Cargando…
The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Anatomy apps supplement traditional learning; however, it is unknown if their use can improve students’ outcome. The present study examined whether the use of anatomy apps improved student performance on a neuroanatomy assessment. METHODS: Second-year anatomy students, enrolled in a Bach...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0125-8 |
_version_ | 1782470914412118016 |
---|---|
author | Meyer, Amanda J. Stomski, Norman J. Losco, C. Dominique Armson, Anthony J. |
author_facet | Meyer, Amanda J. Stomski, Norman J. Losco, C. Dominique Armson, Anthony J. |
author_sort | Meyer, Amanda J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anatomy apps supplement traditional learning; however, it is unknown if their use can improve students’ outcome. The present study examined whether the use of anatomy apps improved student performance on a neuroanatomy assessment. METHODS: Second-year anatomy students, enrolled in a Bachelor of Science with Chiropractic Major program, were randomly allocated to experimental and control groups in July 2015. Students completed the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS). The experimental group had access to iPads with four anatomy apps for three weekly classes (1.5 h each). One week after the last class, students were assessed by an online 30-question neuroanatomy test. Linear regression was used to examine the association between test scores and app use, gender, previous anatomy unit score and SDLRS scores. Students’ views on apps were collected by focus group discussion immediately after the test. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were obtained from n = 25 control and n = 25 experimental students. There was no association between app use and neuroanatomy assessment score (B = 1.75, 95 % CI: -0.340-3.840, p = 0.099). Only previous anatomy unit score (B = 0.348, 95 % CI: 0.214-0.483, p < 0.001) affected neuroanatomy assessment scores. Students favored apps with clinical images and features including identification pins, sliding bars and rotatable 3D images. CONCLUSIONS: App use did not enhance learning outcomes in a second-year anatomy unit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5131529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51315292016-12-15 The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial Meyer, Amanda J. Stomski, Norman J. Losco, C. Dominique Armson, Anthony J. Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Anatomy apps supplement traditional learning; however, it is unknown if their use can improve students’ outcome. The present study examined whether the use of anatomy apps improved student performance on a neuroanatomy assessment. METHODS: Second-year anatomy students, enrolled in a Bachelor of Science with Chiropractic Major program, were randomly allocated to experimental and control groups in July 2015. Students completed the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS). The experimental group had access to iPads with four anatomy apps for three weekly classes (1.5 h each). One week after the last class, students were assessed by an online 30-question neuroanatomy test. Linear regression was used to examine the association between test scores and app use, gender, previous anatomy unit score and SDLRS scores. Students’ views on apps were collected by focus group discussion immediately after the test. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were obtained from n = 25 control and n = 25 experimental students. There was no association between app use and neuroanatomy assessment score (B = 1.75, 95 % CI: -0.340-3.840, p = 0.099). Only previous anatomy unit score (B = 0.348, 95 % CI: 0.214-0.483, p < 0.001) affected neuroanatomy assessment scores. Students favored apps with clinical images and features including identification pins, sliding bars and rotatable 3D images. CONCLUSIONS: App use did not enhance learning outcomes in a second-year anatomy unit. BioMed Central 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5131529/ /pubmed/27980723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0125-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Meyer, Amanda J. Stomski, Norman J. Losco, C. Dominique Armson, Anthony J. The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial |
title | The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0125-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyeramandaj theinfluenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stomskinormanj theinfluenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT loscocdominique theinfluenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT armsonanthonyj theinfluenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT meyeramandaj influenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stomskinormanj influenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT loscocdominique influenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT armsonanthonyj influenceofanatomyappuseonchiropracticstudentslearningoutcomesarandomisedcontrolledtrial |