Cargando…

The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Anatomy apps supplement traditional learning; however, it is unknown if their use can improve students’ outcome. The present study examined whether the use of anatomy apps improved student performance on a neuroanatomy assessment. METHODS: Second-year anatomy students, enrolled in a Bach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Amanda J., Stomski, Norman J., Losco, C. Dominique, Armson, Anthony J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0125-8
_version_ 1782470914412118016
author Meyer, Amanda J.
Stomski, Norman J.
Losco, C. Dominique
Armson, Anthony J.
author_facet Meyer, Amanda J.
Stomski, Norman J.
Losco, C. Dominique
Armson, Anthony J.
author_sort Meyer, Amanda J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anatomy apps supplement traditional learning; however, it is unknown if their use can improve students’ outcome. The present study examined whether the use of anatomy apps improved student performance on a neuroanatomy assessment. METHODS: Second-year anatomy students, enrolled in a Bachelor of Science with Chiropractic Major program, were randomly allocated to experimental and control groups in July 2015. Students completed the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS). The experimental group had access to iPads with four anatomy apps for three weekly classes (1.5 h each). One week after the last class, students were assessed by an online 30-question neuroanatomy test. Linear regression was used to examine the association between test scores and app use, gender, previous anatomy unit score and SDLRS scores. Students’ views on apps were collected by focus group discussion immediately after the test. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were obtained from n = 25 control and n = 25 experimental students. There was no association between app use and neuroanatomy assessment score (B = 1.75, 95 % CI: -0.340-3.840, p = 0.099). Only previous anatomy unit score (B = 0.348, 95 % CI: 0.214-0.483, p < 0.001) affected neuroanatomy assessment scores. Students favored apps with clinical images and features including identification pins, sliding bars and rotatable 3D images. CONCLUSIONS: App use did not enhance learning outcomes in a second-year anatomy unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5131529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51315292016-12-15 The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial Meyer, Amanda J. Stomski, Norman J. Losco, C. Dominique Armson, Anthony J. Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Anatomy apps supplement traditional learning; however, it is unknown if their use can improve students’ outcome. The present study examined whether the use of anatomy apps improved student performance on a neuroanatomy assessment. METHODS: Second-year anatomy students, enrolled in a Bachelor of Science with Chiropractic Major program, were randomly allocated to experimental and control groups in July 2015. Students completed the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS). The experimental group had access to iPads with four anatomy apps for three weekly classes (1.5 h each). One week after the last class, students were assessed by an online 30-question neuroanatomy test. Linear regression was used to examine the association between test scores and app use, gender, previous anatomy unit score and SDLRS scores. Students’ views on apps were collected by focus group discussion immediately after the test. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were obtained from n = 25 control and n = 25 experimental students. There was no association between app use and neuroanatomy assessment score (B = 1.75, 95 % CI: -0.340-3.840, p = 0.099). Only previous anatomy unit score (B = 0.348, 95 % CI: 0.214-0.483, p < 0.001) affected neuroanatomy assessment scores. Students favored apps with clinical images and features including identification pins, sliding bars and rotatable 3D images. CONCLUSIONS: App use did not enhance learning outcomes in a second-year anatomy unit. BioMed Central 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5131529/ /pubmed/27980723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0125-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Meyer, Amanda J.
Stomski, Norman J.
Losco, C. Dominique
Armson, Anthony J.
The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
title The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
title_full The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
title_short The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0125-8
work_keys_str_mv AT meyeramandaj theinfluenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stomskinormanj theinfluenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT loscocdominique theinfluenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT armsonanthonyj theinfluenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meyeramandaj influenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stomskinormanj influenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT loscocdominique influenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT armsonanthonyj influenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial