Cargando…
Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI
Structural and functional connectivity (SC and FC) have received much attention over the last decade, as they offer unique insight into the coordination of brain functioning. They are often assessed independently with three imaging modalities: SC using diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), FC using func...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26503502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22995 |
_version_ | 1782470995400982528 |
---|---|
author | Garcés, Pilar Pereda, Ernesto Hernández‐Tamames, Juan A. Del‐Pozo, Francisco Maestú, Fernando Ángel Pineda‐Pardo, José |
author_facet | Garcés, Pilar Pereda, Ernesto Hernández‐Tamames, Juan A. Del‐Pozo, Francisco Maestú, Fernando Ángel Pineda‐Pardo, José |
author_sort | Garcés, Pilar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Structural and functional connectivity (SC and FC) have received much attention over the last decade, as they offer unique insight into the coordination of brain functioning. They are often assessed independently with three imaging modalities: SC using diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), FC using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography (MEG/EEG). DWI provides information about white matter organization, allowing the reconstruction of fiber bundles. fMRI uses blood‐oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) contrast to indirectly map neuronal activation. MEG and EEG are direct measures of neuronal activity, as they are sensitive to the synchronous inputs in pyramidal neurons. Seminal studies have targeted either the electrophysiological substrate of BOLD or the anatomical basis of FC. However, multimodal comparisons have been scarcely performed, and the relation between SC, fMRI‐FC, and MEG‐FC is still unclear. Here we present a systematic comparison of SC, resting state fMRI‐FC, and MEG‐FC between cortical regions, by evaluating their similarities at three different scales: global network, node, and hub distribution. We obtained strong similarities between the three modalities, especially for the following pairwise combinations: SC and fMRI‐FC; SC and MEG‐FC at theta, alpha, beta and gamma bands; and fMRI‐FC and MEG‐FC in alpha and beta. Furthermore, highest node similarity was found for regions of the default mode network and primary motor cortex, which also presented the highest hubness score. Distance was partially responsible for these similarities since it biased all three connectivity estimates, but not the unique contributor, since similarities remained after controlling for distance. Hum Brain Mapp 37:20–34, 2016. © 2015 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5132061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51320612016-12-02 Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI Garcés, Pilar Pereda, Ernesto Hernández‐Tamames, Juan A. Del‐Pozo, Francisco Maestú, Fernando Ángel Pineda‐Pardo, José Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Structural and functional connectivity (SC and FC) have received much attention over the last decade, as they offer unique insight into the coordination of brain functioning. They are often assessed independently with three imaging modalities: SC using diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), FC using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography (MEG/EEG). DWI provides information about white matter organization, allowing the reconstruction of fiber bundles. fMRI uses blood‐oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) contrast to indirectly map neuronal activation. MEG and EEG are direct measures of neuronal activity, as they are sensitive to the synchronous inputs in pyramidal neurons. Seminal studies have targeted either the electrophysiological substrate of BOLD or the anatomical basis of FC. However, multimodal comparisons have been scarcely performed, and the relation between SC, fMRI‐FC, and MEG‐FC is still unclear. Here we present a systematic comparison of SC, resting state fMRI‐FC, and MEG‐FC between cortical regions, by evaluating their similarities at three different scales: global network, node, and hub distribution. We obtained strong similarities between the three modalities, especially for the following pairwise combinations: SC and fMRI‐FC; SC and MEG‐FC at theta, alpha, beta and gamma bands; and fMRI‐FC and MEG‐FC in alpha and beta. Furthermore, highest node similarity was found for regions of the default mode network and primary motor cortex, which also presented the highest hubness score. Distance was partially responsible for these similarities since it biased all three connectivity estimates, but not the unique contributor, since similarities remained after controlling for distance. Hum Brain Mapp 37:20–34, 2016. © 2015 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5132061/ /pubmed/26503502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22995 Text en © 2015 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Garcés, Pilar Pereda, Ernesto Hernández‐Tamames, Juan A. Del‐Pozo, Francisco Maestú, Fernando Ángel Pineda‐Pardo, José Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI |
title | Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI
|
title_full | Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI
|
title_fullStr | Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI
|
title_full_unstemmed | Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI
|
title_short | Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: A comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI
|
title_sort | multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: a comparison of resting state meg, fmri, and dwi |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26503502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garcespilar multimodaldescriptionofwholebrainconnectivityacomparisonofrestingstatemegfmrianddwi AT peredaernesto multimodaldescriptionofwholebrainconnectivityacomparisonofrestingstatemegfmrianddwi AT hernandeztamamesjuana multimodaldescriptionofwholebrainconnectivityacomparisonofrestingstatemegfmrianddwi AT delpozofrancisco multimodaldescriptionofwholebrainconnectivityacomparisonofrestingstatemegfmrianddwi AT maestufernando multimodaldescriptionofwholebrainconnectivityacomparisonofrestingstatemegfmrianddwi AT angelpinedapardojose multimodaldescriptionofwholebrainconnectivityacomparisonofrestingstatemegfmrianddwi |