Cargando…

Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version

Emerging and changing evidence made it necessary to update STOPP-START criteria, and version 2 was published recently. In this study the objectives were to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing (PIM) in primary care using STOPP versions 1 (v1) and 2 (v2), as we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanco-Reina, Encarnación, García-Merino, Maria Rosa, Ocaña-Riola, Ricardo, Aguilar-Cano, Lorena, Valdellós, Jennifer, Bellido-Estévez, Inmaculada, Ariza-Zafra, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27907210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167586
_version_ 1782471044625334272
author Blanco-Reina, Encarnación
García-Merino, Maria Rosa
Ocaña-Riola, Ricardo
Aguilar-Cano, Lorena
Valdellós, Jennifer
Bellido-Estévez, Inmaculada
Ariza-Zafra, Gabriel
author_facet Blanco-Reina, Encarnación
García-Merino, Maria Rosa
Ocaña-Riola, Ricardo
Aguilar-Cano, Lorena
Valdellós, Jennifer
Bellido-Estévez, Inmaculada
Ariza-Zafra, Gabriel
author_sort Blanco-Reina, Encarnación
collection PubMed
description Emerging and changing evidence made it necessary to update STOPP-START criteria, and version 2 was published recently. In this study the objectives were to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing (PIM) in primary care using STOPP versions 1 (v1) and 2 (v2), as well as 2012 AGS Beers criteria, and analyze the factors associated with inappropriate prescribing according to STOPP/START v2. A cross-sectional study was carried out including community-dwelling older adults over the age of 65. Sociodemographic, clinical, functional and comprehensive drug therapy data were collected. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients receiving at least one PIM. This variable was measured using three tools: STOPP v1, 2012 AGS Beers criteria and STOPP v2. Similarly, the percentage of patients receiving at least one potential prescribing omission (PPO) was calculated using START versions 1 and 2. A total of 1,615 prescriptions were reviewed. The median number of medications per patient was 7.1 drugs (±3.8). The prevalence of elderly people exposed to polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was 72.9%, whereas 28.4% of the participants took ≥10 drugs regularly. PIM were present in 18.7%, 37.3% and 40.4% of participants, according to the STOPP v1, 2012 Beers criteria and STOPP v2, respectively. According to STOPP v2, the number of medications taken (OR: 1.14, 1.06–1.25), the presence of a psychological disorder (OR: 2.22, 1.13–4.37) and insomnia (OR: 3.35, 1.80–6.32) were risk factors for taking a PIM. The prevalence of PPOs was 34.7% and 21.8% according to version 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, STOPP-START criteria have been remarkably modified, which is evidenced by the different prevalence rates detected using version 2, as compared to version 1. In fact, the level of agreement between version 1 and the updated version is only moderate. Special attention should be paid on benzodiazepines, which keep being the most frequent PIM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5132290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51322902016-12-21 Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version Blanco-Reina, Encarnación García-Merino, Maria Rosa Ocaña-Riola, Ricardo Aguilar-Cano, Lorena Valdellós, Jennifer Bellido-Estévez, Inmaculada Ariza-Zafra, Gabriel PLoS One Research Article Emerging and changing evidence made it necessary to update STOPP-START criteria, and version 2 was published recently. In this study the objectives were to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing (PIM) in primary care using STOPP versions 1 (v1) and 2 (v2), as well as 2012 AGS Beers criteria, and analyze the factors associated with inappropriate prescribing according to STOPP/START v2. A cross-sectional study was carried out including community-dwelling older adults over the age of 65. Sociodemographic, clinical, functional and comprehensive drug therapy data were collected. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients receiving at least one PIM. This variable was measured using three tools: STOPP v1, 2012 AGS Beers criteria and STOPP v2. Similarly, the percentage of patients receiving at least one potential prescribing omission (PPO) was calculated using START versions 1 and 2. A total of 1,615 prescriptions were reviewed. The median number of medications per patient was 7.1 drugs (±3.8). The prevalence of elderly people exposed to polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was 72.9%, whereas 28.4% of the participants took ≥10 drugs regularly. PIM were present in 18.7%, 37.3% and 40.4% of participants, according to the STOPP v1, 2012 Beers criteria and STOPP v2, respectively. According to STOPP v2, the number of medications taken (OR: 1.14, 1.06–1.25), the presence of a psychological disorder (OR: 2.22, 1.13–4.37) and insomnia (OR: 3.35, 1.80–6.32) were risk factors for taking a PIM. The prevalence of PPOs was 34.7% and 21.8% according to version 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, STOPP-START criteria have been remarkably modified, which is evidenced by the different prevalence rates detected using version 2, as compared to version 1. In fact, the level of agreement between version 1 and the updated version is only moderate. Special attention should be paid on benzodiazepines, which keep being the most frequent PIM. Public Library of Science 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5132290/ /pubmed/27907210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167586 Text en © 2016 Blanco-Reina et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blanco-Reina, Encarnación
García-Merino, Maria Rosa
Ocaña-Riola, Ricardo
Aguilar-Cano, Lorena
Valdellós, Jennifer
Bellido-Estévez, Inmaculada
Ariza-Zafra, Gabriel
Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version
title Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version
title_full Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version
title_fullStr Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version
title_short Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version
title_sort assessing potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older patients using the updated version of stopp-start criteria: a comparison of profiles and prevalences with respect to the original version
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27907210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167586
work_keys_str_mv AT blancoreinaencarnacion assessingpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingincommunitydwellingolderpatientsusingtheupdatedversionofstoppstartcriteriaacomparisonofprofilesandprevalenceswithrespecttotheoriginalversion
AT garciamerinomariarosa assessingpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingincommunitydwellingolderpatientsusingtheupdatedversionofstoppstartcriteriaacomparisonofprofilesandprevalenceswithrespecttotheoriginalversion
AT ocanariolaricardo assessingpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingincommunitydwellingolderpatientsusingtheupdatedversionofstoppstartcriteriaacomparisonofprofilesandprevalenceswithrespecttotheoriginalversion
AT aguilarcanolorena assessingpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingincommunitydwellingolderpatientsusingtheupdatedversionofstoppstartcriteriaacomparisonofprofilesandprevalenceswithrespecttotheoriginalversion
AT valdellosjennifer assessingpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingincommunitydwellingolderpatientsusingtheupdatedversionofstoppstartcriteriaacomparisonofprofilesandprevalenceswithrespecttotheoriginalversion
AT bellidoestevezinmaculada assessingpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingincommunitydwellingolderpatientsusingtheupdatedversionofstoppstartcriteriaacomparisonofprofilesandprevalenceswithrespecttotheoriginalversion
AT arizazafragabriel assessingpotentiallyinappropriateprescribingincommunitydwellingolderpatientsusingtheupdatedversionofstoppstartcriteriaacomparisonofprofilesandprevalenceswithrespecttotheoriginalversion