Cargando…

Perceptual interaction of local motion signals

Motion signals are a rich source of information used in many everyday tasks, such as segregation of objects from background and navigation. Motion analysis by biological systems is generally considered to consist of two stages: extraction of local motion signals followed by spatial integration. Stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nitzany, Eyal I., Loe, Maren E., Palmer, Stephanie E., Victor, Jonathan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27902829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/16.14.22
_version_ 1782470999478894592
author Nitzany, Eyal I.
Loe, Maren E.
Palmer, Stephanie E.
Victor, Jonathan D.
author_facet Nitzany, Eyal I.
Loe, Maren E.
Palmer, Stephanie E.
Victor, Jonathan D.
author_sort Nitzany, Eyal I.
collection PubMed
description Motion signals are a rich source of information used in many everyday tasks, such as segregation of objects from background and navigation. Motion analysis by biological systems is generally considered to consist of two stages: extraction of local motion signals followed by spatial integration. Studies using synthetic stimuli show that there are many kinds and subtypes of local motion signals. When presented in isolation, these stimuli elicit behavioral and neurophysiological responses in a wide range of species, from insects to mammals. However, these mathematically-distinct varieties of local motion signals typically co-exist in natural scenes. This study focuses on interactions between two kinds of local motion signals: Fourier and glider. Fourier signals are typically associated with translation, while glider signals occur when an object approaches or recedes. Here, using a novel class of synthetic stimuli, we ask how distinct kinds of local motion signals interact and whether context influences sensitivity to Fourier motion. We report that local motion signals of different types interact at the perceptual level, and that this interaction can include subthreshold summation and, in some subjects, subtle context-dependent changes in sensitivity. We discuss the implications of these observations, and the factors that may underlie them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5132080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51320802016-12-02 Perceptual interaction of local motion signals Nitzany, Eyal I. Loe, Maren E. Palmer, Stephanie E. Victor, Jonathan D. J Vis Article Motion signals are a rich source of information used in many everyday tasks, such as segregation of objects from background and navigation. Motion analysis by biological systems is generally considered to consist of two stages: extraction of local motion signals followed by spatial integration. Studies using synthetic stimuli show that there are many kinds and subtypes of local motion signals. When presented in isolation, these stimuli elicit behavioral and neurophysiological responses in a wide range of species, from insects to mammals. However, these mathematically-distinct varieties of local motion signals typically co-exist in natural scenes. This study focuses on interactions between two kinds of local motion signals: Fourier and glider. Fourier signals are typically associated with translation, while glider signals occur when an object approaches or recedes. Here, using a novel class of synthetic stimuli, we ask how distinct kinds of local motion signals interact and whether context influences sensitivity to Fourier motion. We report that local motion signals of different types interact at the perceptual level, and that this interaction can include subthreshold summation and, in some subjects, subtle context-dependent changes in sensitivity. We discuss the implications of these observations, and the factors that may underlie them. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5132080/ /pubmed/27902829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/16.14.22 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Nitzany, Eyal I.
Loe, Maren E.
Palmer, Stephanie E.
Victor, Jonathan D.
Perceptual interaction of local motion signals
title Perceptual interaction of local motion signals
title_full Perceptual interaction of local motion signals
title_fullStr Perceptual interaction of local motion signals
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual interaction of local motion signals
title_short Perceptual interaction of local motion signals
title_sort perceptual interaction of local motion signals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27902829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/16.14.22
work_keys_str_mv AT nitzanyeyali perceptualinteractionoflocalmotionsignals
AT loemarene perceptualinteractionoflocalmotionsignals
AT palmerstephaniee perceptualinteractionoflocalmotionsignals
AT victorjonathand perceptualinteractionoflocalmotionsignals