Cargando…
Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle factors and genetic information has been found to contribute to the occurrence of lung cancer. This study assessed receptivity to participating in lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk among unaffected lung cancer family members. We also explored demographic, medical, and ps...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917414 |
_version_ | 1782471020689489920 |
---|---|
author | Howell, Lisa A Brockman, Tabetha A Sinicrope, Pamela S Patten, Christi A Decker, Paul A Busta, Allan Stoddard, Shawn McNallan, Sheila R Yang, Ping |
author_facet | Howell, Lisa A Brockman, Tabetha A Sinicrope, Pamela S Patten, Christi A Decker, Paul A Busta, Allan Stoddard, Shawn McNallan, Sheila R Yang, Ping |
author_sort | Howell, Lisa A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lifestyle factors and genetic information has been found to contribute to the occurrence of lung cancer. This study assessed receptivity to participating in lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk among unaffected lung cancer family members. We also explored demographic, medical, and psychosocial correlates of willingness to participate in lifestyle programs. METHODS: Family members who are part of a lung Cancer Family Registry were asked to fill out a survey assessing their receptivity to cancer risk reduction programs including preferences for an individual or family-based program. RESULTS: Of the 583 respondents, 85% were “Somewhat” or “Definitely” willing to participate in a lifestyle program. Among those receptive, about half (56%) preferred a family-based approach. Preferred programs included weight management (36%) and nutritional information (30%). Preferred delivery channels were Internet (45%) and mail-based (29%) programs. On multivariate analysis, those definitely/somewhat receptive reported greater exercise self-efficacy scores (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: The majority of the sample was receptive to lifestyle programs that might decrease cancer risk. There was a large preference for family-based weight management and nutritional programs. Further research is indicated to determine how to best incorporate a family-based approach to lifestyle programs for cancer family members. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5132181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51321812017-03-01 Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members Howell, Lisa A Brockman, Tabetha A Sinicrope, Pamela S Patten, Christi A Decker, Paul A Busta, Allan Stoddard, Shawn McNallan, Sheila R Yang, Ping Adv Cancer Prev Article BACKGROUND: Lifestyle factors and genetic information has been found to contribute to the occurrence of lung cancer. This study assessed receptivity to participating in lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk among unaffected lung cancer family members. We also explored demographic, medical, and psychosocial correlates of willingness to participate in lifestyle programs. METHODS: Family members who are part of a lung Cancer Family Registry were asked to fill out a survey assessing their receptivity to cancer risk reduction programs including preferences for an individual or family-based program. RESULTS: Of the 583 respondents, 85% were “Somewhat” or “Definitely” willing to participate in a lifestyle program. Among those receptive, about half (56%) preferred a family-based approach. Preferred programs included weight management (36%) and nutritional information (30%). Preferred delivery channels were Internet (45%) and mail-based (29%) programs. On multivariate analysis, those definitely/somewhat receptive reported greater exercise self-efficacy scores (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: The majority of the sample was receptive to lifestyle programs that might decrease cancer risk. There was a large preference for family-based weight management and nutritional programs. Further research is indicated to determine how to best incorporate a family-based approach to lifestyle programs for cancer family members. 2016-06-20 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5132181/ /pubmed/27917414 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Howell, Lisa A Brockman, Tabetha A Sinicrope, Pamela S Patten, Christi A Decker, Paul A Busta, Allan Stoddard, Shawn McNallan, Sheila R Yang, Ping Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members |
title | Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members |
title_full | Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members |
title_fullStr | Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members |
title_full_unstemmed | Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members |
title_short | Receptivity and Preferences for Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Cancer Risk among Lung Cancer Family Members |
title_sort | receptivity and preferences for lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk among lung cancer family members |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917414 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT howelllisaa receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers AT brockmantabethaa receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers AT sinicropepamelas receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers AT pattenchristia receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers AT deckerpaula receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers AT bustaallan receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers AT stoddardshawn receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers AT mcnallansheilar receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers AT yangping receptivityandpreferencesforlifestyleprogramstoreducecancerriskamonglungcancerfamilymembers |