Cargando…

Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the accepted standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of a standardized approach with tailored care maps for pre- and postoperative care by comparing pain, nausea and patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grass, Fabian, Cachemaille, Matthieu, Blanc, Catherine, Fournier, Nicolas, Halkic, Nermin, Demartines, Nicolas, Hübner, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0194-6
_version_ 1782470914631270400
author Grass, Fabian
Cachemaille, Matthieu
Blanc, Catherine
Fournier, Nicolas
Halkic, Nermin
Demartines, Nicolas
Hübner, Martin
author_facet Grass, Fabian
Cachemaille, Matthieu
Blanc, Catherine
Fournier, Nicolas
Halkic, Nermin
Demartines, Nicolas
Hübner, Martin
author_sort Grass, Fabian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the accepted standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of a standardized approach with tailored care maps for pre- and postoperative care by comparing pain, nausea and patient satisfaction after elective and emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: From January 2014 until April 2015, data on pain and nausea management were prospectively recorded for all elective and emergency procedures in the department of visceral surgery. This prospective observational study compared consecutive laparoscopic elective vs. emergency cholecystectomies. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were used to measure pain, nausea, and satisfaction from recovery room until 96 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Final analysis included 168 (79%) elective cholecystectomies and 44 (21%) emergent procedures. Demographics (Age, gender, BMI and ASA-scores) were comparable between the 2 groups. In the emergency group, patients did not receive anxiolytic medication (0% vs.13%, p = 0.009) and less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis (77% vs. 97% p = <0.001). Perioperative pain management was similar in terms of opioid consumption (median amount of fentanyl 450ug [IQR 350-500] vs. 450ug [375-550], p = 0.456) and wound infiltration rates (24% vs. 25%, p = 0.799). Postoperative consumption of paracetamol, metamizole and opiod medications were similar between the 2 groups. VAS scores for pain (p = 0.191) and nausea (p = 0.392) were low for both groups. Patient satisfaction was equally high in both clinical settings (VAS 8.5 ± 1.1 vs. 8.6 ± 1.1, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: A standardized pathway allows equally successful control of pain and nausea after both elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was retrospectively registered by March 01, 2016 in the following trial register: www.researchregistry.com (UIN researchregistry993) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12893-016-0194-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5131530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51315302016-12-15 Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy Grass, Fabian Cachemaille, Matthieu Blanc, Catherine Fournier, Nicolas Halkic, Nermin Demartines, Nicolas Hübner, Martin BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the accepted standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of a standardized approach with tailored care maps for pre- and postoperative care by comparing pain, nausea and patient satisfaction after elective and emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: From January 2014 until April 2015, data on pain and nausea management were prospectively recorded for all elective and emergency procedures in the department of visceral surgery. This prospective observational study compared consecutive laparoscopic elective vs. emergency cholecystectomies. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were used to measure pain, nausea, and satisfaction from recovery room until 96 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Final analysis included 168 (79%) elective cholecystectomies and 44 (21%) emergent procedures. Demographics (Age, gender, BMI and ASA-scores) were comparable between the 2 groups. In the emergency group, patients did not receive anxiolytic medication (0% vs.13%, p = 0.009) and less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis (77% vs. 97% p = <0.001). Perioperative pain management was similar in terms of opioid consumption (median amount of fentanyl 450ug [IQR 350-500] vs. 450ug [375-550], p = 0.456) and wound infiltration rates (24% vs. 25%, p = 0.799). Postoperative consumption of paracetamol, metamizole and opiod medications were similar between the 2 groups. VAS scores for pain (p = 0.191) and nausea (p = 0.392) were low for both groups. Patient satisfaction was equally high in both clinical settings (VAS 8.5 ± 1.1 vs. 8.6 ± 1.1, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: A standardized pathway allows equally successful control of pain and nausea after both elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was retrospectively registered by March 01, 2016 in the following trial register: www.researchregistry.com (UIN researchregistry993) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12893-016-0194-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5131530/ /pubmed/27905910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0194-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grass, Fabian
Cachemaille, Matthieu
Blanc, Catherine
Fournier, Nicolas
Halkic, Nermin
Demartines, Nicolas
Hübner, Martin
Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_short Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_sort is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? a case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0194-6
work_keys_str_mv AT grassfabian isstandardizedcarefeasibleintheemergencysettingacasematchedanalysisofpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT cachemaillematthieu isstandardizedcarefeasibleintheemergencysettingacasematchedanalysisofpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT blanccatherine isstandardizedcarefeasibleintheemergencysettingacasematchedanalysisofpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT fourniernicolas isstandardizedcarefeasibleintheemergencysettingacasematchedanalysisofpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT halkicnermin isstandardizedcarefeasibleintheemergencysettingacasematchedanalysisofpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT demartinesnicolas isstandardizedcarefeasibleintheemergencysettingacasematchedanalysisofpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT hubnermartin isstandardizedcarefeasibleintheemergencysettingacasematchedanalysisofpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomy