Cargando…
A current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands
Monoclonal antibodies can bind with high affinity and high selectivity to their targets. As a tool in therapeutics or diagnostics, however, their large size (∼150 kDa) reduces penetration into tissue and prevents passive cellular uptake. To overcome these and other problems, minimized protein scaffo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27352774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip.22900 |
_version_ | 1782470994207703040 |
---|---|
author | Leenheer, Daniël ten Dijke, Peter Hipolito, Christopher John |
author_facet | Leenheer, Daniël ten Dijke, Peter Hipolito, Christopher John |
author_sort | Leenheer, Daniël |
collection | PubMed |
description | Monoclonal antibodies can bind with high affinity and high selectivity to their targets. As a tool in therapeutics or diagnostics, however, their large size (∼150 kDa) reduces penetration into tissue and prevents passive cellular uptake. To overcome these and other problems, minimized protein scaffolds have been chosen or engineered, with care taken to not compromise binding affinity or specificity. An alternate approach is to begin with a minimal non‐antibody scaffold and select functional ligands from a de novo library. We will discuss the structure, production, applications, strengths, and weaknesses of several classes of antibody‐derived ligands, that is, antibodies, intrabodies, and nanobodies, and nonantibody‐derived ligands, that is, monobodies, affibodies, and macrocyclic peptides. In particular, this review is focussed on macrocyclic peptides produced by the Random non‐standard Peptides Integrated Discovery (RaPID) system that are small in size (typically ∼2 kDa), but are able to perform tasks typically handled by larger proteinaceous ligands. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5132055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51320552016-12-02 A current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands Leenheer, Daniël ten Dijke, Peter Hipolito, Christopher John Biopolymers Review Monoclonal antibodies can bind with high affinity and high selectivity to their targets. As a tool in therapeutics or diagnostics, however, their large size (∼150 kDa) reduces penetration into tissue and prevents passive cellular uptake. To overcome these and other problems, minimized protein scaffolds have been chosen or engineered, with care taken to not compromise binding affinity or specificity. An alternate approach is to begin with a minimal non‐antibody scaffold and select functional ligands from a de novo library. We will discuss the structure, production, applications, strengths, and weaknesses of several classes of antibody‐derived ligands, that is, antibodies, intrabodies, and nanobodies, and nonantibody‐derived ligands, that is, monobodies, affibodies, and macrocyclic peptides. In particular, this review is focussed on macrocyclic peptides produced by the Random non‐standard Peptides Integrated Discovery (RaPID) system that are small in size (typically ∼2 kDa), but are able to perform tasks typically handled by larger proteinaceous ligands. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-23 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5132055/ /pubmed/27352774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip.22900 Text en © 2016 The Authors Biopolymers Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Leenheer, Daniël ten Dijke, Peter Hipolito, Christopher John A current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands |
title | A current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands |
title_full | A current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands |
title_fullStr | A current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands |
title_full_unstemmed | A current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands |
title_short | A current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands |
title_sort | current perspective on applications of macrocyclic‐peptide‐based high‐affinity ligands |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27352774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip.22900 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leenheerdaniel acurrentperspectiveonapplicationsofmacrocyclicpeptidebasedhighaffinityligands AT tendijkepeter acurrentperspectiveonapplicationsofmacrocyclicpeptidebasedhighaffinityligands AT hipolitochristopherjohn acurrentperspectiveonapplicationsofmacrocyclicpeptidebasedhighaffinityligands AT leenheerdaniel currentperspectiveonapplicationsofmacrocyclicpeptidebasedhighaffinityligands AT tendijkepeter currentperspectiveonapplicationsofmacrocyclicpeptidebasedhighaffinityligands AT hipolitochristopherjohn currentperspectiveonapplicationsofmacrocyclicpeptidebasedhighaffinityligands |