Cargando…
A methylation PCR method determines FMR1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings
BACKGROUND: Epigenetic modifications of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene locus may impact the risk for reproductive and neurological disorders associated with expanded trinucleotide repeats and methylation status in the 5′ untranslated region. FMR1 methylation is commonly assessed by S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0280-8 |
_version_ | 1782470916459986944 |
---|---|
author | Hadd, Andrew G. Filipovic-Sadic, Stela Zhou, Lili Williams, Arianna Latham, Gary J. Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Hall, Deborah A. |
author_facet | Hadd, Andrew G. Filipovic-Sadic, Stela Zhou, Lili Williams, Arianna Latham, Gary J. Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Hall, Deborah A. |
author_sort | Hadd, Andrew G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epigenetic modifications of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene locus may impact the risk for reproductive and neurological disorders associated with expanded trinucleotide repeats and methylation status in the 5′ untranslated region. FMR1 methylation is commonly assessed by Southern blot (SB) analysis, yet this method suffers a cumbersome workflow and relatively poor sizing resolution especially for premutation allele characteristic for fragile X-associated disorders. In this study, a methylation PCR (mPCR) assay was used to evaluate correlations among genotype, epitype, and phenotype in fragile X premutation (PM) carrier women in order to advance the understanding of the association between molecular determinants and the presence of fragile X-associated tremor and ataxia (FXTAS). RESULTS: Activation ratios (ARs) in 39 PM women were determined by mPCR and compared with SB analysis. ARs were distributed across a range of values including five samples with <20% AR and six with >80% AR. The two methods were correlated (R (2) of 0.87 and F test of <0.001), indicating that mPCR can measure AR in agreement with established assays. However, mPCR was unique in identifying novel and distinct patterns of methylation mosaicism in premutation carrier women, including seven sibling pairs that were assessed using FXTAS clinical rating scales. Of note, four of six pairs with defined age of onset for neurological signs showed ARs consistent with skewed activation of the pathogenic expanded allele. One subject with severe FXTAS had a mosaic full mutation allele identified using mPCR but not detected by SB analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We utilized a repeatable and streamlined methodology to characterize FMR1 inactivation in premutation carrier women. The method was concordant with SB analysis and provided higher resolution information on allele and methylation mosaicism. This approach can facilitate the characterization of epigenetic factors influencing fragile X phenotypes in larger cohort studies that can advance understanding and treatment of fragile X-associated disorders. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0280-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5131543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51315432016-12-15 A methylation PCR method determines FMR1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings Hadd, Andrew G. Filipovic-Sadic, Stela Zhou, Lili Williams, Arianna Latham, Gary J. Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Hall, Deborah A. Clin Epigenetics Short Report BACKGROUND: Epigenetic modifications of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene locus may impact the risk for reproductive and neurological disorders associated with expanded trinucleotide repeats and methylation status in the 5′ untranslated region. FMR1 methylation is commonly assessed by Southern blot (SB) analysis, yet this method suffers a cumbersome workflow and relatively poor sizing resolution especially for premutation allele characteristic for fragile X-associated disorders. In this study, a methylation PCR (mPCR) assay was used to evaluate correlations among genotype, epitype, and phenotype in fragile X premutation (PM) carrier women in order to advance the understanding of the association between molecular determinants and the presence of fragile X-associated tremor and ataxia (FXTAS). RESULTS: Activation ratios (ARs) in 39 PM women were determined by mPCR and compared with SB analysis. ARs were distributed across a range of values including five samples with <20% AR and six with >80% AR. The two methods were correlated (R (2) of 0.87 and F test of <0.001), indicating that mPCR can measure AR in agreement with established assays. However, mPCR was unique in identifying novel and distinct patterns of methylation mosaicism in premutation carrier women, including seven sibling pairs that were assessed using FXTAS clinical rating scales. Of note, four of six pairs with defined age of onset for neurological signs showed ARs consistent with skewed activation of the pathogenic expanded allele. One subject with severe FXTAS had a mosaic full mutation allele identified using mPCR but not detected by SB analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We utilized a repeatable and streamlined methodology to characterize FMR1 inactivation in premutation carrier women. The method was concordant with SB analysis and provided higher resolution information on allele and methylation mosaicism. This approach can facilitate the characterization of epigenetic factors influencing fragile X phenotypes in larger cohort studies that can advance understanding and treatment of fragile X-associated disorders. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0280-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5131543/ /pubmed/27980694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0280-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Hadd, Andrew G. Filipovic-Sadic, Stela Zhou, Lili Williams, Arianna Latham, Gary J. Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth Hall, Deborah A. A methylation PCR method determines FMR1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings |
title | A methylation PCR method determines FMR1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings |
title_full | A methylation PCR method determines FMR1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings |
title_fullStr | A methylation PCR method determines FMR1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings |
title_full_unstemmed | A methylation PCR method determines FMR1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings |
title_short | A methylation PCR method determines FMR1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings |
title_sort | methylation pcr method determines fmr1 activation ratios and differentiates premutation allele mosaicism in carrier siblings |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0280-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haddandrewg amethylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT filipovicsadicstela amethylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT zhoulili amethylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT williamsarianna amethylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT lathamgaryj amethylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT berrykraviselizabeth amethylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT halldeboraha amethylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT haddandrewg methylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT filipovicsadicstela methylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT zhoulili methylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT williamsarianna methylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT lathamgaryj methylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT berrykraviselizabeth methylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings AT halldeboraha methylationpcrmethoddeterminesfmr1activationratiosanddifferentiatespremutationallelemosaicismincarriersiblings |