Cargando…

Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a pre-malignant lesion, potentially leading to vaginal cancer. It is a rare disease, representing less than 1% of all intraepithelial neoplasia of the female genital tract. Similar to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), there are three...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamos, Cristina, Mihaljevic, Charlotte, Aulmann, Sebastian, Bruckner, Thomas, Domschke, Christoph, Wallwiener, Markus, Paringer, Carmen, Fluhr, Herbert, Schott, Sarah, Dinkic, Christine, Brucker, Janina, Golatta, Michael, Gensthaler, Lisa, Eichbaum, Michael, Sohn, Christof, Rom, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27907089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167386
_version_ 1782471044868603904
author Lamos, Cristina
Mihaljevic, Charlotte
Aulmann, Sebastian
Bruckner, Thomas
Domschke, Christoph
Wallwiener, Markus
Paringer, Carmen
Fluhr, Herbert
Schott, Sarah
Dinkic, Christine
Brucker, Janina
Golatta, Michael
Gensthaler, Lisa
Eichbaum, Michael
Sohn, Christof
Rom, Joachim
author_facet Lamos, Cristina
Mihaljevic, Charlotte
Aulmann, Sebastian
Bruckner, Thomas
Domschke, Christoph
Wallwiener, Markus
Paringer, Carmen
Fluhr, Herbert
Schott, Sarah
Dinkic, Christine
Brucker, Janina
Golatta, Michael
Gensthaler, Lisa
Eichbaum, Michael
Sohn, Christof
Rom, Joachim
author_sort Lamos, Cristina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a pre-malignant lesion, potentially leading to vaginal cancer. It is a rare disease, representing less than 1% of all intraepithelial neoplasia of the female genital tract. Similar to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), there are three different grades of VAIN. VAIN 1 is also known as a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), whereas VAIN 2 and VAIN 3 both represent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Risk factors for the development of VAIN are similar to those for cervical neoplasia, i.e. promiscuity, starting sexual activity at an early age, tobacco consumption and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). However, compared to other intraepithelial neoplasia such as CIN or VIN (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia), there still is little understanding about the natural course of VAIN and its capacity for pro- or regression. Furthermore, there is controversial data about the HPV detection rate in VAIN lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 67 patients with histologically confirmed VAIN, who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 at the University Women´s Hospital of Heidelberg Germany, were included in this study. The biopsies of all participating patients were subjected to HPV genotyping. GP-E6/E7 Nested Multiplex PCR (NMPCR) was used to identify and genotype HPV. Eighteen pairs of type-specific nested PCR primers were assessed to detect the following "high-risk" HPV genotypes: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68, as well as the "low-risk" genotypes 6/11, 42, 43 and 44. The data was analyzed with the software SAS (Statistical Analysis System). RESULTS: All 67 cases were eligible for DNA analysis. The median age was 53 years. The largest group with 53% (n = 36) was formed by women, who were first diagnosed with VAIN between the age of 41 to 60 years. 50% (n = 37) of the patients presented a VAIN in the upper 1/3 of the vagina. 58 (87%) were diagnosed with HSIL (VAIN). The median age in patients with LSIL (VAIN) was 53 years and in patients with HSIL (VAIN) 53.5 years. 12 women (18%) had an immunosuppression. HPV positivity was confirmed in 37 patients (55%). Except for a single patient, who had a triple infection with HPV types 6/11, 16 and 68, only infections with one single HPV genotype were detected. An infection with the HPV genotypes 31, 39, 45, 51, 58, 59, 66, 42, 43 and 44 couldn’t be found in any of the patients. In 28 patients with diagnosed VAIN, an infection with HPV 16 could be shown, 24 (86%) of them were diagnosed with a HSIL (VAIN). 16 (24%) women presented condylomata and 13 of them (81%) had a positive HPV status. However, only 47% of the women without condylomata presented a positive HPV status, resulting in a significant correlation (p = 0.0164) between condylomata and HPV infection. In 28 of all 67 patients (42%), recurrence of the neoplasia occurred. CONCLUSION: HPV 16 is the main virus-type to be associated with the development of a VAIN. Also, HPV 16 infection, VIN or condylomata acuminata in the past medical history seemed to be significant factors for early relapse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5132291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51322912016-12-21 Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia Lamos, Cristina Mihaljevic, Charlotte Aulmann, Sebastian Bruckner, Thomas Domschke, Christoph Wallwiener, Markus Paringer, Carmen Fluhr, Herbert Schott, Sarah Dinkic, Christine Brucker, Janina Golatta, Michael Gensthaler, Lisa Eichbaum, Michael Sohn, Christof Rom, Joachim PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a pre-malignant lesion, potentially leading to vaginal cancer. It is a rare disease, representing less than 1% of all intraepithelial neoplasia of the female genital tract. Similar to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), there are three different grades of VAIN. VAIN 1 is also known as a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), whereas VAIN 2 and VAIN 3 both represent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Risk factors for the development of VAIN are similar to those for cervical neoplasia, i.e. promiscuity, starting sexual activity at an early age, tobacco consumption and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). However, compared to other intraepithelial neoplasia such as CIN or VIN (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia), there still is little understanding about the natural course of VAIN and its capacity for pro- or regression. Furthermore, there is controversial data about the HPV detection rate in VAIN lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 67 patients with histologically confirmed VAIN, who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 at the University Women´s Hospital of Heidelberg Germany, were included in this study. The biopsies of all participating patients were subjected to HPV genotyping. GP-E6/E7 Nested Multiplex PCR (NMPCR) was used to identify and genotype HPV. Eighteen pairs of type-specific nested PCR primers were assessed to detect the following "high-risk" HPV genotypes: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68, as well as the "low-risk" genotypes 6/11, 42, 43 and 44. The data was analyzed with the software SAS (Statistical Analysis System). RESULTS: All 67 cases were eligible for DNA analysis. The median age was 53 years. The largest group with 53% (n = 36) was formed by women, who were first diagnosed with VAIN between the age of 41 to 60 years. 50% (n = 37) of the patients presented a VAIN in the upper 1/3 of the vagina. 58 (87%) were diagnosed with HSIL (VAIN). The median age in patients with LSIL (VAIN) was 53 years and in patients with HSIL (VAIN) 53.5 years. 12 women (18%) had an immunosuppression. HPV positivity was confirmed in 37 patients (55%). Except for a single patient, who had a triple infection with HPV types 6/11, 16 and 68, only infections with one single HPV genotype were detected. An infection with the HPV genotypes 31, 39, 45, 51, 58, 59, 66, 42, 43 and 44 couldn’t be found in any of the patients. In 28 patients with diagnosed VAIN, an infection with HPV 16 could be shown, 24 (86%) of them were diagnosed with a HSIL (VAIN). 16 (24%) women presented condylomata and 13 of them (81%) had a positive HPV status. However, only 47% of the women without condylomata presented a positive HPV status, resulting in a significant correlation (p = 0.0164) between condylomata and HPV infection. In 28 of all 67 patients (42%), recurrence of the neoplasia occurred. CONCLUSION: HPV 16 is the main virus-type to be associated with the development of a VAIN. Also, HPV 16 infection, VIN or condylomata acuminata in the past medical history seemed to be significant factors for early relapse. Public Library of Science 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5132291/ /pubmed/27907089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167386 Text en © 2016 Lamos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lamos, Cristina
Mihaljevic, Charlotte
Aulmann, Sebastian
Bruckner, Thomas
Domschke, Christoph
Wallwiener, Markus
Paringer, Carmen
Fluhr, Herbert
Schott, Sarah
Dinkic, Christine
Brucker, Janina
Golatta, Michael
Gensthaler, Lisa
Eichbaum, Michael
Sohn, Christof
Rom, Joachim
Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_full Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_fullStr Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_short Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
title_sort detection of human papillomavirus infection in patients with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27907089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167386
work_keys_str_mv AT lamoscristina detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT mihaljeviccharlotte detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT aulmannsebastian detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT brucknerthomas detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT domschkechristoph detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT wallwienermarkus detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT paringercarmen detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT fluhrherbert detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT schottsarah detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT dinkicchristine detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT bruckerjanina detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT golattamichael detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT gensthalerlisa detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT eichbaummichael detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT sohnchristof detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT romjoachim detectionofhumanpapillomavirusinfectioninpatientswithvaginalintraepithelialneoplasia