Cargando…

The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types

The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, assess life sciences departments’ progress toward implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. This paper reports on the development of the rubrics, their validation, and their reliability in measuring departmental change align...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta, Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela, Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy, Aguirre, Karen, Awong-Taylor, Judy, Balser, Teri, Cahill, Michael J., Frey, Regina F., Jack, Thomas, Kelrick, Michael, Marley, Kate, Miller, Kathryn G., Osgood, Marcy, Romano, Sandra, Uzman, J. Akif, Zhao, Jiuqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0260
_version_ 1782471059233046528
author Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta
Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela
Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy
Aguirre, Karen
Awong-Taylor, Judy
Balser, Teri
Cahill, Michael J.
Frey, Regina F.
Jack, Thomas
Kelrick, Michael
Marley, Kate
Miller, Kathryn G.
Osgood, Marcy
Romano, Sandra
Uzman, J. Akif
Zhao, Jiuqing
author_facet Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta
Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela
Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy
Aguirre, Karen
Awong-Taylor, Judy
Balser, Teri
Cahill, Michael J.
Frey, Regina F.
Jack, Thomas
Kelrick, Michael
Marley, Kate
Miller, Kathryn G.
Osgood, Marcy
Romano, Sandra
Uzman, J. Akif
Zhao, Jiuqing
author_sort Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta
collection PubMed
description The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, assess life sciences departments’ progress toward implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. This paper reports on the development of the rubrics, their validation, and their reliability in measuring departmental change aligned with the Vision and Change recommendations. The rubrics assess 66 different criteria across five areas: Curriculum Alignment, Assessment, Faculty Practice/Faculty Support, Infrastructure, and Climate for Change. The results from this work demonstrate the rubrics can be used to evaluate departmental transformation equitably across institution types and represent baseline data about the adoption of the Vision and Change recommendations by life sciences programs across the United States. While all institution types have made progress, liberal arts institutions are farther along in implementing these recommendations. Generally, institutions earned the highest scores on the Curriculum Alignment rubric and the lowest scores on the Assessment rubric. The results of this study clearly indicate that the Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, are valid and equitable and can track long-term progress of the transformation of life sciences departments. In addition, four of the five rubrics have broad applicability and can be used to evaluate departmental transformation by other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5132357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51323572016-12-06 The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy Aguirre, Karen Awong-Taylor, Judy Balser, Teri Cahill, Michael J. Frey, Regina F. Jack, Thomas Kelrick, Michael Marley, Kate Miller, Kathryn G. Osgood, Marcy Romano, Sandra Uzman, J. Akif Zhao, Jiuqing CBE Life Sci Educ Article The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, assess life sciences departments’ progress toward implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. This paper reports on the development of the rubrics, their validation, and their reliability in measuring departmental change aligned with the Vision and Change recommendations. The rubrics assess 66 different criteria across five areas: Curriculum Alignment, Assessment, Faculty Practice/Faculty Support, Infrastructure, and Climate for Change. The results from this work demonstrate the rubrics can be used to evaluate departmental transformation equitably across institution types and represent baseline data about the adoption of the Vision and Change recommendations by life sciences programs across the United States. While all institution types have made progress, liberal arts institutions are farther along in implementing these recommendations. Generally, institutions earned the highest scores on the Curriculum Alignment rubric and the lowest scores on the Assessment rubric. The results of this study clearly indicate that the Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, are valid and equitable and can track long-term progress of the transformation of life sciences departments. In addition, four of the five rubrics have broad applicability and can be used to evaluate departmental transformation by other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. American Society for Cell Biology 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5132357/ /pubmed/27856548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0260 Text en © 2016 L. Brancaccio-Taras et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.
spellingShingle Article
Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta
Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela
Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy
Aguirre, Karen
Awong-Taylor, Judy
Balser, Teri
Cahill, Michael J.
Frey, Regina F.
Jack, Thomas
Kelrick, Michael
Marley, Kate
Miller, Kathryn G.
Osgood, Marcy
Romano, Sandra
Uzman, J. Akif
Zhao, Jiuqing
The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types
title The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types
title_full The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types
title_fullStr The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types
title_full_unstemmed The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types
title_short The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types
title_sort pulse vision & change rubrics, version 1.0: a valid and equitable tool to measure transformation of life sciences departments at all institution types
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0260
work_keys_str_mv AT brancacciotarasloretta thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT papelindstrompamela thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT peteroykellymarcy thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT aguirrekaren thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT awongtaylorjudy thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT balserteri thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT cahillmichaelj thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT freyreginaf thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT jackthomas thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT kelrickmichael thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT marleykate thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT millerkathryng thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT osgoodmarcy thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT romanosandra thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT uzmanjakif thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT zhaojiuqing thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT brancacciotarasloretta pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT papelindstrompamela pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT peteroykellymarcy pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT aguirrekaren pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT awongtaylorjudy pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT balserteri pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT cahillmichaelj pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT freyreginaf pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT jackthomas pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT kelrickmichael pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT marleykate pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT millerkathryng pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT osgoodmarcy pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT romanosandra pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT uzmanjakif pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes
AT zhaojiuqing pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes