Cargando…
Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Red blood cells (RBCs) may be stored up to 42 days before transfusion, per US and EU standards. Although there is ample evidence that RBCs undergo deleterious changes during storage, studies assessing outcomes relative to storage time report conflicting findings. This st...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12441 |
_version_ | 1782471008701120512 |
---|---|
author | Roback, J. D. |
author_facet | Roback, J. D. |
author_sort | Roback, J. D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Red blood cells (RBCs) may be stored up to 42 days before transfusion, per US and EU standards. Although there is ample evidence that RBCs undergo deleterious changes during storage, studies assessing outcomes relative to storage time report conflicting findings. This study investigated RBC storage duration perspectives and practices among blood banking and transfusion professionals. MATERIALS & METHODS: A survey was administered at the American Association of Blood Banking annual meeting in October 2014 (N = 69). RESULTS: On average, participants believed RBC storage should not exceed 34 days (median: 35; range: 1–52), and estimated that RBCs are typically stored 21 days before transfusion at their institutions (median: 20; range: 10–40). There was 97% agreement that minimizing/reversing changes during RBC storage may produce clinical benefits; however, 80% believed the research does not consistently demonstrate worse outcomes using older blood. Two‐thirds agreed that RBC storage duration is a major concern, but 81% agreed most institutions are not pursuing measures to shorten storage. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that many transfusion professionals believe RBCs should be stored for fewer than the 42 days currently allowed and that further efforts are warranted to abrogate changes in stored RBCs. These findings suggest a need for increased awareness of potential consequences of extended RBC storage and for strategies to maximize transfusion benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5132125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51321252016-12-02 Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes Roback, J. D. Vox Sang Blood Component Collection and Production BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Red blood cells (RBCs) may be stored up to 42 days before transfusion, per US and EU standards. Although there is ample evidence that RBCs undergo deleterious changes during storage, studies assessing outcomes relative to storage time report conflicting findings. This study investigated RBC storage duration perspectives and practices among blood banking and transfusion professionals. MATERIALS & METHODS: A survey was administered at the American Association of Blood Banking annual meeting in October 2014 (N = 69). RESULTS: On average, participants believed RBC storage should not exceed 34 days (median: 35; range: 1–52), and estimated that RBCs are typically stored 21 days before transfusion at their institutions (median: 20; range: 10–40). There was 97% agreement that minimizing/reversing changes during RBC storage may produce clinical benefits; however, 80% believed the research does not consistently demonstrate worse outcomes using older blood. Two‐thirds agreed that RBC storage duration is a major concern, but 81% agreed most institutions are not pursuing measures to shorten storage. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that many transfusion professionals believe RBCs should be stored for fewer than the 42 days currently allowed and that further efforts are warranted to abrogate changes in stored RBCs. These findings suggest a need for increased awareness of potential consequences of extended RBC storage and for strategies to maximize transfusion benefits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-23 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5132125/ /pubmed/27552072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12441 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Vox Sanguinis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Blood Transfusion. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Blood Component Collection and Production Roback, J. D. Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes |
title | Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes |
title_full | Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes |
title_fullStr | Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes |
title_short | Perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes |
title_sort | perspectives on the impact of storage duration on blood quality and transfusion outcomes |
topic | Blood Component Collection and Production |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.12441 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robackjd perspectivesontheimpactofstoragedurationonbloodqualityandtransfusionoutcomes |