Cargando…
Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching
Typically, faculty receive feedback about teaching via two mechanisms: end-of-semester student evaluations and peer observation. However, instructors require more sustained encouragement and constructive feedback when implementing evidence-based teaching practices. Our study goal was to characterize...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27909025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0249 |
_version_ | 1782471062645112832 |
---|---|
author | Brickman, Peggy Gormally, Cara Martella, Amedee Marchand |
author_facet | Brickman, Peggy Gormally, Cara Martella, Amedee Marchand |
author_sort | Brickman, Peggy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Typically, faculty receive feedback about teaching via two mechanisms: end-of-semester student evaluations and peer observation. However, instructors require more sustained encouragement and constructive feedback when implementing evidence-based teaching practices. Our study goal was to characterize the landscape of current instructional-feedback practices in biology and uncover faculty perceptions about these practices. Findings from a national survey of 400 college biology faculty reveal an overwhelming dissatisfaction with student evaluations, regardless of self-reported teaching practices, institution type, or position. Faculty view peer evaluations as most valuable, but less than half of faculty at doctoral-granting institutions report participating in peer evaluation. When peer evaluations are performed, they are more supportive of evidence-based teaching than student evaluations. Our findings reveal a large, unmet desire for greater guidance and assessment data to inform pedagogical decision making. Informed by these findings, we discuss alternate faculty-vetted feedback strategies for providing formative instructional feedback. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5132372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51323722016-12-06 Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching Brickman, Peggy Gormally, Cara Martella, Amedee Marchand CBE Life Sci Educ Article Typically, faculty receive feedback about teaching via two mechanisms: end-of-semester student evaluations and peer observation. However, instructors require more sustained encouragement and constructive feedback when implementing evidence-based teaching practices. Our study goal was to characterize the landscape of current instructional-feedback practices in biology and uncover faculty perceptions about these practices. Findings from a national survey of 400 college biology faculty reveal an overwhelming dissatisfaction with student evaluations, regardless of self-reported teaching practices, institution type, or position. Faculty view peer evaluations as most valuable, but less than half of faculty at doctoral-granting institutions report participating in peer evaluation. When peer evaluations are performed, they are more supportive of evidence-based teaching than student evaluations. Our findings reveal a large, unmet desire for greater guidance and assessment data to inform pedagogical decision making. Informed by these findings, we discuss alternate faculty-vetted feedback strategies for providing formative instructional feedback. American Society for Cell Biology 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5132372/ /pubmed/27909025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0249 Text en © 2016 P. Brickman et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. |
spellingShingle | Article Brickman, Peggy Gormally, Cara Martella, Amedee Marchand Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching |
title | Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching |
title_full | Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching |
title_fullStr | Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching |
title_full_unstemmed | Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching |
title_short | Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching |
title_sort | making the grade: using instructional feedback and evaluation to inspire evidence-based teaching |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27909025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brickmanpeggy makingthegradeusinginstructionalfeedbackandevaluationtoinspireevidencebasedteaching AT gormallycara makingthegradeusinginstructionalfeedbackandevaluationtoinspireevidencebasedteaching AT martellaamedeemarchand makingthegradeusinginstructionalfeedbackandevaluationtoinspireevidencebasedteaching |