Cargando…
The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types
The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, assess life sciences departments’ progress toward implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. This paper reports on the development of the rubrics, their validation, and their reliability in measuring departmental change align...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0260 |
_version_ | 1782471059233046528 |
---|---|
author | Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy Aguirre, Karen Awong-Taylor, Judy Balser, Teri Cahill, Michael J. Frey, Regina F. Jack, Thomas Kelrick, Michael Marley, Kate Miller, Kathryn G. Osgood, Marcy Romano, Sandra Uzman, J. Akif Zhao, Jiuqing |
author_facet | Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy Aguirre, Karen Awong-Taylor, Judy Balser, Teri Cahill, Michael J. Frey, Regina F. Jack, Thomas Kelrick, Michael Marley, Kate Miller, Kathryn G. Osgood, Marcy Romano, Sandra Uzman, J. Akif Zhao, Jiuqing |
author_sort | Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta |
collection | PubMed |
description | The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, assess life sciences departments’ progress toward implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. This paper reports on the development of the rubrics, their validation, and their reliability in measuring departmental change aligned with the Vision and Change recommendations. The rubrics assess 66 different criteria across five areas: Curriculum Alignment, Assessment, Faculty Practice/Faculty Support, Infrastructure, and Climate for Change. The results from this work demonstrate the rubrics can be used to evaluate departmental transformation equitably across institution types and represent baseline data about the adoption of the Vision and Change recommendations by life sciences programs across the United States. While all institution types have made progress, liberal arts institutions are farther along in implementing these recommendations. Generally, institutions earned the highest scores on the Curriculum Alignment rubric and the lowest scores on the Assessment rubric. The results of this study clearly indicate that the Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, are valid and equitable and can track long-term progress of the transformation of life sciences departments. In addition, four of the five rubrics have broad applicability and can be used to evaluate departmental transformation by other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5132357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51323572016-12-06 The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy Aguirre, Karen Awong-Taylor, Judy Balser, Teri Cahill, Michael J. Frey, Regina F. Jack, Thomas Kelrick, Michael Marley, Kate Miller, Kathryn G. Osgood, Marcy Romano, Sandra Uzman, J. Akif Zhao, Jiuqing CBE Life Sci Educ Article The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, assess life sciences departments’ progress toward implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. This paper reports on the development of the rubrics, their validation, and their reliability in measuring departmental change aligned with the Vision and Change recommendations. The rubrics assess 66 different criteria across five areas: Curriculum Alignment, Assessment, Faculty Practice/Faculty Support, Infrastructure, and Climate for Change. The results from this work demonstrate the rubrics can be used to evaluate departmental transformation equitably across institution types and represent baseline data about the adoption of the Vision and Change recommendations by life sciences programs across the United States. While all institution types have made progress, liberal arts institutions are farther along in implementing these recommendations. Generally, institutions earned the highest scores on the Curriculum Alignment rubric and the lowest scores on the Assessment rubric. The results of this study clearly indicate that the Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, are valid and equitable and can track long-term progress of the transformation of life sciences departments. In addition, four of the five rubrics have broad applicability and can be used to evaluate departmental transformation by other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. American Society for Cell Biology 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5132357/ /pubmed/27856548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0260 Text en © 2016 L. Brancaccio-Taras et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. |
spellingShingle | Article Brancaccio-Taras, Loretta Pape-Lindstrom, Pamela Peteroy-Kelly, Marcy Aguirre, Karen Awong-Taylor, Judy Balser, Teri Cahill, Michael J. Frey, Regina F. Jack, Thomas Kelrick, Michael Marley, Kate Miller, Kathryn G. Osgood, Marcy Romano, Sandra Uzman, J. Akif Zhao, Jiuqing The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types |
title | The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types |
title_full | The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types |
title_fullStr | The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types |
title_full_unstemmed | The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types |
title_short | The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types |
title_sort | pulse vision & change rubrics, version 1.0: a valid and equitable tool to measure transformation of life sciences departments at all institution types |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brancacciotarasloretta thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT papelindstrompamela thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT peteroykellymarcy thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT aguirrekaren thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT awongtaylorjudy thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT balserteri thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT cahillmichaelj thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT freyreginaf thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT jackthomas thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT kelrickmichael thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT marleykate thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT millerkathryng thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT osgoodmarcy thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT romanosandra thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT uzmanjakif thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT zhaojiuqing thepulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT brancacciotarasloretta pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT papelindstrompamela pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT peteroykellymarcy pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT aguirrekaren pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT awongtaylorjudy pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT balserteri pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT cahillmichaelj pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT freyreginaf pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT jackthomas pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT kelrickmichael pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT marleykate pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT millerkathryng pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT osgoodmarcy pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT romanosandra pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT uzmanjakif pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes AT zhaojiuqing pulsevisionchangerubricsversion10avalidandequitabletooltomeasuretransformationoflifesciencesdepartmentsatallinstitutiontypes |