Cargando…

Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle factors and genetic information has been found to contribute to the occurrence of lung cancer. This study assessed receptivity to participating in lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk among unaffected lung cancer family members. We also explored demographic, medical, and ps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howell, Lisa A, Brockman, Tabetha A, Sinicrope, Pamela S, Patten, Christi A, Decker, Paul A, Busta, Allan, Stoddard, Shawn, McNallan, Sheila R, Yang, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917414
_version_ 1782471020689489920
author Howell, Lisa A
Brockman, Tabetha A
Sinicrope, Pamela S
Patten, Christi A
Decker, Paul A
Busta, Allan
Stoddard, Shawn
McNallan, Sheila R
Yang, Ping
author_facet Howell, Lisa A
Brockman, Tabetha A
Sinicrope, Pamela S
Patten, Christi A
Decker, Paul A
Busta, Allan
Stoddard, Shawn
McNallan, Sheila R
Yang, Ping
author_sort Howell, Lisa A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lifestyle factors and genetic information has been found to contribute to the occurrence of lung cancer. This study assessed receptivity to participating in lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk among unaffected lung cancer family members. We also explored demographic, medical, and psychosocial correlates of willingness to participate in lifestyle programs. METHODS: Family members who are part of a lung Cancer Family Registry were asked to fill out a survey assessing their receptivity to cancer risk reduction programs including preferences for an individual or family-based program. RESULTS: Of the 583 respondents, 85% were “Somewhat” or “Definitely” willing to participate in a lifestyle program. Among those receptive, about half (56%) preferred a family-based approach. Preferred programs included weight management (36%) and nutritional information (30%). Preferred delivery channels were Internet (45%) and mail-based (29%) programs. On multivariate analysis, those definitely/somewhat receptive reported greater exercise self-efficacy scores (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: The majority of the sample was receptive to lifestyle programs that might decrease cancer risk. There was a large preference for family-based weight management and nutritional programs. Further research is indicated to determine how to best incorporate a family-based approach to lifestyle programs for cancer family members.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5132181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51321812017-03-01 Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members Howell, Lisa A Brockman, Tabetha A Sinicrope, Pamela S Patten, Christi A Decker, Paul A Busta, Allan Stoddard, Shawn McNallan, Sheila R Yang, Ping Adv Cancer Prev Article BACKGROUND: Lifestyle factors and genetic information has been found to contribute to the occurrence of lung cancer. This study assessed receptivity to participating in lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk among unaffected lung cancer family members. We also explored demographic, medical, and psychosocial correlates of willingness to participate in lifestyle programs. METHODS: Family members who are part of a lung Cancer Family Registry were asked to fill out a survey assessing their receptivity to cancer risk reduction programs including preferences for an individual or family-based program. RESULTS: Of the 583 respondents, 85% were “Somewhat” or “Definitely” willing to participate in a lifestyle program. Among those receptive, about half (56%) preferred a family-based approach. Preferred programs included weight management (36%) and nutritional information (30%). Preferred delivery channels were Internet (45%) and mail-based (29%) programs. On multivariate analysis, those definitely/somewhat receptive reported greater exercise self-efficacy scores (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: The majority of the sample was receptive to lifestyle programs that might decrease cancer risk. There was a large preference for family-based weight management and nutritional programs. Further research is indicated to determine how to best incorporate a family-based approach to lifestyle programs for cancer family members. 2016-06-20 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5132181/ /pubmed/27917414 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Howell, Lisa A
Brockman, Tabetha A
Sinicrope, Pamela S
Patten, Christi A
Decker, Paul A
Busta, Allan
Stoddard, Shawn
McNallan, Sheila R
Yang, Ping
Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members
title Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members
title_full Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members
title_fullStr Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members
title_full_unstemmed Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members
title_short Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members
title_sort receptivity and preferences for lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk among lung cancer family members
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917414
work_keys_str_mv AT howelllisaa receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers
AT brockmantabethaa receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers
AT sinicropepamelas receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers
AT pattenchristia receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers
AT deckerpaula receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers
AT bustaallan receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers
AT stoddardshawn receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers
AT mcnallansheilar receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers
AT yangping receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers