Cargando…

Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Red blood cells (RBCs) may be stored up to 42 days before transfusion, per US and EU standards. Although there is ample evidence that RBCs undergo deleterious changes during storage, studies assessing outcomes relative to storage time report conflicting findings. This st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Roback, J. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12441
_version_ 1782471008701120512
author Roback, J. D.
author_facet Roback, J. D.
author_sort Roback, J. D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Red blood cells (RBCs) may be stored up to 42 days before transfusion, per US and EU standards. Although there is ample evidence that RBCs undergo deleterious changes during storage, studies assessing outcomes relative to storage time report conflicting findings. This study investigated RBC storage duration perspectives and practices among blood banking and transfusion professionals. MATERIALS & METHODS: A survey was administered at the American Association of Blood Banking annual meeting in October 2014 (N = 69). RESULTS: On average, participants believed RBC storage should not exceed 34 days (median: 35; range: 1–52), and estimated that RBCs are typically stored 21 days before transfusion at their institutions (median: 20; range: 10–40). There was 97% agreement that minimizing/reversing changes during RBC storage may produce clinical benefits; however, 80% believed the research does not consistently demonstrate worse outcomes using older blood. Two‐thirds agreed that RBC storage duration is a major concern, but 81% agreed most institutions are not pursuing measures to shorten storage. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that many transfusion professionals believe RBCs should be stored for fewer than the 42 days currently allowed and that further efforts are warranted to abrogate changes in stored RBCs. These findings suggest a need for increased awareness of potential consequences of extended RBC storage and for strategies to maximize transfusion benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5132125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51321252016-12-02 Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes Roback, J. D. Vox Sang Blood Component Collection and Production BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Red blood cells (RBCs) may be stored up to 42 days before transfusion, per US and EU standards. Although there is ample evidence that RBCs undergo deleterious changes during storage, studies assessing outcomes relative to storage time report conflicting findings. This study investigated RBC storage duration perspectives and practices among blood banking and transfusion professionals. MATERIALS & METHODS: A survey was administered at the American Association of Blood Banking annual meeting in October 2014 (N = 69). RESULTS: On average, participants believed RBC storage should not exceed 34 days (median: 35; range: 1–52), and estimated that RBCs are typically stored 21 days before transfusion at their institutions (median: 20; range: 10–40). There was 97% agreement that minimizing/reversing changes during RBC storage may produce clinical benefits; however, 80% believed the research does not consistently demonstrate worse outcomes using older blood. Two‐thirds agreed that RBC storage duration is a major concern, but 81% agreed most institutions are not pursuing measures to shorten storage. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that many transfusion professionals believe RBCs should be stored for fewer than the 42 days currently allowed and that further efforts are warranted to abrogate changes in stored RBCs. These findings suggest a need for increased awareness of potential consequences of extended RBC storage and for strategies to maximize transfusion benefits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-23 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5132125/ /pubmed/27552072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12441 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Vox Sanguinis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Blood Transfusion. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Blood Component Collection and Production
Roback, J. D.
Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes
title Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes
title_full Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes
title_fullStr Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes
title_short Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes
title_sort perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes
topic Blood Component Collection and Production
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12441
work_keys_str_mv AT robackjd perspectivesontheimpactofstoragedurationonbloodqualityandtransfusionoutcomes