism coupled with niche dimorphism is novel among arthropods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5131372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51313722016-12-15 Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises Svenson, Gavin J. Brannoch, Sydney K. Rodrigues, Henrique M. O’Hanlon, James C. Wieland, Frank Sci Rep Article Here we reconstruct the evolutionary shift towards floral simulation in orchid mantises and suggest female predatory selection as the likely driving force behind the development of extreme sexual size dimorphism. Through analysis of body size data and phylogenetic modelling of trait evolution, we recovered an ancestral shift towards sexual dimorphisms in both size and appearance in a lineage of flower-associated praying mantises. Sedentary female flower mantises dramatically increased in size prior to a transition from camouflaged, ambush predation to a floral simulation strategy, gaining access to, and visually attracting, a novel resource: large pollinating insects. Male flower mantises, however, remained small and mobile to facilitate mate-finding and reproductive success, consistent with ancestral male life strategy. Although moderate sexual size dimorphisms are common in many arthropod lineages, the predominant explanation is female size increase for increased fecundity. However, sex-dependent selective pressures acting outside of female fecundity have been suggested as mechanisms behind niche dimorphisms. Our hypothesised role of predatory selection acting on females to generate both extreme sexual size dimorphism coupled with niche dimorphism is novel among arthropods. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5131372/ /pubmed/27905469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37753 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Svenson, Gavin J.
Brannoch, Sydney K.
Rodrigues, Henrique M.
O’Hanlon, James C.
Wieland, Frank
Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises
title Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises
title_full Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises
title_fullStr Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises
title_full_unstemmed Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises
title_short Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises
title_sort selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37753
work_keys_str_mv AT svensongavinj selectionforpredationnotfemalefecundityexplainssexualsizedimorphismintheorchidmantises
AT brannochsydneyk selectionforpredationnotfemalefecundityexplainssexualsizedimorphismintheorchidmantises
AT rodrigueshenriquem selectionforpredationnotfemalefecundityexplainssexualsizedimorphismintheorchidmantises
AT ohanlonjamesc selectionforpredationnotfemalefecundityexplainssexualsizedimorphismintheorchidmantises
AT wielandfrank selectionforpredationnotfemalefecundityexplainssexualsizedimorphismintheorchidmantises